Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for دانشکده دندانپزشکی تلگرام

Channel

دانشکده دندانپزشکی تلگرام

@teledent_school

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

12,171subscribers

+84 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001900482309
TypeChannel
Username@teledent_school
Descriptionمحمد حسین بیگی @mh_beigi_80 "تیم دانشکده دندانپزشکی تلگرام"
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 31 January 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/teledent_school

Growth

12,08712,17212,129.57 August 2026 — 12,087 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,091 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,099 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,112 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,122 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,130 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,137 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,140 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,150 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,156 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,160 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,161 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,169 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,172 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,171 subscribers12,1717 August 202621 August 2026
15 measurements spanning 15 days, net +84. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,074–12,185 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 20:2712,171-1
20 Aug 2026, 18:2312,172+3
19 Aug 2026, 16:0712,169+8
18 Aug 2026, 18:5312,161+1
17 Aug 2026, 20:1512,160+4
16 Aug 2026, 17:2712,156+6
15 Aug 2026, 03:1912,150+10
13 Aug 2026, 18:0812,140+3
12 Aug 2026, 17:2312,137+7
11 Aug 2026, 18:2112,130+8
10 Aug 2026, 21:1412,122+10
9 Aug 2026, 20:5812,112+13
8 Aug 2026, 20:3612,099+8
7 Aug 2026, 22:5112,091+4
7 Aug 2026, 01:3212,087first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.6%
avg views ÷ 12,171 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,700
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.75%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 38 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held38 (20 July 202622 August 2026)
Views total159,930
Reactions total2,806
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
221
Videos
14
Links
62

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

2,955 reactions across 38 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,57853.4%
👍81027.4%
😁2418.16%
👎2247.58%
😐1023.45%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,955reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 38 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @teledent_school. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 38 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 22 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTC≈1,300 views99 reactionsread 22 August 2026

بیمار اندو ۷ بالا دیستال اکسس خیلی عالی شده بیمار فالو آپت دندونی که کشیدنی بوده رو نگه داشتی خارج سازی فایل شکسته داشتی و در اخر موزیک داریوش و رانندگی در غروب دل انگیز زندگی‌بهتر ازینم میشه؟

😁5521👎15👍8

21 Aug 2026, 18:35 UTC≈1,920 views7 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

این پست پاسخ به سوال خیلی هاتونه https://www.instagram.com/p/DcT_FX3jU0y/?igsi=MXAyaHJlemw1YTlhbw==

7

20 Aug 2026, 21:44 UTC≈2,370 views97 reactionsread 22 August 2026

ایمپلنت ۱۵ دقیقه ایو یادتونه؟ الان اندو ۱۰ دقیقه ای رو دارن باب میکنن! به هیچ وجه به حرفای اینا گوش نکنین فقط و فقط ترویج سمی کاری وبس.

59👍37👎1

18 Aug 2026, 05:56 UTC≈3,540 views42 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

الواتور کرایر ،مثلثی،پرچمی یک وسیله عالی برای ازین قبیل موارد البته یه نکته خیلی مهم داره چون نیروی‌خیلی شدیدی به فک وارد میکنه حتما باید ساپورت فک رو رعایت کنین درغیر این صورت ریسک شکستگی فک رو به دنبال داره

37😁5

18 Aug 2026, 05:54 UTC≈3,160 views11 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😐65

17 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC≈3,510 views104 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

همیشه که نباید اندوهای سخت و پیچیده یا تخصصی کار بشه ،بعضی وقتا باید مهارتت جوری باشه که یه تک کانالو به بهترین شکل و خصوصیات تکمیل کنی شست وشو خوب بدی تیپر مناسب باشه تعیین طولت خوب باشه پتنسی داشته باشی تراکم آبچوریشن مناسبی داشته باشی و در آخر دلسوزانه کار کنی... گرافی از ممبر های کانال که گویا تازه فارغ التحصیل شدن...

74😐23👎5👍2

17 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTC≈3,080 views20 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🦷 مقایسه بند و لوپ پیش‌ساخته هلال و شینهانگ تفاوت اصلی این دوتا توی فرم انتهای لوپه: 🔹 توی مدل هلال، انتهای لوپ یه فرورفتگی و انحنای مشخص داره؛ برای همین بهتر روی دندون کناری می‌شینه و تنظیمش راحت‌تره. 🔸 ولی انتهای لوپ شینهانگ صاف‌تره و زاویه‌هاش فرم خاصی ندارن؛ در نتیجه برای تکیه روی دندون C ممکنه کمی اذیت‌کننده باشه و به تنظیم بیشتری نیاز داشته باشه. در مجموع، طراحی هلال از نظر فرم و تطابق با دندون مجاور کاربرد

17👍3

16 Aug 2026, 19:45 UTC≈3,260 views33 reactionsread 22 August 2026

❓ احساس بلندی اکلوژن توسط بیمار بعد از ترمیم اونم در شرایطی که ترمیم کامل آف شده چه علتی میتونه داشته باشه؟ ✅ پیشنهاد میشه همراه با کاغذ اکلوژن همه حرکات جانبی را انجام بده. با نگاه به درستی حرکات، اگر اثری مشهود نبود نیاز به کوتاه کردن دیگر نیست. گاهی در مسیرهای جانبی بلندی وجود داره. و البته گاهی بقایای مواد ترمیمی روی دیگر دندان‌ها با توجه به بی حسی و حتا گاهی جویدن زبان یا گونه بی حس شده. گاهی حالت خوابیده با ح

24👍9

15 Aug 2026, 06:56 UTC≈3,410 views115 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

اینم یه سوال از مراجعین کانال😁

😁87😐28

12 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTC≈4,240 views17 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Poll

برای برطرف کردن موانع کرونالی از چی استفاده میکنین؟

  1. اوریفیس شیپر64%
  2. گیتس25%
  3. فایل دستی شماره بالا19%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

9👎6👍2

11 Aug 2026, 15:43 UTC≈4,600 views151 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

کمتر کسی رو میشناختم مثل ایشون مهربان و خدمت رسان باشند روحشان پر از نور باد🖤🖤

148👍3

11 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC≈4,550 views33 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Orifice Shaper ها در اکثر سیستم های روتاری وجود دارند . کما اینکه استفاده از سیستم ها سلیقه ای هست ؛ در استفاده از کدام نوع اوریفیس شیپر هم سلیقه نقش مهمی دارد . بصورت کلی استفاده از اوریفیس شیپرها جهت Preflaring بخش کرونالی کانال ( بر اساس طول ریشه یک سوم و یا یک دوم کرونالی ) به شدت توصیه میشود . پست اینستاگرام سوال وپاسخ اوریفیس شیپر

24👍9

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @teledent_school. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTCAnonymous Poll1,130 voters approx.

برای برطرف کردن موانع کرونالی از چی استفاده میکنین؟

  1. اوریفیس شیپر64%
  2. گیتس25%
  3. فایل دستی شماره بالا19%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

27 Jul 2026, 20:39 UTCAnonymous Poll1,460 voters approx.

اگر بیمارتون آسپرین مصرف میکنه واسه جراحی افزایش طول تاج نیازی به قطع کردن دارد؟

  1. بله33%
  2. خیر68%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Jul 2026, 18:51 UTCAnonymous Poll1,110 voters approx.

اگر فضا بین پست و دندان بود ما باید چیکار کنیم؟

  1. قالبگیری مجدد53%
  2. پر کردن با آمالگام یا هر مواد رستوریتیو8%
  3. با سمان لوتینگ44%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

23 Jul 2026, 16:45 UTCAnonymous Poll1,170 voters approx.

؟

  1. ۱10%
  2. ۲92%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 22 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 260,789 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“دانشکده دندانپزشکی تلگرام” (@teledent_school), 12,171 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/teledent_school.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.