https://t.me/gramevents_bot?startapp=ref_38977 Join Gram Events and earn TON! 💎 5 Refer get 3 Ton

Channel
TECHNICAL AASHISH🤑
@technicalAashish
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
136subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001717574136 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @technicalAashish |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 17 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/technicalAashish |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 136 | +2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:00 | 134 | no change |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 134 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 26 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 9s
- Average length
- 9s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 January 2025 to 9 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
BREAKING: 🇮🇳 INDIA’s New Income Tax Bill Introduces Unprecedented Surveillance — Especially for CRYPTO Users Under the new provisions, authorities can now legally access: → Your emails → Social media accounts → Bank statements → And even trading platforms Recent investigations used WhatsApp chats to uncover ₹90 crore in undisclosed crypto assets — and identify those involved.
PAWS has officially has been approved and listed to CoinGecko 🤑🤑 Listing for trading on CEX, soon!
Omg My payment received 💸💸🤯🤯🤯 Fully New Crypto Loot Web Launched SignUp Bonus : 2$ Per Refer : 0.6$ Register Link : https://efsanetr.com/en_US/internal/register/?inviteCode=OS1UCD Refer Code : OS1UCD 📌 Register Karke 5-20 Refer Karlo Then Adress Add Karlo 24hrs Me Withdraw Mil Jayega Wallet Pe
PAWS Listing Postponed 🐾
Paws CEX Pre Deposit Closed ❌ Onchain Claim Available on Listing Time...
Paws claim krlena aj last hai https://paws.community/app?tab=claim
PAWS Withdraw Process 🔥 https://paws.community/app?tab=claim
$PAWS Claiming to Exchange Starts on 13th March [ Today ] 🔥 $PAWS Claiming Process supports Bybit & Bitget Exchange 📈 ⛽️ [No need any Sol fees directly you can deposit token on exchange] ✔️ Claim of your $PAWS will be available via PAWS Web:
Paws Listing Date 18 March🤑🤑
😱 $PAWS Not Eligible wale jisne form fill nahi kiya h kar lena 👍 https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSd3gaG32wvE4XL9nLqAerJF01J91fuIM1OUjTnp-HqOgkbitQ/viewform
✨ $PAWS Allocation Check ▪︎ https://paws.community/app?tab=claim
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @technicalAashish. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@technicalAashish named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 18 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ssyadavsirtelegram · 45,190
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
@ReasoningbyAkashChaturvedi · 33,357
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 4 September 2026
@pawansirenglish · 59,398
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 22 August 2026
@Reasoning_Life_By_Deepak_Sir · 69,916
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 20 August 2026
@preetimamexampurnotes · 87,931
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 17 August 2026
@jbclassessgnr · 21,793
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 22 September 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TECHNICAL AASHISH🤑” (@technicalAashish), 136 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/technicalAashish.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.