Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Anonymous Numbers Rental

@telerental

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

41subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001804793245
TypeChannel
Usernames@esquire @telerental
Created19 December 2022measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/telerental

Growth

3541385 August 2026 — 35 subscribers10 August 2026 — 35 subscribers11 August 2026 — 35 subscribers14 August 2026 — 41 subscribers5 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 9 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34–42 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 20:2741+6
11 Aug 2026, 07:0035no change
10 Aug 2026, 23:1535no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:4935first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 19 December 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

6 Feb 2024, 07:28 UTC861 viewsread 11 August 2026

Getgems SBT task https://t.me/community_bot/join?startapp=id_121

2 Feb 2024, 05:20 UTC775 viewsread 11 August 2026

The link to join The Open League’s first season and mint SBTs

2 Feb 2024, 05:17 UTC581 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @toncishub

🙏 Форма для обратной связи The Open League Если у вас возникли проблемы с минтом SBT NFT в The Open League, пожалуйста, заполните эту форму, чтобы помочь нам разобраться, что случилось. Мы сделаем все возможное, чтобы решить проблему и сминтить ваши SBT как можно скорее 🙏 TON Society СНГ (CIS) | TON Society CIS Announcements

21 Jan 2024, 18:27 UTC470 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Found an interesting thing in metadata of that collection Getgems stores images by this link http://188.68.220.93:8080/gg-dns?d= And http://188.68.220.93:8080/ itself returns Hello World! message

21 Jan 2024, 18:24 UTC399 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Getgems launched it's own domain system Now you can get yourself a domain name for minimum of 0.5 TON and set it as an beautiful address for your collection or getgems profile Link for collection, click Create Domain in the upper right corner

10 Jan 2024, 08:48 UTC324 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Y’all might have heard that SEC X account was compromised and seems like ETF has not been approved (Gensler’s tweet)

8 Jan 2024, 08:12 UTC322 viewsread 11 August 2026

Deadline for US Securities & Exchange Commission to vote on Bitcoin ETF applications, Wednesday (01/10/2024) Bloomberg Make your bets

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @telerental. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 942,251 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Anonymous Numbers Rental” (@telerental), 41 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/telerental.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.