Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐇𝐞 𝐍𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐋𝐢𝐞𝐬

Channel

𝐇𝐞 𝐍𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐋𝐢𝐞𝐬

@tescief

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

36subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 10 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003957370104
TypeChannel
Username@tescief
Created13 April 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 September 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/tescief

Growth

363736.510 September 2026 — 37 subscribers12 September 2026 — 36 subscribers12 September 2026 — 36 subscribers10 September 202612 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 2 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36–37 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 06:2236no change
12 Sept 2026, 00:3536-1
10 Sept 2026, 01:4737first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 13 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
4
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

59 reactions across 5 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1728.8%
custom 530092665909911696958.47%
custom 614773686803838127458.47%
custom 613867075901220830446.78%
custom 621948897393744664546.78%
custom 527392358982382100935.08%
custom 527406503168681037635.08%
custom 539798075664133028635.08%
custom 585698936187833984123.39%
custom 585727036011368088923.39%
custom 603483224522988314823.39%
custom 604856064433507963523.39%
custom 613845957117529627623.39%
custom 626250240139199055423.39%
custom 629197477621478606223.39%
custom 530098917664307422711.69%

Custom emoji. 15 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2026 to 3 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
24
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 9 we hold a reading for · 44%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tescief. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 April 2026 to 3 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 May 2026, 08:10 UTC≈1,500 views10 reactionsread 12 September 2026

🤩🤩⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐🤩🤩

custom 53979807566413302862custom 61386707590122083042custom 61477368680383812742custom 62625024013919905542custom 62919747762147860622

3 May 2026, 08:09 UTC≈1,500 views13 reactions1 Starread 12 September 2026
Photo

Consider this not merely feedback, but reflection. What you choose to express 👄 and what you leave unsaid both carry weight. ♥️ Rate & Criticism 💋 Proof App Prem 🎰 Proof Others Leave your mark with intention. Because once it rests here, it becomes part of what defines @luciefst 👑

7custom 58569893618783398412custom 58572703601136808892custom 60348322452298831482

3 May 2026, 08:02 UTC≈1,300 views8 reactions4 Starsread 12 September 2026
Photo

Part III. OTHERS—Affidavit sovereign who never lies. 🎰 ♟× A collection of words, left quietly by those❞ Who have seen how things unfold here 🤩🤩🤩🤩 Not every line seeks attention–some simply reveal what lingers beneath. truth moves subtly, yet it stays⭐ The (🔥) Fallen Angel, Lucifer Morningstar.

2custom 60485606443350796352custom 61384595711752962762custom 62194889739374466452

24 Apr 2026, 17:02 UTC≈1,330 views13 reactions6 Starsread 12 September 2026
Photo

Part II. APP PREM—Affidavit sovereign who never lies. 💋 ♟× A collection of words, left quietly by those❞ Who have seen how things unfold here 🤩🤩🤩🤩 Not every line seeks attention–some simply reveal what lingers beneath. truth moves subtly, yet it stays⭐ The (🔥) Fallen Angel, Lucifer Morningstar.

7custom 61386707590122083042custom 62194889739374466452custom 53009891766430742271custom 53979807566413302861

24 Apr 2026, 15:58 UTC≈1,340 views15 reactions13 Starsread 12 September 2026
Photo

There is something almost arcane about him, an enigmatic sovereign of his own realm. A sovereign that never lies. To @luciefst all shall bow, willingly or otherwise 💙 تصميم Part I. A confession laid upon admiration ♥️ infinity/10—most fervently recommended. His craft is immaculate, executed with swiftness and precision, nothing short of extraordinary. His competence is beyond reproach;

custom 53009266590991169695custom 52739235898238210093custom 52740650316868103763custom 614773686803838127431

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @tescief. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐇𝐞 𝐍𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐋𝐢𝐞𝐬” (@tescief), 36 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tescief.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.