3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 472–474 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 14:36
472
-2
8 Aug 2026, 04:35
474
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:40
474
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 13 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
26.0%
avg views ÷ 472 subscribers
Avg views / post
123
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 8 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026
Posts held
8 (13 June 2026 – 25 July 2026)
Views total
245
Reactions total
34
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 04:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
131 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
59
45.0%
🔥
31
23.7%
👍
21
16.0%
😁
8
6.11%
🍓
5
3.82%
🥰
5
3.82%
🍾
1
0.763%
👏
1
0.763%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 131reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🫧 Игристый чай
Если не слышали, это такой тренд, который возник на фоне спроса ко всему по-прежнему эстетскому (типа вина), но безалкогольному (типа безалкогольного вина).
На сайте Блюпринта можно почитать подробнее историю этого явления.
И если с безалкогольным вином все по-прежнему в целом плохо — как ни крути, его всегда будут сравнивать с обычным и на этом поле оно проиграет, то вот с чаем идея действительно к…
После своей поездки в СССР в 1957 году, Габриэль Гарсиа Маркес напишет такие строчки о нашем любимом напитке:
Советские люди, к сожалению, не пьют кофе и завершают трапезу чашкой чая. Они пьют его в любое время дня. В лучших отелях Москвы подают китайский чай такого поэтического свойства и с таким тонким ароматом, что хочется вылить его себе на голову.
Лить, конечно, не будем, но заварить — заварим 🫖
У Нитки получилось сделать классный проект, которого реально ждёшь каждый месяц. Если что — на фотке их чайная рассылка, которую получаю уже полгода. Там всегда письмо, открытка и 8 грамм рандомного чая. Иногда такого, которого вообще нет у них в продаже.
Я сложно отношусь к купажам (хотя сам их иногда придумываю, хе-хе), но у ребят получается делать интересные штуки. Например, последняя рассылка была со смесью инди…
Чайная церемония в воскресенье, 19 июля
На наших чайных встречах мы всегда ориентируется на погоду (а она нас пока не радует), поэтому в этот раз будем исследовать тему красного чая с его вариациями и отступлениями от классики. Вот, что будем пить:
💎Красный агат — приготовлен по технологии бескислородной ферментации. Так что если вы думали, что «габой» бывает только улун, то самое время в этом разубедиться. В арома…
Новый чай и новая пиала
Хотя по размеру больше ей больше подходит слово «чаша». Это подарок Саши, а сделала её керамистка Tsukahara Ceramics.
Тестировал в ней красный Чжун Ло Хун. Чайник 100 мл спокойно весь помещается в пиале, сливник тут и не нужен, на первый взгляд. Но пиала нагревается очень мощно, поэтому пришлось его все-таки взять (ну и + это красиво).
Чай яркий, с сильным ароматом красных ягод, варенья и и…
Отвечаем, что же такое эта габа
ГАМК (гамма-аминомасляная кислота) — главный «тормозной» нейромедиатор мозга. По-английски это GABA (gamma-aminobutyric acid) — отсюда и название «габа», которое прижилось в мире чая и БАДов.
Проще говоря, это вещество, которое успокаивает нервную систему, снижает тревогу и помогает со сном. Мозг вырабатывает его сам — но его можно получать извне. С БАДами или вот, например, чаем.
К…
«Митрополичье варенье». Выставка в кремле Ростова Великого
Несколько картин XIX–XX веков традиционного русского чаепития, которое не обходилось без фруктового или ягодного десерта 🍓
❤6🍓5🔥5🍾1
Signed Кир Баглай
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @tee_blue_peony. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 25 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Синий Пион: чай и лекции” (@tee_blue_peony), 472 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tee_blue_peony.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
