👨🔧👩🔧Команда робототехников
🥇🥇Двукратные чемпионы России в Битве роботов (2016 /2019)
🥉Полуфиналисты Robowars India (2024)
Участники международных соревнований и ТВ шоу 🇮🇳🇨🇳🇺🇸
Created
Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 170–172 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 14:47
171
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:37
171
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
89.9%
avg views ÷ 171 subscribers
Avg views / post
154
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
15 (1 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
1,230
Reactions total
108
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
334
Videos
247
Links
43
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 15s
Average length
19s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
193 reactions across 15 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
35
18.1%
🔥
22
11.4%
❤🔥
20
10.4%
custom 5312026254751313956
13
6.74%
custom 5312490871428490076
12
6.22%
custom 5416039998904345140
12
6.22%
custom 5328201028573609878
10
5.18%
👀
9
4.66%
👍
9
4.66%
custom 5355198673305216688
8
4.15%
custom 5328039533508312759
7
3.63%
😁
5
2.59%
🤣
5
2.59%
🤪
4
2.07%
custom 5350766318595368681
3
1.55%
custom 5440582511480547106
3
1.55%
custom 5256103272296499934
2
1.04%
🙈
2
1.04%
🦄
2
1.04%
custom 5345842877324861624
1
0.518%
9 further kinds
9
4.66%
Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 193reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 15 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @teamsolarbot. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
В этом году Настя является наставником команды SOLARBOT Junior 🐲,
которая состоит только из девчонок
(так вышло случайно 😁)
"Быть в составе детской команды намного прикольнее, оказывается 😁
Можно выступать в чудаковатом костюме, и не переживать, что кто-то тебя осудит)" - говорит Настя
Скоро мы вам расскажем, почему Джуниоры будут в скелетах драконов 🐉
Это неспроста 😉
#solarbotjunior
Вот, братия, рёв наш: от ремней мы отрёклись, как от трусости!
Сковали мы новую колесницу, дабы фрикционы обрели силу!
Первое же испытание обернулось позором, как битва без меча!
Видеяние же сияет: PiP со старой ходовой, где синие круги, и PiP с новой, где оранжевые диски сияют, как золото Гримнира!
Вот так мы планируем приехать на Битву роботов 😂
А если без шуток, то мы придерживаемся позиции, чтобы на каждый поединок у нас стоял запасной готовый робот
Чтобы в перерывах ни о чём не переживать, не пытаться отремонтировать робота за 20 мин..
Лучше это время потратить на отдых и общение с коллегами по ремзоне 😊
Вот бы и в 110ках была возможность придерживаться такой позиции 😁
Ну что
Вы хорошо потрудились
(не так хорошо, конечно, как когда хотели увидеть гидросистему, но тоже неплохо 😁)
Вот так выглядит первая версия спиннера на нового робота 🙃
Тренировочка по расписанию ✔️
Тренируемся на старом выжившем PiPе, пока новая версия в разработке)
Рассказывайте, как у вас дела с готовностью к Битве роботов? 🅰
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @teamsolarbot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐓𝐞𝐚𝐦 𝐒𝐎𝐋𝐀𝐑𝐁𝐎𝐓” (@teamsolarbot), 171 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/teamsolarbot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.