Channel
@tatyanahealer
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
253subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001765149684 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tatyanahealer |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tatyanahealer |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 06:58 | 253 | -1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 06:36 | 254 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:14 | 255 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 256 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 257 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:47 | 257 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
26 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 46.2% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 23.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 15.4% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 15.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2026 to 20 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzqwMsu8k | 1 | 19 May 2026 | 19 May 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2026 to 20 June 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Есть люди, которые боятся, что их бросят — они должники в отношениях. Они пользуются отношениями, а не отдают. Если человек отдаёт в отношениях — ему нечего бояться. Боится только тот, кто должен. Если человек умеет отдавать, он свободная личность, способная дарить счастье. Он может отдавать своё отношение другому. Человека, который способен любить, невозможно бросить. Торсунов О.Г.
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤3
Video, posted without a caption
Всем доброго дня 🙏Вот мы и переехали в Московскую область 💜Потрясающие , сильное , энергетическое место 😇Мы много и долго жили в Азии(Бали, Таиланд, Вьетнам) и т.д..... И Сейчас переехали сюда 🏝️ И тут хочу собирать теплые встречи 😍 Помощи тем женщинам которые нуждаются в поддержке и опоре 🙏Встречи будут ведические ,темы (семья 👨👩👧 любовь ,работа,деньги ,отношения ,здоровье ,смерть ⚰️ 🙏В нашем теплом кругу будет …
🔥3
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
Тайна вашего достоинства: почему вас бросают и почему вы болеете Мы привыкли думать, что чувство собственного достоинства — это «я себя уважаю» или «меня ценят другие». Но Веды говорят иное. Чувство собственного достоинства — это индикатор того, как мироздание оценивает вашу жизнь. И у этого индикатора есть три положения. Первое — унижение (вниз). Когда женщина терпит мужа-пьяницу, боится его потерять, угождает ему…
❤1
Как красиво , сказано 😍
Каждый грех, который совершает человек, подчиняет его определенной страсти. Свободно подчинившись своим грехам и страстям, он уже является их рабом. Каждая страсть и каждый грех, как утверждают святые отцы, управляется разными бесами. Как у ангелов есть свои чины и таланты, например у одного есть дар молитвы, у другого – бодрствования и бдения и т.д., так и бесовские чины имеют свои страсти и грехи. Когда душа выходи…
🔔ДВИЖЕНИЕ ЖИЗНЬ 🟤1 ЧАСТЬ – Всё приходит в своё время Мы живем для того, чтобы просто выжить. Нам нужна работа, нужна семья, нужны дети, нужны деньги, квартира. Когда человек на это отдаёт все свои силы, он теряет себя, он тает, он становится обесточенным. 🤩 — Обесточенный человек сначала теряет самое дорогое — близких людей. 🤩 — Потом у него теряются силы и на работу. 🤩 — Постепенно он теряет своё положение в общес…
🔥1
🔔ПОМОГЛИ РЕШИТЬ ПРОБЛЕМУ — ВАША ПРОБЛЕМА ТОЖЕ РЕШИТСЯ Камья-карма — вид кармы, очищающий жизнь человека. 1️⃣ — Это означает, что человек должен совершать поступки в своей жизни, которые дальше потом дадут ему возможность зарабатывать на жизнь. Это не является греховной деятельностью. Каждый человек должен выучиться где-то, чтобы потом получать зарплату и работать на благо общества. Это называется Камья-карма. 2️⃣…
🔔ЕСЛИ ПЛОХИЕ СЕМЕЙНЫЕ ОТНОШЕНИЯ 🟤Реальная история, когда мужчина унижает женщину в семье Нельзя позволять внутри себя унижать свою жизнь и свою судьбу. Если вы это позволяете делать — ваша судьба разрушается, вы становитесь некрасивые, вы становитесь несчастные. Всё будет напрасно, если вы теряете себя. 🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷 ⭕️Самое главное правило ⭕️— это сохранять себя. 🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷 Сохранение себя — это вообще самое сложное в отн…
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tatyanahealer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tatyanahealer” (@tatyanahealer), 253 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tatyanahealer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.