Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Tech Talks with Masha

@techtalkswithmasha

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,069subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001879448049
TypeChannel
Username@techtalkswithmasha
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/techtalkswithmasha

Growth

2,0682,0702,0697 August 2026 — 2,070 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,070 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,068 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,069 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,068–2,070 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 07:332,069+1
8 Aug 2026, 11:512,068-2
7 Aug 2026, 14:482,070no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:382,070first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 6 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

467 reactions across 9 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
27358.5%
🔥8618.4%
388.14%
🍾183.85%
🙏132.78%
💯112.36%
👍91.93%
🥰71.50%
💘61.28%
🐳40.857%
❤‍🔥20.428%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 467reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 6 March 2026 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 9 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @techtalkswithmasha. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 March 2026 to 10 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
11.1%
1 of 9 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
451
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
789
over 8 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
CQH36pWzJq5E1NEWyPGKPazZPZtM6ZhJkrKAu8tPBnX6yW110 July 202610 July 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 6 March 2026 to 10 July 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

10 Jul 2026, 14:12 UTC451 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Advertisementerid CQH36pWzJq5E1NEWyPGKPazZPZtM6ZhJkrKAu8tPBnX6yWPhoto

Последние пару недель я много думаю про одну вещь, это про уязвимое, но хочу поделиться, — вдруг это откликнется ❤️ Еще в 2025 году я поняла, что для руководителя коучинг классный инструмент развития. Не потому, что тебе расскажут, как жить или строить карьеру. А потому что иногда один правильный вопрос помогает увидеть то, что годами не замечал. И поэтому я решила выбрать для себя коучинг опять и пойти в сервис ка

25🙏13👍9🐳1

26 Jun 2026, 09:43 UTC650 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Когда я переехала из Москвы в Питер, оказалось, что во втором есть две вещи, которые стабильны: пасмурная погода с низким небом и классные завтраки. Есть у меня маленькая традиция, по четвергам или пятницам перед работой выдохнуть, перезагрузиться и позавтракать в классном месте. Маленький праздник среди рабочей недели ✨ Сегодня забежала в Слой 🩵 Оказывается, если оплатить завтрак через Т-pay, ребята дарят сладкую

40🥰6🐳3🔥1

25 Jun 2026, 14:59 UTC579 views44 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

РБК недавно выпустили мой материал, где я рассказала про трансформации, которые приносят деньги: как внедрить изменения в крупной корпорации, чтобы они окупились в первый год. Вообще это очень сложная и неоднозначная тема, потому что в это обычно никто не верит и когда что-то происходит массивное и сложное — первоначальные цели забываются, тратятся огромные бюджеты и не всегда мы приходим к тому, что изначально закл

31🔥85

23 Jun 2026, 09:46 UTC520 views44 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В прошлом году я писала про навыки, которые помогают строить карьеру. Всё же мне кажется, что это актуально во все времени и почаще себе стоит об этом напоминать. ➡️ Небольшая предыстория: Как-то я участвовала в одной из программ Маши Бразговской, где поднималась тема построения карьеры. Это было не про "быстрее, выше и сильнее", а про более глубинные и психотерапевтические штуки. Мне это откликнулось, потому что не

16🍾16💯11🔥1

8 Jun 2026, 19:56 UTC789 views60 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Совсем неприлично, что 1,5 мес ничего не постила в канале 😅 А столько всего хочется рассказать ❤️ 1️⃣На прошлой неделе в Питере проходил Т-двор 💛 (фотоотчет прикладываю). Я всегда люблю ходить на такие мероприятия с целью или намерением. Иначе зачем оно всё, правильно?) 🖇пообщалась с нашими партнёрами (МФО и Банки), с которыми мы сейчас выстраиваем долгосрочное партнерство в части платежей и погашения кредитов в Т

34🔥1610

29 Apr 2026, 16:11 UTC≈1,120 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026

IT-world недавно приходили и мы пообщались о том, а что вообще происходит с внутренними ИТ-решениями сейчас, могут ли они становиться драйверами роста корпорации? Мой заочный ответ — конечно, да! А чуть подробнее я рассказала в статье 🖇что вообще такое внутренние продукты 🖇как считается экономика и как затраты могут работать на результат 🖇как внутренние продукты становятся точками роста (спойлер: примеры известных

🔥20107

20 Apr 2026, 15:13 UTC≈1,210 views53 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Недавно у нас прошла закрытая конференция в Доме русского бильярда, где мы приглашали наших ключевых партнеров, чтобы рассказать про вектор развития Платежей в Т на ближайшие годы. Покажу мини-фотоотчет — давно я тут не делилась таким ❤️ Я выступала в секции Банки и МФО, где рассказывала про свой продукт и как у нас развивается Кредитная сфера (мы хотим сделать для клиента самой главной точкой взаимодействия с кред

32🔥108❤‍🔥2🥰1

2 Apr 2026, 17:47 UTC≈1,230 views69 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Всё никак не доходят руки рассказать, куда я вышла и как у меня обстоят карьерные делишки Сразу после январских праздников я нырнула в чудный мир финтеха. Вышла я в Daily Banking, команда Платежей и развиваю уже третий месяц Погашение кредитов других банков. А точнее перезапускаю это направление. Решила немного порефлексировать: 🖇"нельзя дважды войти в одну и ту же реку" — очень даже можно, наверно, это было самое

43🔥168🍾2

6 Mar 2026, 06:26 UTC≈1,350 views62 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сейчас я реже пишу, поэтому спасибо, что всё равно остаетесь и читаете ❤️ 1,5 месяца я уже в новой команде и ещё много всего нужно сделать: добить стратегию моего продукта, все инициативы обсчитать и защитить на 2026, довыстроить процессы в команде, договориться со всеми стейкхолдерами и смежными командами. 🌪🌪🌪 — если можно описать одним жестом :) Но интересно другое: недавно я словила себя на мысли, что я как будт

42🔥14💘6

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @techtalkswithmasha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,135,689 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Tech Talks with Masha” (@techtalkswithmasha), 2,069 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/techtalkswithmasha.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.