Channel
@terencecryptocafe
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
548subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001259159235 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @terencecryptocafe |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/terencecryptocafe |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Oct 2026, 00:56 | 548 | -3 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 19:59 | 551 | -4 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:55 | 555 | +1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 02:56 | 554 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 06:25 | 555 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:26 | 556 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 557 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 557 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
7 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 7 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
To addon to this: Not all solutions are foolproof: cold wallet, hot wallet, or keeping your funds in exchange. These are some risks: Self custody: chance of losing seed phrase, accidentally exposing seed phrase, malware that drains you (for hot wallets mostly), software bugs (like coldcard) Centralized Exchanges: Exchange closing down and halting withdrawals, losing customer funds due to irresponsibility Ever sin…
So if you've been seeing the news about Coldcard and the Bitcoin hack, let me just explain briefly what happened. If not, let me get you up to speed: Recently, a serious flaw was found in Coldcard hardware wallets, and around US$89 million worth of Bitcoin has reportedly been stolen so far. What happened exactly? Some Coldcard devices accidentally created recovery phrases using weak randomness. This made certain s…
So I didn't exactly wrote about this but Robinhood (yes, the investing platform) has launched a new layer 2 chain recently at the beginning of the month. So what happened so far? Basically one of the first memecoin that exploded and rose to over 200M market cap before proceeding to crash down again. Memecoins are exploding again on the Robinhood chain, but I can guarantee most people are getting burnt again. Now I…
Something to think about, where do you think we're at this point of the cycle seeing so many projects and even exchanges shutting down now. I think we're somewhere between Anger and Depression, and we may last a few weeks, or a few months. Who knows? One thing for sure, eventually things will start to rally, and this whole chart will play out again. We had the first BTC boom in 2016, NFTs in 2021, Memecoins in 202…
👍6
More CEX and DEXes shutting down. Here's a big tip from the big guy himself https://x.com/dango/status/2080707796144705625 https://x.com/BitMartExchange/status/2081197305491845201
Crypto Winter in effect again. We're starting to see companies wind up, chains shut down, firms going into bankruptcy. Be careful where you're putting your money at especially during these times. One of the OG CEX in the market has just announced shutting down as well and would wind down by 23rd September. If you're on DeFi, make sure to monitor the protocols your money is in. A lot of protocols are going under ver…
Just gotta share this truth. The fact is that most people get burnt by memecoins, and only a very tiny % of people do actually make money from it.
Cosmos used to be one of the hottest things back in 2021 to 2022, but now.. the projects using the cosmos ecosystem: Cosmos Labs never did build the Eureka (IBC V2) bridge to Solana or Ethereum L2s. Cosmos Labs never did address the super high inflation of the ATOM token. A whole host of validators left, including CitadelOne and Cosmostation. Noble went into maintenance mode, ending development of USDC and USDN. …
Uh oh. https://www.cnbc.com/2026/07/08/trump-says-iran-ceasefire-is-over-after-latest-round-of-strikes.html
Also...? Hmm (More stuff being posted here: https://x.com/i/trending/2074345424102818032)
Crypto cards are becoming more popular now with so many more on the market. But apparently one of it is facing some controversy: KAST crypto card. Apparently from getting an token from using the card to getting equity instead of an airdrop? Also read about people getting charged money for declined transactions as well. https://x.com/MikeSilagadze/status/2074241762583888312 Still an ongoing thing. I guess if you…
OUSD, a new stablecoin is coming soon. Apparently backed by 140+ partners including Visa, Stripe, Mastercard, BlackRock, Google and Coinbase (and a lot more if you see the picture) This is gonna be big.
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @terencecryptocafe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Crypto Cafe with Terence/Crandorz” (@terencecryptocafe), 548 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/terencecryptocafe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.