Channel
@tasweeer
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,325subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001753830662 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tasweeer |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tasweeer |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:28 | 1,325 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 1,326 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:41 | 1,324 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:33 | 1,323 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:23 | 1,323 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 August 2025 – 16 July 2026) |
| Views total | 345 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم حصل تهكير للقناة القديمة التي كانت بهذا الاسم (المنتقى من الكتب السلفية) وحسبنا الله ونعم الوكيل والآن تم نقل كل الكتب والملفات إلى هذه القناة الجديدة، والحمد لله : https://t.me/OlamaaSonnah
File, posted without a caption
الشيخ صالح الفوزان التصوير محرم وفيه نصوص، فالمسألة ليست اجتهادية
حكم تصوير الحجاج الشيخ الفوزان
حكم التقاط الصور في الحرم وفي أماكن العبادة للشيخ ابن عثيمين
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته جـ - من نسب إلينا أن المحرم من التصوير هو المجسم وأن غير ذلك غير حرام فقد كذب علينا ونحن نرى أنه لا يجوز لبس ما فيه صورة سواء كان من لباس الصغار أو من لباس الكبار وأنه لا يجوز اقتناء الصور للذكرى أو غيرها إلا ما دعت إليه الضرورة أو الحاجة إليه مثل التابعية والرخصة والله الموفق . كتبه محمد الصالح العثيمين في ١١ / ٦ / ١٤١٢ هـ الشيخ ابن عثيمين
#فوائد_أصولية ▪️لا يصح اعتبار زلة العالم خلافا في المسائل الشرعية. قال الشاطبي : «لا يصح اعتمادها -أي زلة العالم- خلافًا في المسائل الشرعية؛ لأنها لم تصدر في الحقيقة عن اجتهاد، ولا هي من مسائل الاجتهاد، وإن حصل من صاحبها اجتهاد؛ فهو لم يصادف فيها محلًا، فصارت في نسبتها إلى الشرع كأقوال غير المجتهد، وإنما يعد في الخلاف الأقوالُ الصادرة عن أدلة معتبرة في الشريعة، كانت مما يقوى أو يضعف، وأما إذا صدرت عن مجرد خفاء ال…
Sticker, posted without a caption
ما حكم التصوير بآلات التصوير والهواتف المتحركة في الحرم؟ الشيخ صالح الفوزان . •••═══ ༻ • • ༺═══••• الجامع في حكم التصوير .
Sticker, posted without a caption
من الانحرافات الشائعة لدى كثير من المميعين والمتساهلين أو الذين يتبعون أهوائهم ويريدون ليّ النصوص لتوافق تساهلهم وتمييعهم: «الاحتجاج بوجود خلاف بين العلماء كذريعة لترك العمل بالنص الواضح». وليس عند الذين يسلكون هذا المسلك مساحة للاحتياط أو ترك المشتبهات . وهذه طريقة أهل الزيغ، وهي ترك الشيء الواضح، واتباع المشتابه، قال الله تعالى: ﴿فَأَمَّا الَّذِينَ فِي قُلُوبِهِمْ زَيْغٌ فَيَتَّبِعُونَ مَا تَشَابَهَ مِنْهُ﴾ [سور…
▪️إنكار الشيخ ربيع المدخلي الشديد على من يتصور ومن ينشر الصور. ـ قال الشيخ العلامة ربيع بن هادي المدخلي في آخر مقال له في الرد على بعض الصحفيين: «وأنصح المسئولين عن جريدة الشرق الأوسط بتقوى الله والالتزام بالإسلام عقيدة ومنهجًا وأخلاقًا، وأن لا تنشر جريدتهم شيئًا من الضلال والباطل، وأن لا تنشر إلا ما يرضاه الله ويدعو إليه الإسلام. وأن تتوب إلى الله من نشر الصور، ولا سيما الصور الخليعة –صور الماجنات والمنحلات- التي…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tasweeer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 335,244 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الجامع في حكم التصوير” (@tasweeer), 1,325 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tasweeer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.