3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 411–413 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 13:27
413
+2
8 Aug 2026, 05:35
411
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:54
411
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 9 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 09s
Average length
1m 09s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
58 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
19
32.8%
😁
12
20.7%
⚡
9
15.5%
💔
5
8.62%
🔥
5
8.62%
custom 5224306233539831385
4
6.90%
custom 5235661109163206595
2
3.45%
🙈
1
1.72%
🤯
1
1.72%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 9 March 2026 to 18 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
100
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
100
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @teleginya. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 March 2026 to 18 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Рада знакомству! Чтобы было понятно, чем я могу быть полезна вам или вашим проектам — вот краткий профессиональный бэкграунд: Я — Юлия Горчакова, медиапродюсер, GR-стратег. Занимаюсь информационным сопровождением первых лиц, брендов и госкорпораций
⚡️ Кратко о моих кейсах:
• Медиапродюсирование: «Абонент Недоступен» — 6,6 млн показов, включён в «Разговоры о важном»
• Политика & Регионы: избирательные кампании и губе…
Теперь тебе надо будет написать мемуары: путь от двойки до самого лучшего в классе по алгебре за 1 четверть.
В фильме рассказать про боль, слезы и унижения от мамы. Про твое сопротивление ежедневного наращивания примеров...и то, как ты чуть не вылетел из класса 😆😆😆😆
Показали мне пилот одного музшоу в России, которое ребята очень хотели бы запустить.
Я как обычно пошла копать рынок. Смотрю что снимают, как снимают, за счёт чего заходит. И нашла кое-что, что надо вам было обязательно принести в клювике)
Сначала посмотрите, а потом читайте дальше.
Тут ягодный ролик:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHLQROl3RPc
Тут фиолет:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkNB5AsgZOc
Пыльная роза:
…
— Яркие эмоции, веселые гости...
— Партнёрами фестиваля стали...
— Подтвердила одного из самых значимых мероприятий...
— Стенд стал ярким пятном...или как там
🤢🤢🤢
Мне кажется или в этом сюжете (презентационном ролике) собрали все клише районного сюжета? Или ещё постучат снизу?
И это я сижу на конференции по креативным индустриям в Москве.
Скажите, как такое можно нести в массы на профильном мероприятии?
Жду реклам…
MAX-дефлорация😧
вы думаете я сдалась?
нее
Я не сдалась (пока еще)
Это мы заходим на новые информационные площадки, чтобы вести канал для внутрикорпоративного мероприятия. Так как в Питере совсем не работает телеграм, выбора не осталось...идем в Max)
Срочно в номер ⚡️
Сегодня я узнала, что такое синдром отмены.
Кто не в курсах, я 5 месяц на АД (антидепрессанты). Но случилось так, что я пропустила 2 дня приема таблеток. К вечеру первого дня у меня пропал сон и я несколько раз просыпалась мокрая. В течение следующего дня температура держалась на отметке 36.8-37.00.
Сегодня встала и с утра как в песне: И меня повело ..о о. О....
А тут как раз и таблетки пришли в …
❤2🙈1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @teleginya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Проактивный анализатор @volanalitic · 131,965 Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ТЕЛЕГИНЯ | Бренд, медиа и продвижение в Telegram” (@teleginya), 413 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/teleginya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
