Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐓 - π’πŽπ”π‹ πŸ–€

Channel

𝐓 - π’πŽπ”π‹ πŸ–€

@teamsoul7

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

461subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003873405907
TypeChannel
Username@teamsoul7
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/teamsoul7

Growth

4614714668 August 2026 β€” 471 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 471 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 461 subscribers8 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 460–473 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 20:25461-10
8 Aug 2026, 04:46471no change
8 Aug 2026, 01:30471first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
10.8%
avg views Γ· 461 subscribers
Avg views / post
50.0
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.5%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (13 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total850
Reactions total42
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

47 reactions across 9 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀1838.3%
πŸ—Ώ1021.3%
πŸ₯°612.8%
πŸ”₯36.38%
❀‍πŸ”₯24.26%
πŸ’‹24.26%
😈24.26%
🀩24.26%
😁12.13%
😍12.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 47reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 17:41 UTC10 viewsread 8 August 2026

NOTE : Cause open krne ki timing Dhyan rakhna or creator premium meta hi lena Or jitna chota text kr sakte ho utna chota text use krna Or jis phone ka ip ekdam thik ho jisme ek bhi id ban na hui ho usme meta le kr cause dalna πŸ€©πŸ€©πŸ”΅

6 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTC11 viewsread 8 August 2026

HERE IS UR DISABLE UNBAN METHOD πŸ‘» 1. Use a phone that has never been used to create or log into any Instagram account. Make sure the device has a clean and stable IP/network. 2. Install Instagram on that phone and create a new Instagram account. 3. Subscribe to Meta Verified for Creators (choose the Creator plan only). 4. After verification, contact Meta Support regarding your disabled account. 5. For the best …

6 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTC11 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Soo disabled account unban method deta hu free ho kr πŸ˜‹πŸ₯€ SB apna account ub kr lena 😭

πŸ—Ώ2❀1😍1

6 Aug 2026, 14:24 UTC12 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Bc bhul jata hu method bhi dena h πŸ«ͺπŸ€™πŸ»

❀1πŸ”₯1πŸ₯°1

4 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC21 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

20+ react do instant ban method abhi de deta hu πŸ˜πŸ€™

❀3πŸ”₯2πŸ’‹1πŸ—Ώ1πŸ₯°1😈1

4 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC62 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Konsa method du? Ab

  1. Disabled unban method...57%
  2. Instant ban method...43%
  3. Suspend unban method...14%

The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

❀3🀩2πŸ—Ώ1πŸ₯°1

1 Aug 2026, 13:18 UTC47 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

❀4πŸ—Ώ1πŸ₯°1

28 Jul 2026, 17:41 UTC57 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Abhi bhi tum log ka ip Ban he kya? πŸ™‚

❀1

26 Jul 2026, 18:02 UTC70 viewsread 8 August 2026

INSTANT BAN METHOD 😊 Creat new fresh acc - Find ur target - Nd rep : 3x scam 1 2x scam 2 2x nude 1/2 1x vio 3 Booooooommmmmmmmm ur target Got banned in 48 hr also live 🀩🀩 @lxrdsoul 🌟

22 Jul 2026, 01:45 UTC71 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @voucher01

Permanent unban 3 to 7 days Mm accept Reason integrity Lmk @meta_supportt

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @teamsoul7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTCAnonymous Poll21 voters

Konsa method du? Ab

  1. Disabled unban method...57%
  2. Instant ban method...43%
  3. Suspend unban method...14%

The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only β€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank β€” 638,290 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions β€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπ“ - π’πŽπ”π‹ πŸ–€β€ (@teamsoul7), 461 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/teamsoul7.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.