Друзья, нужна ваша обратная связь! Уделите пару минут вопросам выше... Тот кто участвует - получает приоритетный доступ к решениям.

Channel
Telepraktik SPD
@telepraktikSPD
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
227subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001140494293 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @telepraktikSPD |
| Description | Высокоскоростной, безлимитный SPD без встроенной рекламы |
| Created | Between 1 May 2017 and 31 July 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/telepraktikSPD |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 227 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:49 | 227 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 9 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 51
- Videos
- 2
- Links
- 44
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
47 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 13 | 27.7% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 23.4% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 19.1% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 10.6% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 10.6% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 6.38% | |
| 👨💻 | 1 | 2.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2026 to 9 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Интернет работает все печальней и печальней 🤦♂️ Заметил такое, что интернет на устройстве с установленным любым КВН работает заметно медленнее чем без какого либо КВН. Серверные прокси работают как-будто быстрее и интернет не лагает. Такие вот наблюдения. Что такое серверные прокси? Не знаю надо ли объяснять что такое прокси вообще. Поэтому кратно: Это программы которые пропускают трафик через себя не показывая ку…
Друзья, временно не принимаем оплату. Разбираемся в чем проблема.
Фигма будет жить‼️ Добавили домены фигмы, скоро DNS обновятся и все заработает.
👍1
Ну чтож действие врагов народа России продолжается. Дружественная Китайская нейронка DeepSeek попала под раздачу, но в пользу кого? Яндекс, Сбер, скорее всего ВК( При попытке зайти на сайт обрывается проверка соединения на этапе TLS — это вероятный признак блокировки сервиса. Мы уже добавили домены в наш список. Работает.
❤🔥3
Печалька, похоже живем с "Белыми списками" на мобильном трафике.
❤2
Video, posted without a caption
😁5🔥1
Друзья, разбираемся... На текущий момент есть соединение, но система перестала работать. UPD: Все поправили работает в штатном режиме. Если у кого-то не работает пишите в сообщения канала.
Провели небольшой апгрейд и теперь Телеграм работает нормально. Была проблема скачивания и загрузки медиа, на данный момент этот вопрос решен. Мы следим за ситуацией если у вас что-то не грузится пишите в сообщения канала. Так же напоминаем для Телеграма держим актуальным канал @rumtproxy прочитайте закреп в нем подробно изложено как пользоваться.
🔥2
Ну что-ж, позорная компания опять обрушила банковскую систему. И это уже не в первый раз в погоне все и вся блокировать. Двойные стандарты во всем. Одним разрешим кто денег занесет другим запретим чтоб и не помышляли. Вместо разумной ассимиляции поглощения и создания конкурентных условий для развития — мы видим попытки все загасить. Ну не хочешь ср*ть, не мучай ж*пу. Классика одним можно, но зачем. Другим нельзя и…
🔥6
Сегодня многие каналы пишут что РКН не справляются с блокировкой... Сам РКН в ответе на запрос BFM опровергает это. Но что происходит уже понятно. См скрин, тут суть чем больше людей пользуется телеграм с встроенной защитой, тем больше ресурсов РКН сжигается. Чистой воды утилизация денег выделенных из наших налогов. Жаль что они тратятся не на то что нужно, лучше бы роботов строили. И хорошие мужики бы не гибли 😭
❤🔥3
Напоминаю что в рамках работы "Белого списка" работа профиля не возможна! Не является гарантийным случаем. Многие уже заметили что даже из белого списка не все сайты открываются. Это сильно печалит всех и нас в том числе. В чатах рекомендуют найти ip из белого списка, но рекомендаторы как правило очень далеки от реальности. За списком доступных IP очень пристально следят и вот так просто под ВПН никому не дадут их …
👍2👨💻1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @telepraktikSPD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 256,777 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Telepraktik SPD” (@telepraktikSPD), 227 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/telepraktikSPD.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.