Channel
@tatafffs
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
724subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001400541895 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tatafffs |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tatafffs |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 724 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:13 | 721 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:32 | 721 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (26 July 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,062 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
ㅤㅤ ✿| الموت رسالة صامتة ممتلئة بالوعظ تُخبرنا أنّ كل شيء سيفنى، كل ما تملك وكل شيء في هذه الدنيا.. سيفنى ويُصبح هشيم تَذرُوه الرياح، ويبقى ما كان لله! سيبقى العمل الصالح والأثر الحسن وما خلّدته في النفوس من أثر، فاحرص على ما ينفعك واعلم أنّ متاع الدنيا قليل والآخرة خيرٌ لمن اتّقى. 🌿
ربِّ اغفر لي ولوالداي ولكم ولوالديكم 🍃 وللمسلمين والمسلمات والمؤمنين والمؤمنات الأحياء منهم والأموات
ربنا ولا تحملنا ما لا طاقة لنا به وراء هذا الدعاء يقين عظيم؛ أن الله يعلم حدود طاقتك، فلا يضيعك إذا لجأت إليه، ولا يخذلك إذا فوضت أمرك إليه، فثق بلطفه، فإن لطفه لا يغيب، اللهم هون علينا كل صعب، ويسر لنا كل خير ..
كم هم الذين هَمّوا بحفظ القرآن؟ ثم من بين هؤلاء الذين همّوا كم الذين بدؤوا بمشوار الحفظ؟ ثم الذين بدؤوا كم منهم الذين حفظوا؟ ثم الذين حفظوا كم منهم حفظ بإتقان؟ ثم الذين أتقنوا كم الذين بَقِي معهم الإتقان على مرّ الزّمان؟ ثم الذين بقي إتقانهم كم منهم عمل بالقرآن !!!!؟ هنا تعلم أنّ القرآن والعيش به واقعًا لا يناله إلّا من اصطفاه الله... وصدق سبحانه حين قال *ثم أورثنا الكتاب الذين اصطفينا من عبادنا* جعلنا الله من…
ووصينا الإنسان بوالديه إحسانًا حملته أمه كرهاً ووضعته كرهاً لم يذكر الله مشقة الأم عبثًا، بل ليبقى فضلها حاضرًا في القلب، فكل تعبٍ تحملته من أجل ولدها، يستحق برًا لا ينقطع، وإحسانًا لا يفتر. اللهم أعنا على بر والدينا، واجزهم عنا خير الجزاء ..
إن الذين قالوا ربنا الله ثم استقاموا فلا خوف عليهم ولا هم يحزنون ما أعظم جزاء الاستقامة؛ فلا خوف مما هو آت، ولا حزن على ما مضى، لأن من كان الله معه، أبدله طمأنينةً في الدنيا، وبشارةً في الآخرة، اللهم ارزقنا الثبات على دينك، والاستقامة على طاعتك ..
كلّ عثرةٍ واجهتها..💔 جَبَرها الله بدعوةٍ دعوتَها ذات يومٍ ونسيتَها، يُخَبّئ الله لَكَ العطاء حتّى تراه عِنْدَ حاجته، ابقَ داعيًا يا فتى، بل ادعُ الله جدًا إِنَّك إذا نسيتَ قولك، فالله لا يَنسى قَلبك.
" وهمّ يصطرخون فيها ربنا أخرجنا نعمل صالحاً غير الذي كنا نعمل " سبقت هذه الأية .. مُبتدأ الحكاية الموجعة ، يوم تضع الموازين .. وينتهي النصب وينتهي التعب .. يوم يضج المؤمنون في جناتِ عدن " الحمدلله الذي أذهب عنـا الحزن " هناك في لهيب النيران ضجةٌ أُخرى وصرخةٌ لا مُجيب لها .. فقط " أرجعنا نعمل صالحاً " لا يزال في وقتك مُتسـع للعمل الصالح فأسأل الله التوفيق له . بقلم نور🍃
" كثيرة هي الطرق التي سلكناها دون أن نهتم لنصائح السابقين، تعمدنا خوض التجربة كاملة، ووقفنا عند النهاية نتحسر على الأوقات والجهود التي راحت هدرا، وكم قلنا: يا ليت! .💔 . فواحسرتاه إن نظرنا يوما من نافذة البرزخ فوجدنا أن القرآن قد وصف طريق العمر كله ولكننا -مع الأسف- ذُهلنا ولم ننتبه! " .
إن فكرة اللقاء في الجنان من أعظم ما امتنّ الله به على ولد آدم، لو لم يخبرنا ربنا سبحانه عن منابر النور،و لقيا الصحب،و السلام عليهم، ومقابلتهم على السرر،و العوّض عن صرخة الفقد برغد الخلود، و الله ما أظن إلّا أن أكباد الأحباب تتفجر ألمًا من هول فكرة الوداع الذي لا لقاء بعده. 🌧️ اللهم أرحم أمي و أبي و موتى المسلمين
إذا رأيت إنساناً يتخلّف عن صلاته ولا يرتاع لتأخيرها قلبه ومشاعره ، أو بيتاً لاتكون أعظم أولوياته فاغسل يدك من مظاهر البهجة والجمال والتوفيق والبركة في حياتهم جميعاً، وما يصنعون بالحياة وقد فات من قلوبهم إجلال اعظم العبادات على الإطلاق!♥️ والله ثلاثاً ما أعتنى إنسان بصلاته وجعلها أولوية كبرى في حياته إلا شرح الله صدره ويسر له أموره ودفع عنه صوارف السوء وأصلح الله تعالى له كل شيء. وما ضيّعها إنسان إلا ضاع منه كل شيء . …
كنا في غيابة الجُبِّ، لولا أن القـرآن ٱلتقطَنا☁🌿 . فاللهم ذاك
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tatafffs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 345,655 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الحياة مع القرآن 💕💭” (@tatafffs), 724 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tatafffs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.