Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Techno-motherhood

@technomotherhood

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

266subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001196380907
TypeChannel
Username@technomotherhood
DescriptionАвтоматизация репродуктивного труда/техно-материнство
Created22 February 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/technomotherhood

Growth

2667 Aug 2026, 04:08 — 266 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 04:18 — 266 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 04:087 Aug 2026, 04:18
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 265–267 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 04:18266no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:08266first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 11 May 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
125
Videos
2
Links
57

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

93 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6266.7%
💔1111.8%
🔥66.45%
💋44.30%
💯44.30%
👀22.15%
👍22.15%
😁11.08%
🫡11.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 93reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2024 to 9 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 May 2026, 21:44 UTC141 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @dmshandr

Надо сказать, таких рецепции и прочтения у меня еще не было. Мне кажется, нужно много смелости и честности, так написать о черной военной книжечке https://syg.ma/@maria-bikbulatova/frontovaya-ikona-bez-boga

💔4

6 May 2026, 19:34 UTC218 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Возможно вы подзапарились читать критику левых, но это то, что меня занимало последние 4 года войны. В частности: почему левая реакция такая странная. И вот почему: https://syg.ma/@media-resistance-group/krasnyy-sprut

2💔2🫡1

27 Dec 2025, 20:25 UTC233 viewsread 7 August 2026

Написала сюда свои некоторые выводы и вопросы, которые удивляют уже 4 года. А вообще, прочитав книгу Волина "Неизвестная Революция" - мне реально интересно, как можно продолжать защищать и вдохновляться троцкизмом.

27 Dec 2025, 20:25 UTC319 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @avtonomorg

Колониализм и российские левые #свободная_новость От редакции: у коллектива медиа-группы АД нет единого мнения насчет данного материала, для части редакции ряд его положений спорны. Это текст написан с анархистских позиций. Он пытается поставить давно наболевшие вопросы к левым российским оппозиционным силам и поднять дискуссию о том, насколько могут быть связаны прогрессивные левые и деколониальные движения на чет

🔥4

24 Dec 2025, 16:52 UTC322 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Марк Ломбарди один из моих любимых художников, который работал с анализом сложных связей и данных. В 2000 его нашли повешенным в гостиничном номере, списав на самоубийство. Известно что следили не только за ним, но и за галереей в нью йорке, где состоялась большая выставка его работ. Прослушку, слежку и давление подтверждает галерист/куратор, в фильме о Марке Ломбарди. Мне он интересен тем, что его "повествователь

💔5

31 Oct 2025, 16:10 UTC233 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @lifeinspace_rymbu

Они манипулируют нашей надеждой на лучшее будущее На днях одна из ведущих левых политиков в UK, Зара Султана, сделала заявление, в котором выступила за полное прекращение военной и политической поддержки Украины. Она рассказала, что ее убедили в этом украинцы и россияне – лидеры "Союз постсоветских левых" (PSL) и коалиции "Мир снизу" – во время их встречи на интернациональном антивоенном съезде в Париже. В партиза

6😁1

27 Aug 2025, 17:38 UTC341 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Книга старая, но актуальная. "нашим друзьям" невидимый комитет 2016 год издания. Глава" fuck off google"

10💯4

27 Aug 2025, 17:37 UTC322 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

"Технофилия и технофобия - адская, парочка, связанная общим враньем о том, будто такая вещь как техника вообще, существует. Дескать, все в человеческой жизни можно разделить на технику и её отсутствие. Не тут то было: достаточно лишь увидеть, насколько несовершенен человеческий детеныш при появлении на свет, как долго он учится передвигаться и говорить, и сразу становится понятно, что его отношения с миром - вовсе н

4🔥2👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @technomotherhood. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 843,467 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Techno-motherhood” (@technomotherhood), 266 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/technomotherhood.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.