πππππππππ New bot lauπ?? Fast Reaction do ππ https://t.me/+HCDdYDCljK85Nzll https://t.me/+HCDdYDCljK85Nzll https://t.me/+HCDdYDCljK85Nzll https://t.me/+HCDdYDCljK85Nzll
Signed Aroqe

Channel
@team_hallow
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
228subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003471231787 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @team_hallow |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 21 February 2026β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/team_hallow |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:36 | 228 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 231 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 235 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 237 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 February 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
30 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 20 | 66.7% | |
| π€£ | 8 | 26.7% | |
| π | 2 | 6.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 30reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 February 2026 to 14 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
πππππππππ New bot lauπ?? Fast Reaction do ππ https://t.me/+HCDdYDCljK85Nzll https://t.me/+HCDdYDCljK85Nzll https://t.me/+HCDdYDCljK85Nzll https://t.me/+HCDdYDCljK85Nzll
Signed Aroqe
ππWatch daily leaks π₯΅ @newvidoleaksbot π€ @newvidoleaksbot π€ Hardc0re πDaily mM S in hereπ₯΅
Signed Aroqe
Tumhare liye ek gift hain @znoqf par message kro
Signed Aroqe
ππWatch daily leaks π₯΅ @newvidoleaksbot π€ @newvidoleaksbot π€ Hardc0re πDaily mM S in hereπ₯΅
Signed Aroqe
@NewTgStarBot @NewTgStarBot @NewTgStarBot @NewTgStarBot NEW TELIGRAM STAR BOT REAL BOT HAIN MENE BHI TRY KR LIYA TUM BHI KAR LO JALDI KYUKI ABHI KAM USER HAIN ππ₯
Signed Aroqe
Kiska giveaway kru π
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Signed Aroqe
Join and share for giveaways ππ€
Signed Aroqe
https://t.me/+sPjyVE39JNliMDk0 Vote obito and send ss in dm Then claim your gift π @zonqf
Signed Aroqe
Messages in this channel will no longer be automatically deleted
Messages in this channel will be automatically deleted after 1 day
Hi
β€2
https://t.me/teamfinxzz Gys join for more updates end giveaways always trusted End secure so fast join π
β€2
Signed Aroqe
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @team_hallow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollβs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Kiska giveaway kru π
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only β there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionβs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionβs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 February 2026 to 14 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank β 363,196 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@team_hallow named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπ°π©βπππππΰΌπππππππ©βπ΄ββ οΈπͺπͺβ (@team_hallow), 228 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/team_hallow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.