Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TAZZZ CRYPTO CALLS

Channel

TAZZZ CRYPTO CALLS

@tazzzcryptocalls

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

29subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002412929737
TypeChannel
Username@tazzzcryptocalls
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 October 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 7 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/tazzzcryptocalls

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2529277 August 2026 — 26 subscribers8 August 2026 — 25 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25 subscribers15 August 2026 — 26 subscribers13 September 2026 — 27 subscribers27 September 2026 — 29 subscribers7 August 202627 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 51 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24–30 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Sept 2026, 06:5729+2
13 Sept 2026, 19:5927+1
15 Aug 2026, 00:5426+1
11 Aug 2026, 10:0425no change
8 Aug 2026, 16:0525-1
7 Aug 2026, 17:4926first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

30 Jan 2026, 23:29 UTC71 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

conviction recognizes conviction 😍 Remus, the well known $WHITEWHALE chad already replied and noticed $MIAU. You know whats coming next when market recovers https://x.com/taz_crypt0/status/2017379156263374894?s=20

29 Jan 2026, 15:29 UTC52 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @delugebuybotPhoto

MIAUDITATION Buy! 🟢🟢🟢🟢 🔀 0.03325 SOL ($3.91) 🔀 135 650.025 MIAU 👤 5iiULH...JSsV | Txn ⬆️ Position: 1% Up! 💸 Market Cap $28 822 📈 Chart ⏫ Trending ✳️ Events

27 Jan 2026, 15:54 UTC48 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Chart's looking good and about to pump up! https://gmgn.ai/sol/token/G5XEGLa671jtxKV4kaWjfcX7BBr8rru9VC1nEGawpump

27 Jan 2026, 15:44 UTC55 viewsread 11 August 2026

I personally aped here, I like the narrative. The killer of Copper Inu | Copper inu now is at 15m marketcap. This might be a runner too https://gmgn.ai/sol/token/G5XEGLa671jtxKV4kaWjfcX7BBr8rru9VC1nEGawpump

23 Jan 2026, 13:57 UTC51 viewsread 11 August 2026

riding the hype of Penguin Lore. 11.9k here. Still good entry and dev burned wallets I aped here: 8p9tGTqWJJ7nz77HRag3uueZS1J3PateWDJEhYSipump

17 Jan 2026, 20:15 UTCviews —

TAZZZ CRYPTO CALLS pinned «I don’t chase hype. I look for patterns: – builders who already proved it once – quiet execution – organic charts – low attention, real holders The best projects never ask for trust. They repeat behavior. By the time it’s obvious, the asymmetry is gone.…»

17 Jan 2026, 20:15 UTC49 viewsread 11 August 2026

I don’t chase hype. I look for patterns: – builders who already proved it once – quiet execution – organic charts – low attention, real holders The best projects never ask for trust. They repeat behavior. By the time it’s obvious, the asymmetry is gone. https://t.me/tazzzcryptocalls

14 Jan 2026, 15:49 UTC39 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Retweet, Repost leave a message and use our #MIAU $MIAU https://x.com/i/status/2011403462639342003

14 Jan 2026, 14:01 UTC28 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @delugebuybotPhoto

MIAUDITATION Buy! 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢 🔀 0.06266 SOL ($9) 🔀 336 970.798 MIAU 👤 HV1KXx...qP7K | Txn ⬆️ New Holder! 💸 Market Cap $26 737 📈 Chart ⏫ Trending ✳️ Events

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tazzzcryptocalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TAZZZ CRYPTO CALLS” (@tazzzcryptocalls), 29 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tazzzcryptocalls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.