Channel
@taszeme
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001696103582 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @taszeme |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/taszeme |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:28 | 6 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 6 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 2 October 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
7 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 2 October 2023 to 27 July 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
*ترس بیدار صدر: مدتی میشود که خوابم نمیبرد. آم: شاید ترس داری! صدر: احتمالا میترسم، چون وقتی خیلی خوابم میآید هم باز نمیخواهم بخوابم. آم: ترس داشتنت مهم نیست، سوال این است که از آنچه در خواب خواهی دید میترسی یا آنچه در بیداری دیدهای؟ شاید هم از آنچه در بیداری خواهی دید میترسی...
*باقی مانده خود صدر: فکر میکنی کدومش بدتر باشه؟ اینکه کسی رو دوست نداشته باشی یا اینکه کسی دوستت نداشته باشه؟! آم: فکر به اینکه کسی دوستت نداره! صدر: چطور؟ آم: وقتی فکر کنی کسی دوستت نداره حتی به اونایی که دوستت دارن هم آسیب میزنی. صدر: خودت چطور؟ آم: دیگر خودی باقی نمیماند که بخواد خودی را دوست داشته باشد...
❤2
*خصوصی ساکت شمس: چیکار داشتی؟! آم: یه کار خصوصی داشتم! شمس: کار خصوصی در سکوت و بدون جر و بحث؟ آم: مگر هر کار خصوصی باید همراه با بحث باشه؟ شمس: اگر یک سرش تو باشی، آری... آم: آخر بستگی دارد سر دیگرش چه کسی باشد؟!
❤1
*چرخه خود تحقیر شمس: به نظرت شرایط بدتر از این هم میشد؟ آم: به نظرم دقیقا لحظهای که فکر میکنی بدترین شرایط رو داری، شرایط بدتری نمایان میشه! شمس: آدمی رو دیدی که به اندازه من در شرایط بدی باشه؟ آم: آدمهایی رو دیدم که از شرایط بدتر جون سالم به در بردهاند. شمس: پس دنیا دیدهای. آم: نه ولی فهمیدم که چرخه آدمیزاد اینطور ادامه پیدا میکند که، دقیقا لحظهای که با خودت میگویی دیگر کسی بدتر از من نیست؛ کسی با شرایط بدت…
❤2
@taszeme
*توهم تنهایی صدر: بشدت حس بدی است! اینکه نیاز به حرف زدن داشته باشی و گوشی برای شنیدنش نباشد. آم: انسانها هيچوقت تنها نیستند! آنها خودشان را دارند... صدر: ولی خودمان نمیتوانیم برای خودمان سخنرانی کنیم. آم: فکر میکنی کسی هست که بهتر از خودت، تو را بشناسد؟!
@taszeme
*منبر عاقلان صدر: چطور میشود یک فرد بالا برود و دعا کند دستهای را خدا نابود کند، در صورتی که خودش در همان دسته است؟! غین: شاید اگر عقل داشت وضعیتش این نبود! آم: مهم این نیست که اون فرد چه میگوید! مهم این است که تو چرا نشستهای و گوش میدهی؟ این دسته برای نابودی هم حیف هستند...
@taszeme
*سن سکوت آم: نمیتوانم با همسنهایم کنار بیایم، از بچگی با افرادی دوست میشدم که از خودم بزرگتر بودند! اینطوری راحتتر درک میشدم. صدر: پس چرا الان با کوچکتر از خودت میچرخی؟ آم: برای زنده نگه داشتن کودکی که سالهای سال اجبار به سکوتش کردم...
@taszeme
*فرصت انکار قدر مطلق:تو با فرصت دوباره دادن موافقی؟ آم: به نظرم فرصت دوباره دادن اشتباهه، چیزی که تموم شده، تموم شده. قدر مطلق: ولی تو به اون فرصت دوباره دادی! آم: خب راستش... قدر مطلق: چرا حقیقت رو نمیپذیری؟ اگر دوستش نداشتی بهش فرصت دوباره نمیدادی. آم: شاید چون فراتر از تصورم رفته بود و تو این رو به صورتم کوبیدی...
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @taszeme. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,430,153 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تفکرات سمی یک ذهن مریض” (@taszeme), 6 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/taszeme.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.