Channel
@tesanyawit
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003512415160 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tesanyawit |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tesanyawit |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 6 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:21 | 6 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:30 | 3 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (9 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,434 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 19:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
kalau masalah yuuna itu biarin tesa yuuna yang selesai-in nya, aku disini cuma apa ya sebagai orang yg kebetulan kena masalah dengan case yg mirip aja. udah bukan ranah aku juga buat ikut campur masalah mereka berdua. thank you all n little reminder please be kind to each other ya <3
Signed m @NoHello
halo ini m. masalah aku sendiri sama tesa udah terbilang clear ya, aku udah ngobrolin ini dan aku juga udah menerima aja karena aku pikir emang resiko jb juga. gapapa ga semua harus profit profit terus, aku jadiin pelajaran aja buat aku sendiri dari masalah ini
Signed m @NoHello
buat hal ini gabakal aku hapus, dan dri pihak dia juga gaada permintaan maaf atau jalan tengah sendiri, jd aku bakal tetep up tulisan ini biar gaada korban lagi yg kemakan dengan tulisan dia yg safe hold pdhl akun fresh, hold nya di seller sebelumnya, itu juga gaada bukti kuat buat hold ny, smoga habis ini gaada korban lagi, smoga dibuka pintu hatinya ya seller yg begitu🥰 dan bakal dibales sm yg diatas nnti meskipun …
Signed yuuna! only
aku pun bkin kronologi di ch gaada ya ngmongin dia begini begitu, aku pure ke masalah dia kenapa nulis akun fresh itu safe, trs gaada proof hold dri si seller sebelumnya, dengan alasan "lupa" giliran disalahin gaada proof bilangnya "Hb revert juga beda kali, belajar lagi sana" gw tau Hb revert sm cs beda, yg gw maksud itu bukti dia hold lama nya, bukan dia allrec atau Hb revert, masa gitu aja ga paham
Signed yuuna! only
aku dri kmren emg ada yg ngebahas hal yg dimaksud ini ya? perasaan jelas jelas yg dibahas masalah dia yg nulis akun safe pdhl fresh, knp jd bawa bawa masalah lain dan seakan akan gw yg berpusat pd sumbernya, trs akhirnya banyak yg nge hina dll, pdhl jelas jelas ada satu kompor yg bkin nambah ruwet masalahnya, trs disini dia bilang begitu dan gaada maaf sekalipun ke buyyer yg dirugikan, dan masih merasa paling benar, …
Signed yuuna! only
cs sebelum di tutup nih
Signed yuuna! only
skrg udh tutup cs ini si hamuy, trs di dc dia ga berani bales dan cwonya trs yg bales, gws ya tesa duit haram lu makan
Signed yuuna! only
udh di up di bp ya kronologi semuanya https://t.me/bantaipenip/32539
Signed yuuna! only
wow korban lain banyak ternyata, hdh tesa tesa malu dong
Signed yuuna! only
gue jg mau speak up. temen gue kan beli akun korless sm si tesa seharga 3,5 jt belum bbrp jam uda kehb ajah katanya jga refful uda mau diganti akun tp sampe skrg ga diganti ganti. padahal uda jelas jelas kehb itu bukan kehb revert. belum bbrp jam gmn kehb cs
Signed yuuna! only
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed ini m lagi @bolehello
gweh yg pernah terlibat drama smaa dua duanya bilek
Signed ini m lagi @bolehello
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @tesanyawit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 175,700 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“kronologi korblox fresh berkedok safe” (@tesanyawit), 6 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tesanyawit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.