Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

深广萝莉少萝学院2.0

@szluoli520

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,452subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003768326705
TypeChannel
Username@szluoli520
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/szluoli520

Growth

3,4493,4523,450.514 Aug 2026, 22:16 — 3,449 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 06:35 — 3,452 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 22:1615 Aug 2026, 06:35
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,449–3,452 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 06:353,452+3
14 Aug 2026, 22:163,449first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.3%
avg views ÷ 3,452 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,560
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.136%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 6 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held6 (24 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total9,388
Reactions total8
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 22:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
19s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

8 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
787.5%
🔥112.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 06:28 UTC410 views0 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

#潼潼 #杭州 #深圳 07/150/88 🐻36E 07 童颜巨乳潼潼 个子娇小可抱操 下面特别紧水多 性格好懂配合 可sm/cosplay户外露出调教 接受程度高 皮肤细腻白皙 可全国飞线下 🚪99可线下 ✌️不过7k,天不过9k 联系:@jinshuimu16668 双向:@EVALCL02_bot

14 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC≈2,730 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

❤️#扛米 🛵#深圳 😘06/160/92 🐻C, 🥰06 古灵精怪妹妹 带艺术家👩‍🎨 绘画🎨弹琴🎹说爱❤️样样精通 一袋米能扛几楼 💰 10p16pp ✌️ 下午茶3h/3k ✈️联系:@nuomimik ✈️双向:@nuomimik188_bot

12 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC775 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

❤️#幼昱宝 🛵#郑州 #北京 😘168/90🐻B, 🥰08 脱产合法👧 反差萝莉可甜可御 设计专业且兼备艺术生 正规娱乐⭕️人员从业者 全国🉑✈️ 。0整容。馒头白虎 漂亮妹妹 🉑长期🉑包养🉑伴游。 💰🚪188/520 详情见主页频道。夜不过6k天不过7k。 ✈️联系:@yuu75757 ✈️双向:qq:3606655911

9 Aug 2026, 07:22 UTC913 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @lolischool1

Posted without readable text

1

28 Jul 2026, 09:15 UTC≈2,320 views2 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

❤️#爱莉酱 🛵#郑州 #上海 😘06/160/88 🐻B, 🥰06 女大211萝,爱莉酱 豫沪女大高颜萝可✈️0整容天然甜妹,反差小狗,高颜,白幼瘦,s线条身材好,衣品好,皮肤细腻,下面紧,叫声好听,女友感拉满,可线下。 💰188/288🚪,✌️不过8k,天不过1w ✈️联系:@ailijiang1 ✈️双向:@guoguo14728_bot

2

24 Jul 2026, 14:09 UTC≈2,240 views5 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @atatbjx

【验 证 人】:勿扰 【日 期】:7/22 【妹子花名】: 又又酱 @yyj200861681(大号)@yyj200861612 (小号) 【年 龄】:未提供 【身 高】:未提供 【内容总结】:来姨妈跑了,包天7800其他费用总计9+(这里说的9+是总计),中午2点见的面,中间c了2次,晚上7点吃完饭,妹子说有事要出去一下。 他是外地路过空降的, 说朋友找她有事情,我也没多想,就让她去了,中间有点冷,我去找浴袍,我看在浴缸里面放着2件都有血, (我没来之前妹子先洗的澡吹的头发,我也不知道咋处理到浴袍上去了),我当时都在想,可能姨妈来了,我又到床上看了下确实有血 , ,有血就有血了吧,反正c过了,也没多想,到晚上,9点多妹子已经出去2小时了,中间在各大群都有发广告@yyj200861612 这个号, 她出门的时候给我发了个摆摆手的表情,我还没多想,到将近10点了我问他怎么还没回来,

4🔥1

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @szluoli520. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 404,116 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“深广萝莉少萝学院2.0” (@szluoli520), 3,452 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/szluoli520.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.