Клумба с: В честь выбивания девочек 💅✨ #genshin
custom 543635287063712563118🔥17💋7❤🔥4custom 52696791141633387203custom 52828572721233419073❤1

Channel
@teshikatart
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
427subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001673867138 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @teshikatart |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/teshikatart |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 14:41 | 427 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 429 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 430 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:09 | 430 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
708 reactions across 11 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 233 | 32.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 141 | 19.9% | |
| custom 5282857272123341907 | 89 | 12.6% | |
| 🔥 | 64 | 9.04% | |
| 💔 | 38 | 5.37% | |
| custom 5269679114163338720 | 31 | 4.38% | |
| 🥰 | 27 | 3.81% | |
| custom 5246949837995267651 | 21 | 2.97% | |
| custom 5436352870637125631 | 21 | 2.97% | |
| 😢 | 14 | 1.98% | |
| 💋 | 12 | 1.69% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 1.27% | |
| 💅 | 8 | 1.13% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 708 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Клумба с: В честь выбивания девочек 💅✨ #genshin
custom 543635287063712563118🔥17💋7❤🔥4custom 52696791141633387203custom 52828572721233419073❤1
Референс оставлю ниже. Я не смогла его переплюнуть
❤🔥28🔥10💅8custom 52828572721233419075❤4custom 52696791141633387203
В кои-то веки я поработала над лицом... Не люблю это делать) Но он вышел аж каким-то заплаканным. Я бы тоже на его месте заплакала: рядом с Эвой смерть кажется милосердием, ей богу :/
❤44🔥21🥰13❤🔥5custom 52828572721233419073custom 52696791141633387201custom 54363528706371256311
С каждым новым постом я всё дальше от бога...
custom 528285727212334190728❤🔥12🔥6❤2😢1custom 52469498379952676511
Ляляля))))
❤🔥53custom 524694983799526765113😁8custom 52696791141633387206💋3🥰2custom 52828572721233419071
Скетчевый прострел височков, ма хорошие 💋✨
❤41💔19❤🔥11custom 52828572721233419077😢2
Да уже пох что выкладывать...
❤48custom 528285727212334190717custom 526967911416333872013custom 52469498379952676515🥰2😁1
А ещё попытки в тонкий юмор Сайно... Мда. Если он будет щеголять по Снежной с голым торсом и такими же ножками - это угар, конечно.
❤26🥰10❤🔥5🔥4
Впечатления от обновы... Спорные... Рэймсса опять гулять отправили (у кого он живой вообще). Ох бой, почему захватить с собой Эву Амен смог, а вот Рэймсса - нет? Что, мальчишечку уже не защитить?.. Я не понимаю((((
❤36💔19😢11
Упал - вставай. Встал - упай... С фильтром выглядит атмосфернее, но размыто. Так что прикладываю чёткого Феофана. #genshin
❤24❤🔥23custom 528285727212334190711💋2custom 52469498379952676512
Подсела на эту идею оч сильно. #genshin Вопрос художникам, вы так же, как и я, затемняете холст, когда рисуете? Столкнулась с тем, что я уж ОЧЕНЬ затемняю, и когда осветлять начинаю, уже не очень нравится :D От чего немного не понимаю, как кто воспринимает картинку. Может, вообще приходится с лупой рассматривать эту темень... Интересно просто, может эта беда не только у меня.
custom 528285727212334190714❤7🔥6custom 52696791141633387205custom 54363528706371256312
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @teshikatart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Teshikata 🫖” (@teshikatart), 427 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/teshikatart.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.