Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

43; Tech

@team_43tech

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

727subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002751169835
TypeChannel
Username@team_43tech
DescriptionКанал технических подразделений системы маркировки Честный ЗНАК. Делимся тем, как устроена разработка, эксплуатация и безопасность одной из крупнейших цифровых платформ в стране. Плюс немного хаоса (как и положено в IT). Новости, люди, инсайды, IT-движ.
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/team_43tech

Growth

7278 Aug 2026, 14:31 — 727 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 14:45 — 727 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 14:318 Aug 2026, 14:45
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 726–728 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 14:45727no change
8 Aug 2026, 14:31727first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 2 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
76.6%
avg views ÷ 727 subscribers
Avg views / post
557
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held9 (2 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total2,228
Reactions total200
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
182
Videos
90
Links
45

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 19s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

419 reactions across 9 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10625.3%
🔥8520.3%
🎉5713.6%
👍5513.1%
👏5112.2%
174.06%
👾153.58%
💘102.39%
😁61.43%
🤓51.19%
🆒40.955%
👀30.716%
👌20.477%
👨‍💻10.239%
🤗10.239%
🤩10.239%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 419reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
23
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 9 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @team_43tech. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC314 views41 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤖 Trust, but verify ИИ не врёт. Он очень убедительно ошибается. Именно поэтому любой ответ нейросети стоит воспринимать как черновик, а не как истину в первой инстанции. Три простых шага, которые помогут быстро понять, где факт, а где – красивая галлюцинация.

11👍7🎉6🔥6👏4👾32👀1

31 Jul 2026, 09:00 UTC505 views51 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

🤖 Инженеры начали создавать шрифты, которые не умеет читать ИИ За последнее время появилось сразу несколько экспериментальных проектов, цель которых – сделать текст понятным человеку, но максимально сложным для нейросетей. Один из самых необычных – Ghost Font. Попробовать можно здесь. Вместо обычных букв он использует движение, шум и ложные элементы. Для человека сообщение читается практически сразу, а современные

👍13🔥96🎉6👾6👏5🤓41

27 Jul 2026, 09:00 UTC749 views67 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

☀️ Отпуск начинается с новой аватарки В самый разгар отпускного сезона собрали небольшой пак аватарок для всех, кто уже отдыхает или только собирается в отпуск. Если ближайшие планы – синкаться с морем, анализировать закаты, тестировать качество пляжей и компилировать витамин D, то одна из этих аватарок точно для вас 😎

27🔥13👍7🎉6👏5😁42🆒2

21 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC660 views41 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📊 Настроение недели — в трёх словах В этой таблице спрятались слова, знакомые каждому айтишнику. Найдите первые три, которые вам попались. Всего здесь спрятано 18 слов. Сколько найдёте вы? 😄

12🎉7👍5👏4👾42🔥2😁2

8 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC794 views54 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Встречаемся на ULCAMP’26 С 17 по 19 июля в Ульяновске, в эко-парке «Русский берег», пройдёт одна из самых атмосферных IT-конференций лета – ULCAMP’26. 18 июля (суббота) в 12:40 приглашаем на секцию «ЛЮДИ & IT», где выступит Валерия Ефремова, старший специалист по автоматизированному тестированию Честного ЗНАКа. 🎤 На конференции Валерия представит доклад «Ситуационное лидерство SLII для тех, кто в окопе: как за 1

18🔥10🎉9👍8👏5💘21🆒1

7 Jul 2026, 14:00 UTC613 views38 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

📼 DevOps Meetup 43;Tech: aftermovie Немного инженерной атмосферы, живых обсуждений и кадров с нашего митапа. Следующая встреча уже в работе. Не переключайтесь ⚙️

👏11🔥87🎉4👍4💘21🆒1

6 Jul 2026, 09:00 UTC567 views46 reactions4 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

📷 DevOps Meetup 43;Tech: лучшие моменты Доклады, вопросы, обсуждения, нетворкинг и немного закулисья – собрали самые яркие кадры с нашего митапа в одном альбоме. 🔗 https://disk.yandex.ru/d/TNQRm8jn6EMRfw Спасибо всем, кто стал частью этого вечера. Ищите себя на фотографиях и сохраняйте лучшие кадры 💛

🔥9🎉8👏86👍54💘3👌2

3 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC780 views31 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

🎥 Запись DevOps Meetup 43;Tech уже доступна! Если вы не смогли присоединиться к митапу или хотите пересмотреть доклады – самое время. Мы уже опубликовали запись мероприятия: ▶️ YouTube https://www.youtube.com/live/L52Ej7I0Rrk?si=ZE-Ifdd2NyxyskmI ▶️ VK Видео https://vkvideo.ru/video-227246602_456239022 Приятного просмотра 💛

🔥106🎉53👍3👏2👾1💘1

2 Jul 2026, 18:38 UTC581 views50 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

✔️ Meetup completed successfully! Спасибо всем, кто сегодня был с нами! Три доклада, десятки вопросов, много профессиональных обсуждений и ещё больше обмена опытом. Записи выступлений уже в работе. Совсем скоро поделимся ссылками, а пока – спасибо за этот вечер и до встречи на следующих митапах 43;Tech! 💛

🔥1813👏7🎉6👍31👾1🤗1

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @team_43tech. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 291,930 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“43; Tech” (@team_43tech), 727 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/team_43tech.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.