⚠️ پس یه نکته ساده ولی مهم: «۲۰ ثانیه Light Cure» بهتنهایی تضمینکننده Cure مناسب نیست. 💡🦷 📚 Reference: Sturdevant’s Art and Science of Operative Dentistry 8th Edition Ritter, Boushell & Walter Elsevier
❤3

Channel
@dentan_ac
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
12,487subscribers
+34 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001149244033 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dentan_ac |
| Created | Between 1 June 2017 and 31 August 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dentan_ac |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 12,487 | +5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:11 | 12,482 | +13 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:51 | 12,469 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 12,467 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 12,465 | +9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:21 | 12,456 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:30 | 12,453 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:27 | 12,453 | first reading |
40 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 27 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 40 (3 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 36,837 |
| Reactions total | 62 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 03:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
62 reactions across 24 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 47 | 75.8% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 11.3% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 6.45% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 6.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚠️ پس یه نکته ساده ولی مهم: «۲۰ ثانیه Light Cure» بهتنهایی تضمینکننده Cure مناسب نیست. 💡🦷 📚 Reference: Sturdevant’s Art and Science of Operative Dentistry 8th Edition Ritter, Boushell & Walter Elsevier
❤3
پس موقع Light Cure فقط حواست به تایمر نباشه 👇🏻 ✅ تیپ رو تا جای ممکن نزدیک سطح قرار بده. ✅ جهت تابش تا حد امکان عمود بر سطح باشه. ✅ لایت گاید رو از نظر آلودگی یا Composite residue بررسی کن. ✅ ضخامت Increment رو مطابق توصیه سازنده انتخاب کن. ✅ زمان Cure توصیهشده برای همون کامپوزیت و دستگاه رو در نظر بگیر.
مثلاً اگر Tip رو از کامپوزیت دور نگه داری یا نور رو با زاویه نامناسب بتابونی... ممکنه با وجود اینکه تایمر دستگاه همون «۲۰ ثانیه» رو نشون داده، انرژی کافی به کامپوزیت نرسیده باشه. 😐
⏱ زمان تابش فقط یکی از متغیرهای Light Curing ـه. انرژیای که واقعاً به کامپوزیت میرسه تحت تأثیر چند عامل قرار داره: 🔸 Irradiance دستگاه 🔸 فاصله Light tip از ترمیم 🔸 زاویه تابش 🔸 تمیز بودن Light guide 🔸 ضخامت Increment 🔸 شید و Opacity کامپوزیت 🔸 و مشخصات خود Material
🦷 کامپوزیت رو گذاشتی... ۲۰ ثانیه Light Cure کردی. پس یعنی حتماً کامپوزیت به اندازه کافی Polymerize شده؟ 👀 نه لزوماً!
*اطفال دقیقاً پر از همین تصمیمهای ریزه...* 👶🏻🦷 اینکه: ▶️ کِی Pulpotomy؟ ▶️ کِی درمان دیگهای لازمه؟ ▶️ چه دندونی اصلاً Candidate مناسبیه؟ ▶️ و با عوارض و شرایط مختلف چطور برخورد کنیم؟ ‼️ دونستن تکنیک بهتنهایی کافی نیست؛ باید بتونی برای هر کیس تصمیم درست بگیری. ⚠️ *برای آموزش کاملتر درمانهای اطفال، پکیجهای «کودکان ۱، ۲ و ۳» دنتان در دسترس هستن. 👇🏻* https://dentan.academy/
❤1
📌 پس نکته کلینیکی: * Pulpotomy فقط یه سری مراحل مکانیکی نیست که برای هر دندون شیری به یک شکل انجام بشه*! ‼️ تشخیص وضعیت پالپ تعیین میکنه اصلاً این درمان برای اون دندان مناسبه یا نه. و یافتههایی که حین درمان میبینی هم ممکنه باعث بشن تصمیم اولیهت رو دوباره ارزیابی کنی.
👍1
*اما حواست باشه 👇🏻 تصمیم درمانی فقط با نگاه کردن به خونریزی گرفته نمیشه! ⚠️* قبل و حین درمان باید مجموعه یافتهها رو کنار هم بذاری: ▶️ شرح حال و نوع درد ▶️ معاینه کلینیکی ▶️ رادیوگرافی ▶️ وضعیت پالپ ▶️ میزان تخریب دندان ▶️ و امکان کنترل خونریزی بعد از Amputation ✅ همه اینها در انتخاب درمان نقش دارن.
❤1
*چرا کنترل خونریزی مهمه؟ 🤔* چون خونریزیای که بعد از برداشتن کامل پالپ کرونال با روش مناسب کنترل نمیشه، ⚠️ میتونه نشونهای باشه که وضعیت پالپ رادیکولار با یک Pulpotomy موفق سازگار نیست. یعنی صرفاً چون درمان رو با هدف Pulpotomy شروع کردیم... ⛔ *مجبور نیستیم تحت هر شرایطی با Pulpotomy تمومش کنیم!*
❤3👍1
اول یه نکته مهم ‼️ *در Pulpotomy فقط برداشتن Coronal Pulp مهم نیست.* بعد از Amputation پالپ کرونال، وضعیت پالپ باقیمونده هم باید ارزیابی بشه. 🦷 ▶️ یکی از یافتههای کلینیکی مهم: امکان دستیابی به Hemostasis هست.
👍2
🦷 یه کیس اطفال: دندان شیری رو با تشخیص مناسب برای Pulpotomy باز کردی... سقف پالپ چمبر رو برداشتی، Coronal Pulp هم Remove شده. ولی... 👀 🩸 خونریزی پالپ اونطور که انتظار داری کنترل نمیشه! حالا چی؟ ▶️ Pulpotomy رو ادامه میدی؟ ▶️ یا این یافته میتونه تصمیم درمانی رو تغییر بده؟
👍2
و این فقط یکی از دردسرهاییه که ممکنه بعد از یه Extraction به ظاهر ساده باهاش روبهرو بشیم! 😅🦷 ‼️ کشیدن دندان فقط «درآوردن دندان» نیست... از انتخاب کیس و تکنیک Extraction تا مدیریت عوارض حین و بعد از درمان، هر مرحله تصمیمهای خودش رو داره. ⚠️ اگه میخوای آموزش کامل این مسیر رو داشته باشی، پکیج «صفر تا صد کشیدن دندان» دنتان رو داخل سایت دنتان ببین. 👇🏻 https://dentan.academy/
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @dentan_ac. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 614,388 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دنتان | Dentan” (@dentan_ac), 12,487 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dentan_ac.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.