Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🌸فاطمه سلمانی🌸

@termenevesht

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

481subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001070178114
TypeChannel
Username@termenevesht
Descriptionغما میشه جوهر قلم و میاد تو دستم میریزمشون رو صفحه ی سفید کاغذ! اونوقت میشم دست به قلم! تو زندگی بعدیم میشم عاشق! که دستات میاد تودستام.. برای حمایت صاحب اثر ممنون که با ذکر نام کپی میکنید 🙏🌸 17/5/96
CreatedBetween 1 August 2016 and 31 July 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/termenevesht

Growth

4815 Aug 2026, 23:04 — 481 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 18:49 — 481 subscribers5 Aug 2026, 23:046 Aug 2026, 18:49
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 480–482 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 18:49481no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:04481first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.3%
avg views ÷ 481 subscribers
Avg views / post
88.2
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
5
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held20 (14 February 202629 July 2026)
Views total441
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
778
Videos
77
Links
230

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

14 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1178.6%
👍17.14%
👎17.14%
😢17.14%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 February 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 22:37 UTC51 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @matiijanam

نه چیزی نیست خودم یه کاریش می‌کنم. (گریه می‌کنم.)

29 Jul 2026, 22:37 UTC53 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @matiijanam

نه واقعا هیچ چیز عادی نیست ولی بدیش اینه که ما به همین عادی نبودنه عادت کردیم

22 Jul 2026, 22:10 UTC105 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @matiijanam

حین گفت‌وگوهای روزمره با آدم‌ها گریه‌م می‌گیره. گریه‌های بی‌ربط. خودم می‌دونم اشکم از یه جای دیگه آب می‌خوره و لحظه‌ی چکیدن بهم می‌گه فکر کردی قورتم دادی و تموم شد رفت؟ کور خونده‌ای.

22 Jul 2026, 22:10 UTC104 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @matiijanam

کاش گریه کردن انقدر بی حاصل نبود، کاش یه چیزی رو تغییر می‌داد.

20 Jul 2026, 10:50 UTC128 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @matiijanam

من همیشه ناراحتم، حتی تو شادترین لحظه‌ی زندگیمم ناراحتم، حتی وقتی مثل سگ دارم بلند بلند میخندمم ناراحتم؛ اصلا چیزی به اسم خوشحالی تو من دیگه وجود نداره متاسفانه.

12 Jul 2026, 06:35 UTC163 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @AmirHossein_injast

اتفاقا قلق من خيلى راحته ؛ كافيه بهم توجه كنى بهم احترام بزارى، اولويتت قرارم بدى ديگه چشماى من كسى جز تورو نميبينه..!

12 Jul 2026, 06:35 UTC145 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @AmirHossein_injast

موضوع اینه که فرقی نمیکنه چه مدتی باهم تو رابطه‌اید نقطه پایان یه رابطه همونجاست که یکی از طرفین یادش میره چطوری مثل روزای اول به طرف مقابل توجه کنه.

12 Jul 2026, 06:34 UTC135 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @AmirHossein_injast

حتى اگه دودست و دوپا هم نداشته باشيد، صورتتون سوخته باشه، خيلى چاق يا لاغر باشيد، قدتون كوتاه يا بلند باشه، استرچ مارک و تيرگی و جوش داشته باشيد بازم "سزاوار عشقيد" نه تحقير و كم ديده شدن!

7 Jul 2026, 07:35 UTC173 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @raymonism

من موقع خرید مشکلی با پرداخت هزینه و کارت کشیدن ندارم، مشکلم اون لحظه‌ایه که باید وانمود کنی قیمت‌ها عادیه.

👍1

20 Jun 2026, 21:37 UTC206 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @matiijanam

کی دیده غم بمونه؟ من. من دیدم. من من من من.

20 Jun 2026, 15:13 UTC216 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @AmirHossein_injast

بهم گفت : خيلى ها نميخوان تو موفق بشی ، بخاطر اونا هم كه شده ؛ موفق شو!

1

20 Jun 2026, 13:13 UTC203 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @AmirHossein_injast

ايستاده ام و كسى هم نميداند اين بناى به ظاهر محكم چقدر در آستانه ی فروريختن است.

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @termenevesht. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🌸فاطمه سلمانی🌸” (@termenevesht), 481 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/termenevesht.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.