Three UAVs fall on roof of Wildberries logistics facility in Yekaterinburg Emergency responders are working at the scene, while firefighters are extinguishing the blaze Read more... @tass_international

Channel
πππ¬π¬ ππ§πππ«π§πππ’π¨π§ππ₯
@tass_international
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
901subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001654657643 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tass_international |
| Created | 13 April 2022 β measured β cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tass_international |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 901 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:32 | 905 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:22 | 905 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR Β· 30 days
- 1.81%
- avg views Γ· 901 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 16.4
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 5.00%
- reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (6 August 2026 β 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 327 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 06:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Wildberries logistics facility catches fire in Yekaterinburg following attack Eight hundred people were evacuated from the facility in advance Read more... @tass_international
Baltic states pursuing suicidal policy by manufacturing drones for Ukraine β expert Alexander Stepanov commented on the Lithuanian governmentβs decision to begin producing drones for the Ukrainian army Read more... @tass_international
Thai school shooter commits suicide β newspaper According to the report by Khaosod, two people were killed, and updated figures indicate that 15 were injured Read more... @tass_international
Two people killed, over 20 injured in school shooting in Thailand β newspaper According to the report by Khaosod, law enforcement and emergency services are at the scene Read more... @tass_international
UAV with explosives found at Leipzig Airport equipped with 5G antennas β TV Sources in security agencies told ZDF that this indicates drone control via mobile communications Read more... @tass_international
West has no need for strong, independent Ukraine β lawmaker According to Alexander Krierenko, the West wants a territory that could be used to exert constant pressure on Russia Read more... @tass_international
US denies Kiev Patriot system to protect image of military-industrial complex β lawmaker According to Viktor Vodolatsky, "the Patriot system doesnβt work very well" against Russian weapons Read more... @tass_international
Media reports on depletion of US ammunition stocks βdriving Trump crazyβ β newspaper According to sources cited by The Wall Street Journal, media leaks have been troubling the US president for several weeks now Read more... @tass_international
Western attempts to undermine Russia-Kazakhstan relations doomed to failure β diplomat Mikhail Galuzin has characterized Russia's relations with Kazakhstan as a comprehensive strategic partnership and alliance Read more... @tass_international
Kievβs bet on Westβs βwonder weaponsβ against Russia expectedly fails β govenor According to Vladimir Saldo, Russia is growing stronger and finding countermeasures for everything Read more... @tass_international
Total Ukrainian military casualties amount to nearly 2.5 million β Russian commander Apty Alaudinov said that the Kiev regime buries the bodies of Ukrainian servicemen handed over by Russian forces without forensic examination and do not return these bodies to their families and loved ones Read more... @tass_international
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tass_international. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank β 1,250,235 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπππ¬π¬ ππ§πππ«π§πππ’π¨π§ππ₯β (@tass_international), 901 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tass_international.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.