5 measurements spanning 23 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean βno change observedβ, never βinterpolatedβ. The vertical axis spans 305β313 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 22:16
312
+3
23 Aug 2026, 12:19
309
+3
15 Aug 2026, 05:28
306
-6
8 Aug 2026, 07:35
312
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:06
312
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 16 February 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
215 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
π₯
142
66.0%
β‘
20
9.30%
β€
16
7.44%
π€£
9
4.19%
π
8
3.72%
β€βπ₯
5
2.33%
π
5
2.33%
πΏ
4
1.86%
π€
3
1.40%
π€
2
0.93%
π
1
0.465%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 215reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 February 2026 to 8 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
π HOPE DISPATCH TEAM GROSS EXAMPLE
π JUN 29 - JUL 05
βοΈ Loads less than 24K lbs
π° Total Gross: $13,000.00
π£ Total Mileage: 3,379
π Average RPM: $3.85
π‘ Sometimes strategic deadhead is worth it. Despite 1,058 unpaid miles, the truck still finished the week with stunning $13,000 for total 3,379 miles
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
What's up, everyone! π
Check out Adam's results from last week:
β 6 working days
β $10,600 gross
β $4.29 RPM
Absolutely insane performance! ππ₯
Fun fact: Adam recently transitioned from the Update team to Dispatch, and he's already crushing it!
GM everyone! βοΈ
I recently started sharing content on my Instagram and documenting my journey in the trucking industry. π
I'll be posting trucking insights, real experiences, dispatching tips, lessons I've learned along the way, and some behind-the-scenes content from day-to-day operations. ππ‘
If that sounds interesting, give me a follow and stay tuned for more. π
Looking forward to connecting with you all and grβ¦
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tash_dispatch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollβs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only β there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionβs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionβs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 February 2026 to 8 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank β 93,288 of 1,628,927entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 β this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βTashDispatch Team π₯β (@tash_dispatch), 312 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tash_dispatch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.