2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 220–222 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 17:38
221
no change
16 Aug 2026, 18:31
221
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 22 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 08s
Average length
23s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
140 reactions across 8 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
70
50.0%
🔥
29
20.7%
🥰
17
12.1%
👍
8
5.71%
👏
4
2.86%
👌
3
2.14%
🎉
2
1.43%
😢
2
1.43%
🦄
2
1.43%
💯
1
0.714%
🗿
1
0.714%
🙊
1
0.714%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 140reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 22 November 2024 to 31 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 9 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @teamtattoosaratov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 November 2024 to 31 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Друзья, с наступающим Новым годом ☺️
Уже через пол часа мы подводим итоги нашего конкурса где вы выиграете бесплатный сеанс у каждого из наших мастеров, а именно:
1. Руслан - мастер по пирсингу и татуировке
https://t.me/bigdik93
2. Алина - мастер по цветной татуировке, неотраду и графике
https://t.me/goldbergtattoo228
3. Паша - мастер по тату, графика
https://t.me/JackBobker
4. Алена - мастер по тату, графика…
🔥 КОНКУРС🔥
Всем привет, с вами коллектив студии «Больная тема»
Мы запускаем новогодний розыгрыш подарочных сертификатов💉🖤
🎁 Призы:
— 🎨 Подарочные сертификаты на бесплатные сеансы от мастеров нашей студии
📌 Условия участия простые:
1️⃣ Подпишись на наш канал в телеграмм
2️⃣ Нажми 👉 УЧАСТВОВАТЬ
3️⃣ Получи персональную ссылку и пригласи хотя бы 1 друга, чтобы он тоже подписался (бот сам всё считает).
4️⃣ Оставь св…
#гольдберг@teamtattoosaratov
— С наступившим Вас 25 годом, годом змеи, ярким и насыщенным как этот дракон для моей модели Алины.
Мы делали его очень кропотливо, это первый мой большой цветной проект, который мы будем продолжать в полноценную штанину 🖤
Записывайтесь на январь ко мне и другим мастерам нашей замечательной студии, всех Вас очень ждем!
@bloomflowersss
Дорогие клиенты и друзья студии Dark Light! 🤍
От всей нашей команды поздравляем вас с Новым годом!
Пусть этот год станет для вас светлым, полным ярких событий и смелых решений. Пусть ваши татуировки и пирсинг вдохновляют вас на новые свершения, а маникюр дарит уверенность в себе.
Мы благодарны за то, что вы выбираете нашу студию. Мы всегда стремимся к совершенству, чтобы каждый наш клиент остался доволен результат…
#тульское_быдло
Декабрь начался вот с такой метОчки
🕐Начали в октябре, закончили в декабре - норм/стрем? 🕐
Для записи на тату, жду у себя в ЛС @suck_and_be_happy 🦊
Тату по акции !!
Так как меня давненько не было, хочу предложить вам эскизы по акции
Все работы модельные от 2000k до 5000k ~
За деталями работы пишите лично 🤍⤵️
@polina_tattoosaratov
#тульское_быдло
Девочки, мальчики,
оближешь пальчики...
Вот такого другалечка сегодня набили 🐿
Для записи на таточку, жду у себя в ЛС @suck_and_be_happy 🦊
🥰7❤5
Signed Alice Logoonova
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @teamtattoosaratov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
3
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
3
vacant every time we have ever looked
@teamtattoosaratov named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@dgreinerr named in 1 post, 18 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
@jackbobker named in 1 post, 18 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
@ksenij751 named in 1 post, 18 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Дубай Новости @dubaiz · 123,276 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“"Больная тема" | Тату Саратов” (@teamtattoosaratov), 221 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/teamtattoosaratov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.