Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Типирование | GrandOldTed

Channel

Типирование | GrandOldTed

@tedtypology

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

119subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002216067911
TypeChannel
Username@tedtypology
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tedtypology

Growth

119122120.58 August 2026 — 122 subscribers9 August 2026 — 122 subscribers16 August 2026 — 121 subscribers24 August 2026 — 120 subscribers9 September 2026 — 119 subscribers8 August 20269 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 32 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 119–122 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 13:42119-1
24 Aug 2026, 05:55120-1
16 Aug 2026, 13:48121-1
9 Aug 2026, 03:32122no change
8 Aug 2026, 23:30122first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

187 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥7037.4%
❤6434.2%
❤‍🔥2111.2%
🥰136.95%
👍63.21%
💯63.21%
😎42.14%
⚡10.535%
🏆10.535%
🤯10.535%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 187 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2025 to 31 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tedtypology. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 June 2025 to 31 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Mar 2026, 18:46 UTC388 views3 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026

На случай блокировок оставляю аккаунт ВК, куда вы можете написать для записи на типирование. Если буду долго отвечать в ТГ или если ТГ у вас в принципе не работает, обращайтесь в ВК. https://vk.ru/id877775292

👍2❤1

18 Feb 2026, 05:54 UTC540 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Отзыв на типирование по MBTI Записаться на типирование @GrandOldTedWork

❤2

22 Jan 2026, 10:58 UTC620 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Отзыв на типирование по эннеаграмме Запись на типирование: @GrandOldTedWork

❤2

12 Dec 2025, 17:41 UTC710 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Отзыв на типирование по эннеаграмме и мбти Запись на типирование: @GrandOldTedWork

10 Dec 2025, 14:58 UTC613 viewsread 9 August 2026

Спасибо вам за такой подробный отзыв!

10 Dec 2025, 14:57 UTC591 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Меня поражает то как всё подходит, даже не смотря на то что некоторые моменты с определением доминантной функции удалось найти именно Ni. Да, это буквально про меня, почему-то это "чутьё" в большей степени считала обострённой логикой. Всё таки теория с Е1 и интуитом оправдала себя, так бывает, а значит некоторые корреляции с ESTJ + Е1 не совсем полноценны, и достаточно сухие в этом плане. Печально что этому E-типу н…

🔥5

5 Dec 2025, 19:07 UTC472 viewsread 9 August 2026

О чем хотите почитать? Пишите идеи в комментарии. Если вам нравится чья-то идея, поддержите ее реактом, и я увижу, что вам интересно.

5 Dec 2025, 08:50 UTC≈1,150 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026

КАК ЭННЕАГРАММА УБИРАЕТ ССОРЫ ИЗ ОТНОШЕНИЙ Эннеаграмму изучают, чтобы разобраться в себе: в своих страхах, реакциях, мотивах. А потом это же знание помогает понять других — не осудить, а найти с ними общий язык, когда их логика кажется чужой. Смена гнева на любопытство Обычная реакция на поведение другого — раздражение или обида. Эннеаграмма эту реакцию меняет. Фраза «Он снова всё перепроверяет!» сменяется понима…

🔥9❤4👍3❤‍🔥2

1 Dec 2025, 07:02 UTC408 views41 reactionsread 9 August 2026

КАК ЭННЕАГРАММА МЕШАЕТ ОТНОШЕНИЯМ Эннеаграмма помогает понять, почему люди ведут себя по-разному. Почему один злится из-за мелочей, другой пропадает в работе, а третий всё время шутит, когда надо серьёзно поговорить. Знание типа даёт подсказку. Но иногда эта подсказка становится оправданием. Когда типология вредит другим Часто мы заменяем реальность теорией. Думаем: «Он не пишет, потому что он «Девятка» и уходит …

❤18🔥11❤‍🔥6💯5⚡1

17 Nov 2025, 10:00 UTC413 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Отзыв на типирование по эннеаграмме Запись: @GrandOldTedWork

🔥4❤1❤‍🔥1

15 Nov 2025, 13:27 UTC444 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Для таких сообщений и работаю 😎 (Отзыв на типирование по эннеаграмме) Записаться: @GrandOldTedWork

❤5

9 Oct 2025, 08:40 UTC635 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Отзыв на типирование по мбти Запись на типирование: @GrandOldTedWork

❤4❤‍🔥1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tedtypology. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Jun 2025, 11:15 UTCAnonymous Poll110 voters

типировали ли вашу 3-ю функцию в психософии как 1-ю?

  1. да37%
  2. нет34%
  3. см рез29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2025 to 31 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Типирование | GrandOldTed” (@tedtypology), 119 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tedtypology.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.