Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

10%

@ten_percentt

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,291subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002494318821
TypeChannel
Username@ten_percentt
CreatedBetween 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ten_percentt

Growth

2,2802,2912,285.56 August 2026 — 2,280 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,280 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,283 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,287 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,291 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,278–2,293 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 06:342,291+4
10 Aug 2026, 11:482,287+4
7 Aug 2026, 02:312,283+3
6 Aug 2026, 05:522,280no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:522,280first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 8 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
136.2%
avg views ÷ 2,291 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,120
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held19 (8 October 20254 August 2026)
Views total3,120
Reactions total95
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,997 reactions across 19 posts, in 41 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥89144.6%
💯24412.2%
❤‍🔥22211.1%
😁1236.16%
👏924.61%
😢542.70%
🏆492.45%
😭482.40%
💔301.50%
🤔301.50%
🤝291.45%
🤯231.15%
🥴221.10%
170.851%
👌170.851%
💩160.801%
🥰100.501%
🤣90.451%
🫡80.401%
🙏70.351%
21 further kinds562.80%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,997reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 October 2025 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
36
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 19 we hold a reading for · 37%
Most on one post
16
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ten_percentt. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 October 2025 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 16:22 UTC≈3,120 views95 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Летний съемочный сезон перевалил за экватор и уже можно подвести какие-никакие итоги. Начнем с рынка сериалов : Онлайн платформы, которые в последние годы были главным локомотивом роста рынка, резко сократили свои расходы и практически не запускают ничего нового, вместо этого продолжают развивать уже сущесвующие франшизы. Это связано с тем, что у стримеров закончился, так называемый “инвестиционный период” и началс

🔥37😢2715❤‍🔥4👏4🤡4🍌1👀1

18 Jun 2026, 07:57 UTC≈1,920 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Согласен с автором на 110%. Вы не представляете сколько раз к нам приходили сценаристы/режиссеры и с умным видом сообщали, что наш фильм был «отобран в Канны»…Short Film Corner - это не конкурс Канн. https://t.me/textortexel/8101

😁14🔥7👏5💩3🗿1

10 Jun 2026, 09:27 UTC≈4,340 views129 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Очень радостно видеть, что лидеры бокс-офисов России и США наконец-то совпали: в пятерке лидеров одни и те же тайтлы — «Майкл», «Обсессия» и «Закулисье Реальности». С «Майклом» все более-менее понятно, а вот на двух других фильмах я бы хотел остановиться отдельно. «Обсессия» снята 25-летним парнем по имени Кари Бейкер за 700 тысяч долларов и уже собрала в мировом прокате более 200 миллионов долларов, обогнав и новые

🔥65💯36❤‍🔥13👏8🌭2😁21😍1

20 May 2026, 08:20 UTC≈13,800 views285 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В Каннах удалось посетить премьеру нового фильма Андрея Звягинцева «Минотавр». Рецензию я писать не буду, для этого есть люди, которые умеют это делать гораздо лучше меня. От себя я лишь хотел бы добавить, что как же круто смотреть кино на русском языке, в котором люди пьют, курят, ругаются матом и занимаются сексом. То есть делают все ровно то, что в жизни делают нормальные люди. Ведь кино это не что иное, как срез

🔥125💯69😭32💔24💩12❤‍🔥8👏6🏆5

8 May 2026, 15:15 UTC≈2,830 views63 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Продолжаю вести хроники моего любимого перекрестка Bundy Drive and Wilshire Boulevard в Лос-Анжелесе, где очень удачно расположены два рекламных щита. Как мы помним в недавней рекламной кампании фильма Хищник, один билборд воевал с другим. В этот же раз маркетологи нового Mortal Kombat пошли дальше и разместили на соседнем борде рекламу несуществующей страховой компании, который и проткнул своим копьем Scorpion. По

😁39🔥21🤔2👏1

23 Apr 2026, 16:43 UTC≈3,630 views176 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня исполняется 15 лет с тех пор, как мы выпустили фильм Шапито-Шоу. Fun Fact – когда мы только начинали разработку фильма, никаких Фондов Кино еще не было и мы искали частные инвестиции. И самое интересное, что нашли – фильм на 100% был профинансирован частными деньгами, никаких «мягких денег» или рибейтов. Сначала инвестором был Александр Мамут, а потом проект подхватил Вадим Беляев, у него тогда был банк Откр

❤‍🔥94🔥59👏18😁2🍾1💩1🤯1

27 Feb 2026, 17:21 UTC≈3,290 views61 reactionsread 7 August 2026

WBD все-таки уезжает в Paramount, и не то, чтобы у меня есть какие-то незакрытые гештальты по этому поводу, но всегда приятно осознавать, что хоть где-то я оказался прав ) Единственное, что может теперь помешать этой сделке, это демократы в Конгрессе. Лично, я очень рад этому - теперь кинотеатральное окно будет не 17 дней, как хотели Нетфликс, a 45 - как хотят все, так называемые, Legacy Studios. https://deadline.c

🏆27🔥24👌4😢3🍾2👏1

17 Feb 2026, 08:46 UTC≈7,820 views185 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Ну и самое главное надо помнить, что кино не рождается из страха — оно рождается из наглости, риска и необходимости что-то сказать. Да, система сегодня устроена так, чтобы полностью отбить желание рисковать, но история всегда показывала одно и то же: прорывы делают не те, кто ждет разрешения, а те, кто делает несмотря на. Если перестать бояться идти на риск, то появятся и новые жанры, и новые герои, и, самое главное

🔥99❤‍🔥45👏24💯6🤷‍♂5🤣3👌2😡1

17 Feb 2026, 08:46 UTC≈10,000 views160 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Почему почти все отечественные фильмы, в последнее время, выглядят одинаково уныло? Короткий ответ – виноваты новые законы, цензура и, главное, самоцензура на местах, особенно среди прокатчиков и платформ. Это связано с тем, что все уже настолько запуганы,непонятно как трактующими, законами, страхами об отзыве прокатки и так далее, что прокатчикам и студиям проще браться за нейтральные и "пастеризованные" истории.

🔥93💯25😢24🏆6🤝5🥱3❤‍🔥2👌2

14 Feb 2026, 12:43 UTC≈15,300 views113 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вкратце о Берлинском кинорынке

😁57🔥22😭16🤣6💔5🙈4🤝1🥰1

13 Jan 2026, 07:57 UTC≈3,540 views54 reactionsread 7 August 2026

По поводу микродрам - как долго продлится ажиотаж и есть ли риск, что этот пузырь скоро лопнет? Прежде чем, углубиться в детали этого феномена, я хотел бы обратить внимание на одну важную вещь, которую, как мне кажется, многие упускают из вида: Микродрамы это первый случай в истории, когда создатели целенаправленно производят сериальный продукт, который предназначен для просмотра, исключительно, на экране смарт фон

🔥32💯12😁7🤔3

13 Jan 2026, 07:57 UTC≈3,380 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Пока этого не произошло - микродрамы поживут с нами какое-то время.

🔥23🫡8🥴6💯4

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ten_percentt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 139,942 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“10%” (@ten_percentt), 2,291 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ten_percentt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.