佛山146/152 两小萝莉闺蜜 单个夜不过5k https://t.me/szluoli520/218
❤3

Channel
@taxiai5200
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
18subscribers
-14,234 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002637511029 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @taxiai5200 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/taxiai5200 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 19:20 | 18 | +11 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:42 | 7 | -14,687 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 02:19 | 14,694 | +5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:36 | 14,689 | +6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:13 | 14,683 | +10 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:36 | 14,673 | +19 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 14,654 | +19 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:25 | 14,635 | +1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:55 | 14,634 | +9 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:07 | 14,625 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 14,626 | +10 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:24 | 14,616 | +14 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 14,602 | +31 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 14,571 | +62 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 23:48 | 14,509 | +36 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:11 | 14,473 | +4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 14,469 | +4 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:52 | 14,465 | +67 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:49 | 14,398 | +12 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 14,386 | first reading |
26 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 26 (26 July 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 30,980 |
| Reactions total | 21 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 18:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
135 reactions across 22 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 114 | 84.4% | |
| 💩 | 7 | 5.19% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 4.44% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 2.22% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 1.48% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.48% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.741% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 135 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
佛山146/152 两小萝莉闺蜜 单个夜不过5k https://t.me/szluoli520/218
❤3
有骗子模仿我账号,骗取点链接,别信,我会笑。
#素人处女 深圳龙岗 视频聊了一下,重庆妹妹说想初换钱。5k卖第一次 初夜8k (可砍点) 看看你们有没兴趣的了。 (暂无,周末等反馈)
❤3
#吱吱 古灵精怪,健谈可爱,cos衣服多也还原(表弟测评) 吱吱小巧玲珑,颜值非常能打,而且很可爱嫩嫩的,唯一不足的是有一点黄黑皮。妹妹还十分温柔健谈,聊的很开心。先是女上位摇摇车,很在乎我的感受,捏着和她小小的身体不相符的奶子真的十分勾起性欲。到了我最爱的后入,妹妹的小穴十分精致,显得我稍微有点大。能感觉到妹妹觉得疼但是依然忍了下去。第二发我想着没体验过mmk试试,妹妹的手和口也不错,听说还有扑克牌和飞行棋可惜需要提前说下次再试了。总的来说非常不错,肯定会返 吱吱:@zhizhiwoaini
一个西格玛男人会剪好自己的指甲,吃上巧克力,带上玩具,然后包养一位学舞蹈18岁妹妹。 初见包养:https://t.me/taxiai5200/746 巧克力:https://t.me/taxiai5200/808
❤9
cos 还是好啊
❤6
深圳无敌好 资源多修车群主靠谱的老王 https://t.me/lwgeo 和老王开发的一个小程序小螃蟹,🦀 小螃蟹|真实测评 + 优惠券 + 积分白嫖 https://t.me/Crab_bbot?startapp=inv_6524070712 这小程序我玩一早上了很好玩哈哈哈哈
❤7
还是掏耳小姐姐好看 给好评加个v
❤1
#杭州 里面超多高颜值小姐姐 一位杭州频道主 https://t.me/mzhn1314
❤🔥3
#希希 cos (表弟测评) 还不错 22我觉得玩的可以 有cos和妹子聊了挺久妹子情绪价值给的挺足 妹子后面没课所以我们多待了一会 妹子服务这些都挺ok的。涨价后多了cos 不是为了cos去的话性价比一般,后悔没有早点去,不过现在cos多了也还行吧。
❤3
❤️#希希酱 🛵#深圳 上海 😘07 165/90 🐻c 🥰 💰1400p2500pp 包天8k起 ✈️联系: @datiechui090 ✈️双向: @datiechui_bot 🧧福利频道: https://t.me/xxflvlog
💩7🤣2❤1
早啊 阳光好刺眼
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @taxiai5200. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@taxiai5200 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“全国包养萝莉/处女/学妹(广告频道)” (@taxiai5200), 18 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/taxiai5200.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.