Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Tech, Story & More

@techstorymore

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

76subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001787407032
TypeChannel
Username@techstorymore
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/techstorymore

Growth

757675.56 August 2026 — 75 subscribers9 August 2026 — 75 subscribers13 August 2026 — 76 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 75–76 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 15:3576+1
9 Aug 2026, 21:0275no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:0475first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.3%
avg views ÷ 76 subscribers
Avg views / post
20.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
5.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (4 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total20
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 21:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🌚133.3%
👍133.3%
👏133.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTC20 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Leggendo i commenti sulla decisione di alcune realtà di passare da PayPal a Satispay, mi sono chiesto: è meglio fare un piccolo passo o aspettare un grande salto? Qualche mese fa, su Mastodon, ho discusso con un utente che sosteneva che Linux non fosse sufficiente per raggiungere l’indipendenza tecnologica. Ora mi ritrovo in una situazione simile: sempre più organizzazioni stanno aprendo le donazioni su Satispay e ch

👍1

10 Jul 2026, 09:36 UTC60 viewsread 9 August 2026

La fine della democrazia Su questo canale ho provato a tenervi informati su diverse cose, vi ho informato (spero) ogni volta che #ChatControl vedeva una novità, ma questa volta non l'ho fatto e me ne rammarico, perché questa volta ce l'hanno fatta. Il 3 aprile 2026 è scaduto Chat Control 1.0, il regolamento europeo per il monitoraggio delle chat private, il Parlamento ha negato per ben due volte il suo rinnovo e ha

23 Jun 2026, 08:04 UTC89 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

La gabbia dorata Nel mondo della tecnologia, se facciamo riferimento ad una gabbia dorata si pensa subito ad #Apple e al suo ecosistema troppo perfetto per essere reale e per poter garantire una facile uscita ai suoi utenti, eppure c'è una gabbia dorata che è ancora più chiusa da cui è davvero impossibile uscire, YouTube. Il social di #Google è la gabbia dorata per eccellenza, ormai nessuno capisce più come funzion

👏1

17 Jun 2026, 08:00 UTC59 viewsread 9 August 2026

Intel collabora con NVIDIA Sembra ormai fatte le due grandi aziende di #chip americane potrebbero collaborare per dar vita a un nuovo #Soc che sfrutti la potenza delle CPU #Intel e le prestazioni grafiche di #NVIDIA. La produzione sarebbe quasi sicuramente affidata a #TSMC andando a danneggiare l'immagine di Intel come fonderia. L'obiettivo principale sarebbe quello di creare un Soc per portatili x86 in attesa che

17 Jun 2026, 08:00 UTC51 viewsread 9 August 2026

Telegram oscurato Anche in India Telegram viene oscurato, a causa della diffusione sulla piattaforma di alcune domande del test nazionale di medicina. Il ban sarà di almeno una settimana per garantire il normale svolgimento del test. Secondo quanto emerge dalle dichiarazioni di Pavel Durov, Reliance, operatore di telecomunicazioni indiano, starebbe sabotando anche il traffico diretto verso paesi terzi rispetto all'

17 Jun 2026, 08:00 UTC41 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Basta commissioni sotto i 30€? Le associazioni di categorie e le banche dovrebbe essere giunte ad un accordo che prevede l'abbattimento delle commissioni sui piccoli pagamenti elettronici, soprattutto le transazioni sotto i 30€. L'accordo non vincolante e che non fissa i prezzi di mercato, dovrebbe ridurre a zero le commissioni sotto i 10€ e progressivamente andare a ridurre anche quelle sotto i 30€. Chiaramente qu

🌚1

15 Jun 2026, 08:02 UTC39 viewsread 9 August 2026

Microsoft elimina i badge Microsoft aumenta la capacità di tracking di Teams, ora infatti sarà possibile capire in base alla connessione Wifi in quale parte dell'ufficio è presente il dispositivo di un dipendente. Questo approccio chiaramente va a limitare notevolmente la #privacy dei dipendenti ma secondo Microsoft dovrebbe permettere la completa rimozione dei badge per segnare la propria presenza in ufficio. L'a

15 Jun 2026, 08:02 UTC39 viewsread 9 August 2026

Trump ci ricorda che dipendiamo da lui Nel corso del weekend, i nuovi modelli Claude Fable 5 e Mythos 5 sono diventati non disponibili in tutto il mondo a causa delle preoccupazioni del governo americano. I due modelli erano molto potenti soprattutto per quanto riguarda la cybersecurity, cosa che aveva già portato Anthropic a ritardarne l'uscita. Le cose che possiamo imparare sono due. La prima è l'intelligenza ar

10 Jun 2026, 08:32 UTC47 viewsread 9 August 2026

Apple e l'Europa Apple Intelligence non arriverà su iOS e iPadOS, ma su MacOS, per via del #DMA , il regolamento europeo che cerca di aumentare la concorrenza sui servizi. Apple Intelligence funziona solamente con la #AI di #Apple, mentre secondo i regolamenti europei avrebbe dovuto essere compatibile con qualunque modello. Cupertino ha chiesto 18 mesi per sviluppare un'interfaccia per le altre AI, ma l'UE ha negat

10 Jun 2026, 08:32 UTC39 viewsread 9 August 2026

SpaceX è pronta Negli ultimi mesi, xAI ha perso un po' di smalto nello sviluppo di modelli #AI ma è diventata un fornitore di datacenter, ora è pronta a farlo nello spazio. SpaceX ha presentato i nuovi satelliti AI1, dei datacenter spaziali con 150kW di potenza di calcolo. I nuovi satelliti comunicheranno tramite laser con la rete #Starlink. Secondo le stime di SpaceX, i nuovi satelliti verranno lanciati con Stars

10 Jun 2026, 08:32 UTC33 viewsread 9 August 2026

Meta ancora al centro dello scandalo Continuano gli scandali legati alla #privacy di Meta, questa volta ci sono al centro gli occhiali smart. Sembra infatti che la funzionalità di riconoscimento facciale sia stata rimossa in fretta e furia in quanto i dispositivi di Meta avrebbero archiviato i volti delle persone incontrate per applicare un riconoscimento facciale. Meta è corsa ai ripari, eliminando questa funzion

8 Jun 2026, 08:00 UTC30 viewsread 9 August 2026

Google misura la frequenza cardiaca dalla fotocamera Google sta lavorando per portare sempre più funzionalità riguardanti la salute delle persone, Fitbit ha portato diverse novità negli ultimi mesi e ora l'azienda i Moutain View punta a fare un aggiornamento per tutto il mondo #Android. Sfruttando la fotocamera anteriore ed un piccolo modello #AI locale, sarebbe infatti possibile misurare la frequenza cardiaca degl

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @techstorymore. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 811,789 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Tech, Story & More” (@techstorymore), 76 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/techstorymore.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.