3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 963–970 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 16:48
969
+5
6 Aug 2026, 17:17
964
no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:01
964
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.6%
avg views ÷ 969 subscribers
Avg views / post
190
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held
20 (30 January 2026 – 31 July 2026)
Views total
379
Reactions total
13
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
136 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
53
39.0%
🔥
52
38.2%
❤
6
4.41%
👀
5
3.68%
🎉
4
2.94%
🤔
4
2.94%
⚡
3
2.21%
💯
3
2.21%
🤩
3
2.21%
😁
1
0.735%
😢
1
0.735%
😱
1
0.735%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 136reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @telderi_channel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 January 2026 to 31 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🤫 Закрытые лоты на Telderi
Эти проекты не публикуются в открытом каталоге - доступ к ним предоставляется только по запросу.
Вот несколько проектов из закрытого каталога:
🔒 Сервис поиска цен на топливо
АЗС-локатор с актуальными ценами на топливо по всей России и удобным поиском ближайших заправок. Стоимость: 15 000 000 ₽
🔒 Историко-познавательный портал
Проект об истории и культуре с Дзен-каналом на 460 000 подпис…
⭐️ Что такое репутация на Telderi и почему она важна?
Репутация — это показатель надежности пользователя, который отображается рядом с логином. Чем она выше, тем больше доверия со стороны других участников площадки.
Как формируется репутация?
✅ Повышается за успешные сделки.
✅ Первое повышение репутации можно получить уже при активации аккаунта через банк.
❌ Снижается за срыв сделок. Причем потерять репутацию можн…
📊Telegram или MAX: где интереснее инвестировать?
С появлением каналов в MAX всё больше инвесторов задаются вопросом: чем они отличаются от Telegram с точки зрения покупки?
Telegram сегодня:
• Зрелый рынок с понятным ценообразованием.
• Развитая аналитика (Telemetr).
• Проверенные модели монетизации и большое количество сделок.
MAX сегодня:
• Новый рынок, который только формируется.
• Возможность приобрести актив д…
🖥 Владельцам сайтов на заметку: для доменов .RU, .РФ и .SU вводится обязательная идентификация через Госуслуги.
С 1 сентября 2026 года зарегистрировать, продлить или внести изменения в домен в зонах .ru, .рф и .su можно будет только после подтверждения личности через ЕСИА (Госуслуги). Новые требования распространяются на физических лиц, ИП и компании.
🤔 Что делать, если вы — нерезидент или домен оформлен не на вас?…
🔍 Не нашли подходящий проект? Мы подберём сами!
Бывает: смотришь каталог, листаешь лоты, а «тот самый» проект никак не попадётся. Или есть чёткое понимание, что нужно, но времени искать нет.
Для таких случаев на Telderi есть услуга «Запрос на подбор».
Как это работает:
Вы заходите в раздел «Запрос на подбор» и указываете:
— какой проект хотите купить;
— желаемые показатели (доход, трафик, тематика);
— бюджет.
Посл…
📊 Калькулятор оценки сайтов снова работает
Запустили калькулятор стоимости сайтов на Telderi — теперь он точнее, быстрее и считает на актуальных данных.
Главное — оценка строится на статистике реальных сделок Telderi, а не на абстрактных формулах. Поэтому цифра близка к рынку.
Как работает:
Открываете калькулятор → вставляете URL сайта (ИКС и страницы в поиске подтянутся сами) → добавляете доход, трафик и возраст …
📉 Плохое описание убивает продажу даже хорошего сайта
Можно иметь стабильный трафик и прибыль, но не получить достойных предложений.
Почему? Инвестор оценивает не только цифры, но и то, как представлен лот.
На что покупатель смотрит в первую очередь:
➡️ Трафик и его динамику — важен не только объем, но и динамика.
➡️Источники дохода и их стабильность — откуда приходят деньги и насколько насколько стабилен доход.
…
⚡️ Новый способ монетизировать Telegram-канал
Телеметр запускает биржу рекламы. Рекламодатели покупают размещения напрямую, а система берёт на себя всё остальное: публикацию, удаление, маркировку и выплаты.
Комиссия ниже рынка, все процессы прозрачны. Добавить канал можно уже сейчас — биржа скоро запускается.
👉 telemetr.me/my_channels
📊 Крупные лоты: подборка на Telderi
Ваш бюджет позволяет рассматривать серьезные проекты? Тогда смотрите сюда!
В подборке — крупные лоты, которые подойдут как для самостоятельного управления, так и для инвестиций.
Стабильная посещаемость, понятная монетизация и потенциал для роста💥
🌐 Каталог-рейтинг сервисов для бизнеса
Оптимальная цена: 19 888 889 руб.
🌐 Строительный портал №1 в РФ
Оптимальная цена: 9 888 889 ру…
🚀Продадим ваш лот эффективнее: премиум-продвижение от Telderi
Запускаем «Брокерское сопровождение» — премиум-продвижение для владельцев интернет-активов, которые хотят продать лот быстрее, выгоднее и с профессиональной поддержкой на каждом этапе.
Что входит в пакет:
✔️ Приоритетное размещение в каталоге и рост просмотров лота в 3–5 раз
✔️ Email-рассылка по базе проверенных инвесторов + публикации на партнерских пло…
👍5🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @telderi_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 431,230 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Telderi – биржа интернет проектов. Купить | Продать” (@telderi_channel), 969 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/telderi_channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.