Channel
@tenmide
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
19subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002001555967 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tenmide |
| Description | -fs and multi edits -video star pro добрый медобот, любящий всех фигуристов (почти 😁) вп с 0 (пишем в лс сразу с постом) вз/ оп ❌ @trnkssa добро пожаловать, друзья 🖤 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 18 February 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tenmide |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 19 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:23 | 19 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 18 February 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
153 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 57 | 37.3% | |
| 💔 | 22 | 14.4% | |
| custom 5197617899467973917 | 14 | 9.15% | |
| custom 5413349420936740256 | 12 | 7.84% | |
| ❤🔥 | 12 | 7.84% | |
| 💋 | 11 | 7.19% | |
| 💘 | 11 | 7.19% | |
| custom 5474581193422809476 | 10 | 6.54% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 1.31% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.31% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 153reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 February 2024 to 21 March 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
всем привет, дорогие подписчики этого канала!) думаю вы заметили мой супер «актив», я бы хотела очень извиниться за это, так как понимаю насколько минус вайб сидеть на неактивных каналах 🤩 но пришло время сказать вам, что я заканчиваю деятельность на этом канале и в этом фандоме в принципе. я также слежу за фигурным катанием, но уже одна, не с вами причиной послужило моё рвение к новому в жизни, хочу жить ради себя, …
💔13❤3
да как же заебали шутки про понедельник, я скоро нахуй со всех каналов выйду
❤14
самый первый) безумно атмосферный турнир, стекло загимед, слезы жени после пп марка, саша тру на кпк, вырванная победа красных, короче, было прям очень круто 💋 ну и последний прям понравился!)
я не смотрела полностью турнир, но из просмотренных безумно понравились Василиса и Максим, Марк, Мишки, Петя Гумменик, ХудоБазины) 2023! так как очень разные были номера, до сих пор помню как плакала с номера медо 💔
господи помоги мне с ними пожалуйста
кстати, я создала бота анонимок 😁 https://t.me/anonimmquestionss_bot буду рада сообщениям! давно не общались)
безумно рада, что сделала хоть какое-то видео, для меня оно получилось не самым лучшим конечно, но что-то в этом есть 😁 большой достаточно перерыв, миллиард заброшенных за это время работ с разными фигуристами, как будто случилось какое-то выгорание от эдитинга, но мы справляемся) спасибо Василисе и Максиму за вдохновение и подаренные силы, чтоб сделать видео ❤️
❤🔥4
… так кто ж ты, наконец? я – часть той силы, что вечно хочет зла и вечно совершает благо. #fsedit by @tenmide 💜
❤5❤🔥2custom 54745811934228094762
Сколько раз переслушали? @obsudiim_fk
❤🔥2
маркушик в душу ❤️
❤3
4А от Влада Дикиджи @obsudiim_fk
— марк там стоял, когда вчера меня смотрел? — да. — так же хочу. —😼 #кондратенко
🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @tenmide. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 924,195 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“tenmide // ksu fs edits” (@tenmide), 19 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tenmide.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.