Today, #Bitcoin ’s 20W MA crossed above its 200W for the first time ever. Could mean nothing. Just worth noting.
Signed TechDev

Channel
@techdevinfo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Cite this entry
303subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001665172481 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @techdevinfo |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 17 February 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/techdevinfo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 303 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 305 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 304 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 304 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 17 February 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Today, #Bitcoin ’s 20W MA crossed above its 200W for the first time ever. Could mean nothing. Just worth noting.
Signed TechDev
We are apparently at the part where the ones who were wrong in 2021 because “the cycle”, are now certain of no new ATHs for years because “the cycle”. I used to be one. I remember when my belief in a predictable 4-year heartbeat of blow-off tops that would make everyone rich, made me allergic to other interpretations. Perhaps we are in the same macro impulse wave that began in 2019, and are seeing a similar early s…
Signed TechDev
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed TechDev
Next we'll find out if July 2023 ≈ Nov 2020. #Bitcoin
Signed TechDev
Same thing. Primary until invalidated. $BTC
Signed TechDev
I've heard the left side move called a "smooth" #bitcoin parabola. I can promise you it did not feel like one if you were checking Twitter and charts every day.
Signed TechDev
Despite larger market cap, bigger players, and different supply dynamics... I still see consistent impulsive and corrective patterns over #Bitcoin 's history. Those factors, among others, likely contribute to the lengthening of these patterns.
Signed TechDev
To me the market makes much more sense when viewed as impulse/correction rather than bull/bear. Some corrections are downwards (zig-zag), others are sideways (flat/triangle). Which ones you want to swing, and which ones you want to ride/accumulate is entirely up to you.
Signed TechDev
Appreciate those who called out my flippant tweet. Bear/bull is arbitrary and tf dependent. I vented frustration at those who lack respect for long term strategies/convictions and flip-flip for clout. In the process I denigrated those with shorter-term views. I apologize.
Signed TechDev
The self-congratulating short-term bear posters last night as bombs fell are suddenly a lot quieter. Day still hasn’t closed. Week hasn’t closed. Month hasn’t closed. Year hasn’t closed. Patience FFS.
Signed TechDev
Wild day all around. My best to everyone. ❤️
Signed TechDev
Whatever happens to the markets in the short-term will be noise in the long-term. Prayers for the Ukranians and all human beings tonight. People always come first.
Signed TechDev
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @techdevinfo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TechDev NewsLetter” (@techdevinfo), 303 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/techdevinfo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.