Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Taskin Books

@taskinbooks

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

45subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001605233374
TypeChannel
Username@taskinbooks
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/taskinbooks

Growth

457 August 2026 — 45 subscribers10 August 2026 — 45 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 44–46 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 15:1545no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:0245first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
86.7%
avg views ÷ 45 subscribers
Avg views / post
39.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
10.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026
Posts held20 (28 January 202525 July 2026)
Views total39
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
707
Videos
19
Links
26

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
39s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

112 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥7869.6%
🤩108.93%
87.14%
❤‍🔥87.14%
😭43.57%
🕊21.79%
😢21.79%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 January 2025 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Jul 2026, 07:09 UTC39 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @aij_lifeVideo

🤎Shuning uchun kitob o’qish kerak…! 📚 📚@aij_life📚

🤩4

6 Jul 2026, 10:15 UTC76 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

«Tarix — bu o‘tmishning qog‘ozga muhrlangan soyasi emas, balki kelajakni belgilab beruvchi, tirik qon bilan yozilgan saboqlar majmuasidir». «Qilich — faqat jang maydonidagina g‘olib bo‘lishi mumkin, ammo aql va mushohada insonning yuragini, davlatlarning taqdirini zabt etishga qodir yagona quroldir». «Insonning haqiqiy qiymati u egallagan taxt yoki kiygan shoyi liboslari bilan emas, balki og‘ir damlarda o‘zini va o‘z

❤‍🔥6

25 Jun 2026, 13:22 UTC90 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Nashrga tayyorlanayotgan "Ularga uff dema!" kitobidan.

😭4

16 Apr 2026, 04:48 UTC183 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @aij_life

☘️@aij_life🍃 🩷 ✨AIJ oilasi uchun ajoyib yangilik! 📚 Endi biz sizlar bilan birga kitob mutolaa qilamiz! Birinchi boshlayotgan kitobimiz — “Ishq imtihoni”. Agar siz ham biz bilan birga o‘qishni istasangiz — AIJ oilasiga qo‘shiling! 🤍 📖Rejamiz juda oddiy: — Har juma kunidan keyingi jumagacha 1 ta kitob — Har kuni 30 betdan mutolaa qilamiz — Har kuni men shaxsan tekshirib boraman — Har kuni o‘qilgan qism bo‘yicha savo

🔥41

9 Apr 2026, 18:42 UTC174 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Agar odamlar maʼrifatli boʻlib, narsalar orqali oʻz shaxsiyatini izlashdan voz kechsa, butun reklama sanoati va isteʼmolchilar jamiyati qulab tushardi. Shaxsan sizni xafa qilish niyatim yoʻq, lekin siz yigirmanchi asrning oʻzidayoq oʻz turining 200 milliondan ortiq aʼzosini oʻldirgan insoniyat zotiga mansub emasmisiz? "Hozirning kuchi" kitobidan Manzil: Yunusobod, Shahriston metro, Chinobod ko‘chasi 2-uy Buyurtma

🔥4

26 Mar 2026, 18:21 UTC161 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Odamlar uning ismini hayqirib aytishlarini va atrofida parvona bo'lishlarini xohlaydigan kishi - tirik sanamdir (butdir). U ham tosh va yog'ochdan yo'nilgan sanamlarning qismatiga (ya'ni, parchalanishga) loyiqdir! But sindirmoq Hazrati Ibrohim alayhissalomdan merosdir. Faqat moddiy butlarni emas, qalbdagi butlarni (kibr, shuhratparastlik, riyo) sindirmoq asl maqomdir! Bu o‘lkada namozdan qochib yogaga, ro‘zadan qo

❤‍🔥2🔥2😢2

12 Jan 2026, 17:02 UTC235 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Malik Badri va islomiy tafakkur konsepsiyasi “Tafakkur — unutilgan islomiy farz” Zamonaviy psixologiya tafakkurni asosan kognitiv jarayon — muammolarni hal qilish, qaror qabul qilish va axborotni qayta ishlash bilan izohlaydi. Bunday yondashuv tafakkurni biologik va mexanistik doirada talqin etib, uning ruhiy-axloqiy qatlamlarini e’tibordan chetda qoldiradi. Sudonlik psixolog va mutafakkir Malik Badri ushbu asarida

🔥8

12 Jan 2026, 17:02 UTC173 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Tafakkur muammosi va islomiy psixologiyaning metodologik tiklanishi (Malik Badri: “Tafakkur — unutilgan islomiy farz” asari haqida tahliliy taqriz) XX asr psixologiyasi tafakkurni asosan kognitiv operatsiyalar majmui sifatida talqin qildi. Inson fikrlashi neyrofiziologik mexanizmlar, axborotni qayta ishlash modellari va xulq-atvor natijalari bilan izohlandi. Natijada tafakkur o‘zining ontologik va axloqiy o‘lchamid

🔥6

12 Jan 2026, 16:55 UTC140 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🧠📘 Tafakkur — unutilgan farz haqida Bugungi inson ko‘p o‘ylaydi, lekin kam tafakkur qiladi. Ko‘p ma’lumotga ega, ammo kam ma’no topadi. Malik Badri aynan shu muammoga e’tibor qaratadi. “Tafakkur — unutilgan islomiy farz” — bu shunchaki psixologik kitob emas. Bu asar inson aqli, qalbi va imoni o‘rtasidagi uzilib qolgan rishtani qayta tiklashga urinishdir. Muallif kitobni Qur’onning ilk nozil bo‘lgan oyatlari — “Iqr

🔥6

10 Jan 2026, 19:07 UTC142 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

📘 Ularga qo‘rquv yo‘q — qo‘rquvdan najot tomon... Inson hayoti qo‘rquv bilan boshlanib, qo‘rquv bilan davom etayotgandek tuyuladi: kelajakdan xavotir, yo‘qotishdan qo‘rquv, yolg‘izlik, o‘lim… Ammo Qur’on va Sunnat bizni bunday holatga mahkum etmaydi. Aksincha, ilohiy xitobda shunday deya xabar beriladi: “Ularga qo‘rquv yo‘q va ular mahzun ham bo‘lmaslar.” Xo‘sh, Soyasiz kunda qanday insonlar, qanday qalblar qo‘rquv

🔥6

10 Jan 2026, 19:06 UTC128 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Ularga qo‘rquv yo‘q — Bir qalbda ikki qo‘rquv jamlanmas! Zamon tez, xavotir ko‘p. Inson esa tobora o‘z ichida yashayotgan qo‘rquvlar bilan yolg‘iz qolib bormoqda. Qo‘rquv — ba’zan tanani emas, qalbni falaj qiladi. Ana shunday bir paytda savol tug‘iladi: imonli qalb ham qo‘rquv bilan yashaydimi? 📘 Ularga qo‘rquv yo‘q kitobi shu savolga mulohaza bilan javob beradi. Asar Qur’on va Sunnat asosida qo‘rquv tushunchasini

🔥6

10 Jan 2026, 18:48 UTC121 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

«Alloh bir bandada ikki qo‘rquvni jamlamaydi va ikki omonlikni ham jamlamaydi. Kim bu dunyoda Mendan qo‘rqsa, Qiyomatda uni omon qilaman. Kim bu dunyoda Mendan omonda bo‘lsa (ya’ni qo‘rqmasa), Qiyomatda uni qo‘rqitaman». (Imom Termiziy, Imom Bayhaqiy, Imom Ibni Hibbon rivoyatlari...) “Ularga qo‘rquv yo‘q” — qalbni xotirjamlikka chorlovchi kitob Inson qalbini eng ko‘p ezadigan tuyg‘u — qo‘rquvdir. Ertangi kun, rizq,

🔥6

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @taskinbooks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Taskin Books” (@taskinbooks), 45 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/taskinbooks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.