Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

#𝙩𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙖 𝙘𝙡𝙞𝙥𝙨 🔒

@tessaclips

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

122subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003826832836
TypeChannel
Username@tessaclips
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 13 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tessaclips

Growth

121122121.512 Aug 2026, 14:48 — 121 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 15:00 — 121 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 06:56 — 122 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 14:4813 Aug 2026, 06:56
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 121–122 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 06:56122+1
12 Aug 2026, 15:00121no change
12 Aug 2026, 14:48121first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
51s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

94 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52134321279656624902223.4%
custom 52404695312095390761516.0%
custom 53481219244111033441516.0%
custom 52402964268476412561010.6%
custom 535949373079553312599.57%
custom 523995668634459255066.38%
custom 524009480819787008066.38%
custom 543585586561159117144.26%
custom 543599520723557501444.26%
custom 524027934146773880222.13%
custom 524000061956506451611.06%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Jul 2026, 15:44 UTC136 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

снова всем привет, может кто-то желает купить этот канал ? цену обговорим. писать в анонку: @tessasanonbot

custom 53594937307955331252

25 Jun 2026, 13:54 UTC219 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 всем привет, ребята. не собираюсь больше тянуть, я закрываю канал. я больше не горю желанием делать какой-либо материал, и вас мучать тоже не хочу. я очень благодарна вам за всю поддержку, звёзды, реакции, актив и мотивацию. я вас безумно люблю. возможно когда-то вернусь, но вероятность этому равна примерно 3%. пришло время подвести 🪡🎂🏝⚡️🪡⏺ максимальное кол-во пдп: 135 собрано звёзд: 123 собрано подарков:

custom 53594937307955331257custom 54358558656115911712

25 Jun 2026, 13:51 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «#𝙩𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙖 𝙘𝙡𝙞𝙥𝙨 🔒»

25 Jun 2026, 11:43 UTC174 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

. запросы больше не принимаю

custom 54358558656115911712custom 54359952072355750141

25 Jun 2026, 09:03 UTC220 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤩🧦🍉🪟🌲🪧🐮🪡 ➡️ w Эффи🎵 кол-во: 29 ۫ 𓈒 ⭑ᤋᥲᥰρ᧐ᥴ ⚟ #нарезки #Скинс #ЭффиСтонем материал 😆 в комментариях! tessaclips | boost

custom 52134321279656624902

22 Jun 2026, 09:19 UTC188 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤩🇪🇨🥛🏝🏠🪧🪡 ➡️ w Чендлер🎵 кол-во: 57 цвет: синий ۫ 𓈒 ⭑ᤋᥲᥰρ᧐ᥴ ⚟ #эмодзи #ЧендлерРиггз материал 😆 в комментариях! tessaclips | boost

custom 52402964268476412563custom 52134321279656624902custom 52399566863445925502custom 52404695312095390762

20 Jun 2026, 10:50 UTC194 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤩🧦🍉🪟🌲🪧🐮🪡 ➡️ w Драко🎵 кол-во: 17 ۫ 𓈒 ⭑ᤋᥲᥰρ᧐ᥴ ⚟ #нарезки #БравлСтарс #Драко материал 😆 в комментариях! tessaclips | boost

custom 52134321279656624905custom 52400948081978700804custom 52404695312095390762

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tessaclips. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 617,232 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“#𝙩𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙖 𝙘𝙡𝙞𝙥𝙨 🔒” (@tessaclips), 122 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tessaclips.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.