Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🎓 nixlis channel

Channel

🎓 nixlis channel

@tdynixlis

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

342subscribers

-25 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003005200166
TypeChannel
Username@tdynixlis
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tdynixlis

Growth

342367354.58 August 2026 — 367 subscribers8 August 2026 — 366 subscribers16 August 2026 — 353 subscribers24 August 2026 — 344 subscribers31 August 2026 — 342 subscribers8 August 202631 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 23 days, net -25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 338–371 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 20:36342-2
24 Aug 2026, 01:08344-9
16 Aug 2026, 20:22353-13
8 Aug 2026, 21:20366-1
8 Aug 2026, 09:02367first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 13 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
36s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,019 reactions across 14 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 521082988029545369223423.0%
custom 526054608525173910919519.1%
custom 541829648023238957511311.1%
custom 5260284066476874893817.95%
custom 5334942868802904706585.69%
custom 5422447162397058750535.20%
custom 5420387158642941586444.32%
🍓383.73%
custom 5420200619623346950373.63%
💔353.43%
💯282.75%
custom 5210727002943811531262.55%
custom 5260672907046049612141.37%
custom 533231221851397637290.883%
🕊90.883%
custom 529179951429269829280.785%
custom 545859753705527520580.785%
💘80.785%
custom 545839552756346093760.589%
custom 541822767056134188440.393%
6 further kinds111.08%

Custom emoji. 15 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,019 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 13 November 2025 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
50
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 14 we hold a reading for · 50%
Most on one post
35
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tdynixlis. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 November 2025 to 19 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 May 2026, 12:38 UTC≈1,810 views68 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 521082988029545369245💘6custom 53349428688029047066🕊3custom 54182964802323895753💔2custom 52602840664768748932💯1

28 Mar 2026, 14:32 UTC≈1,870 views49 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

пин ✅ кто хочет так же - @nixlis

custom 521082988029545369225custom 54224471623970587507custom 54583955275634609376custom 54182276705613418844custom 53349428688029047062custom 54182964802323895752💔1custom 52602840664768748931

1 Feb 2026, 19:26 UTC≈2,780 views114 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

катка только началась, а ты уже понял что проиграл

custom 521082988029545369277custom 521072700294381153117custom 52602840664768748939custom 54182964802323895753custom 53349428688029047062custom 54202006196233469502custom 54653786676453888532💘1

8 Jan 2026, 14:02 UTC≈3,550 views117 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ура макарон пин

custom 541829648023238957542custom 521082988029545369231🍓14💔9custom 52107270029438115319custom 54202006196233469507custom 52602840664768748932💘1

23 Dec 2025, 18:14 UTC≈3,780 views96 reactions9 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

лут

custom 542038715864294158644custom 526028406647687489318custom 521082988029545369217custom 54182964802323895758custom 54224471623970587504custom 53349428688029047062custom 54202006196233469502custom 53798344983408878521

30 Nov 2025, 14:55 UTC≈3,090 views73 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

соси член мой фут

custom 521082988029545369232💯19custom 542244716239705875013custom 54202006196233469505custom 54182964802323895754

30 Nov 2025, 13:40 UTC≈3,140 views99 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 526028406647687489336custom 526054608525173910931custom 541829648023238957512custom 52108298802954536927custom 54224471623970587506custom 53349428688029047063💯2custom 54202006196233469502

28 Nov 2025, 15:29 UTC≈3,240 views65 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 541829648023238957524custom 526067290704604961214custom 526054608525173910911custom 526028406647687489310custom 53349428688029047064🍓2

28 Nov 2025, 12:31 UTC≈2,880 views72 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 526054608525173910941custom 541829648023238957515custom 53349428688029047068custom 58750920219657538834custom 52602840664768748933🔥1

16 Nov 2025, 18:23 UTC≈4,470 views97 reactions35 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

+фан

custom 526054608525173910957custom 542244716239705875016custom 542020061962334695013custom 54585975370552752054custom 53323122185139763723💔2custom 52917995142926982922

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @tdynixlis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 573,162 of 1,629,452 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🎓 nixlis channel” (@tdynixlis), 342 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tdynixlis.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.