Channel
@tester_Envell
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
13subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003921352286 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tester_Envell |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 30 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tester_Envell |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:01 | 13 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 13 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 270 |
| Reactions total | 66 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
66 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 45 | 68.2% | |
| 🥰 | 9 | 13.6% | |
| 💔 | 5 | 7.58% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 3.03% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 1.52% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 1.52% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 1.52% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.52% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.52% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Злата была расстроена от того, что этот разговор никак не уходил в её сторону, в её пользу. Моргарт начинал давить, Агафозис начинал беситься. Он звучал достаточно резко и громко, из-за чего девушка на момент вздрогнула, вся сжалась... Когда сатир уже звучал спокойнее, она выровнялась, но ещё была немного напугана.. Ей не хотелось скандалить, не хотелось портить отношения с ними вновь — всё-таки, только всё получилос…
❤3
Злата видела реакцию, и сразу же её стало от неё не очень хорошо. Его возмущенный тон и дальнейшая экспрессия напрягала... Она может понять мысли Агафозиса. Всё-таки, они друг для друга сделали достаточно зла.. — Но... Я понимаю, что это возможно, да... Но я постараюсь, чтобы этого не случилось! Я же придумаю что-нибудь. Чтобы он вас не стёр!... Вы же знаете, я это умею. Она посмотрела на Моргарта, надеясь, что тот…
❤2🥰1
Злата оглядывается вокруг практически родного для неё места... Но, почему-то, ожидаемый ей эффект не пришёл. Она надеялась, что только зайдёт внутрь — и ей будет сильно легче идти на переговоры со злодеями. В итоге, ошиблась... Не смотря на внешнее спокойствие двух гадов, Злата спокойной уж точно не была. Предположение Моргарта было практически верным, что Злата и сказала: — Ну... Почти. Я лишь хочу понять, что дел…
❤1🙏1
Наконец-то, вся компания была в Замке. Казалось бы, на этом их приключение заканчивается и каждый может заняться тем, чем хотел изначально... Только вот Злату многое волновало. Что делать с Ларсеном? Продолжать держать рядом и не выпускать из виду, или всё-таки отпустить его на волю? Этот выбор был сложным, и его стоило обсудить... Решить эту проблему она могла только с Агафозисом и Моргартом, хоть и понимала, что э…
❤3
В Замке безобидно.
❤2🔥1
Надеюсь, что сегодня мы придём к Замку. В последнее время мы, почему-то, абсолютно не торопимся... Но сейчас мы завершаем последнюю локацию до Замка. Дальше — я не знаю, что будет. Я хочу это с кем-нибудь обсудить. Знаю только одно — это время я не буду выходить... Мне лучше быть тут. Я давно это поняла.
❤3🔥1
Придётся заковать и ограничить в движениях. Мы с Агафозисом решили, что так будет лучше...хотя бы на время.
💔2❤1
Ну почему Ларсен сразу идёт сбегать..... Мы же не хотели ему вредить, мы даже не вредили ему! Я уже думала о том, что может снять с него оковы.... А теперь? Вариантов здесь немного...
💔2❤1
Какой ужас! Поющий зефир!... Он же очень сильно будет пищать. И фальшивить. Хахаха!! Это и правда забавно... Сладких снов, Агафозис... Если я не усну, то поговорим о чём-нибудь тупом..
🥰2❤1
Эти звёзды были забавными! Весело... Но как-то не до конца. Я посплю, Агафозис, и будет всё хорошо
🥰2❤1
Иногда, когда меня накрывает бессонница, я задумываюсь об одном. Вот, пожалуй, жалко, что игровые персонажи и NPC не спят! Всё было бы лучше, если бы у них была такая функция... Позволить себе сон не от истощения, а просто так. Или от лёгкой усталости... Как у нас, людей. Первое время, когда я была в Замке, было жутко от того, что я не могла поспать без ощущения, что за мной смотрят. Но я уже привыкла. Сейчас вот т…
❤3
Posted without readable text
❤1💔1😭1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tester_Envell. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 421,876 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“I want to break free!” (@tester_Envell), 13 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tester_Envell.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.