Кстати, каналы без метки А+ можно добавлять, просто система принимает их со 2-5 попытки)

Channel
Телега у Олега
@telega_y_olega
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
238subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002086767378 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @telega_y_olega |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/telega_y_olega |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:07 | 238 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 239 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:49 | 240 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:49 | 240 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 31 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
32 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 | 11 | 34.4% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 25.0% | |
| 🤯 | 7 | 21.9% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 18.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2025 to 31 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Можно оформить стабильную работу мессенджера на 2 года?
😁2
Max так хочет чтобы его обновили
Очередной баг или что это, с форматом публикации медиа в каналах Max. Картинка не показывается полностью, предпросмотр почему-то сжатый и так на многих постах. Чтобы разглядеть, нужно нажать и открыть. Неудобно для листания ленты, конечно
UPD: на телефоне кнопка есть, но на ПК и маке отсутствует, хотя приложения обновлены везде.
Еще Макс ввел новые правила для переноса каналов. Я зарегистрировал каналы в ТГ еще до появления метки А+. Перенес какую-ту часть в Max пару недель назад. Теперь, при попытке перенести другие каналы, выдает ошибку. Все из-за того, что нет метки А+ у канала. Как эту метку сейчас получить, понятия не имею. Если подавать канал заново на регистрацию (который уже зарегистрирован 🧐), то придется снова ждать 10-12 дней на…
🤯1
Макс. Итоги. Я не могу удалить пост у себя в канале
🤯6
Гениальный байт на рассылку
😁1
Хотя бы так побываю в Forbes
🏆The Top Club: самая большая сеть в IT-тематике F-Профиль: Олег (@oleginc) ▪️Telegram Forbes статусы: #1 сеть в IT-тематике по количеству каналов (2025) ▪️Статистика: Админ: Олег (@oleginc) Кол-во IT-каналов: 101 (источник) Кол-во аудитории: 1 555 532 Кол-во просмотров (24ч): 72 356 Средний ERR (24ч): 4,52 (источник) ▪️Примерный месячный оборот: 🔽 700 000 – 1 200 000 руб. ▪️Примерная оценка каналов: 🔽 5 000 000 -…
🏆7
маркеры хорошего сми дисклеймер: хорошим сми может быть как иноагентское, так и пророссийское или условно-нейтральное. мои рассуждения построены на фундаменте качества редактуры, уважения читателя и точности в подаче информации. за каждым сми стоит человек или группа людей со своими интересами — это очевидно. вопрос лишь в том, насколько бесшовно эти интересы попадают в нарративы издания и как сильно искажают факты…
👍2
маркеры низкосортного сми • дегенеративный кликбейт и остопиздевший алармизм в стиле: ❗️❗️❗️БУКВЫ — В С Ё ⚡️ ⚡️ ⚡️ ЭТО ФИНИШ: В РОССИИ СОБИРАЮТСЯ ЗАПРЕТИТЬ СРАТЬ очевиднейшая база, которая открывает хит-парад. • неироничная эксплуатация тем для людей с двузначным iq (ретроградный меркурий, гороскопы, эзотерика и прочая шиза) • намеренные манипуляции фактами ради репостов (например, выдача законопроекта или вообщ…
🏆4👍4😁3
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @telega_y_olega. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@kostylofficial · 1,334,954
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 August 2026
@JarvisNew · 89,191
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Телега у Олега” (@telega_y_olega), 238 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/telega_y_olega.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.