Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ་ ֺ 𝑫𝒓𝒂𝒈𝒐𝒏 𝑻𝒂𝒓𝒐𝒕 |فال تاروت་◝

Channel

་ ֺ 𝑫𝒓𝒂𝒈𝒐𝒏 𝑻𝒂𝒓𝒐𝒕 |فال تاروت་◝

@tarotgreen

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,045subscribers

-32 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002140899970
TypeChannel
Username@tarotgreen
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tarotgreen

Growth

1,0451,0771,0617 August 2026 — 1,077 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,077 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,075 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,070 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,064 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,059 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,058 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,052 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,045 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 23 days, net -32. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,040–1,082 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 09:141,045-7
26 Aug 2026, 22:561,052-6
24 Aug 2026, 04:031,058-1
20 Aug 2026, 02:561,059-5
17 Aug 2026, 12:571,064-6
14 Aug 2026, 03:381,070-5
11 Aug 2026, 00:031,075-2
8 Aug 2026, 00:161,077no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:351,077first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.56%
avg views ÷ 1,045 subscribers
Avg views / post
89.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held17 (19 July 20263 August 2026)
Views total179
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

92 reactions across 7 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥3841.3%
👍1718.5%
💘99.78%
🐳88.70%
😍88.70%
🍓44.35%
🌚22.17%
🎄22.17%
🕊22.17%
💯11.09%
🫡11.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 92reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC88 viewsread 8 August 2026

فال و پیویارو تا جایی ک بنونم میفرستم و پاسخ میدم عسلیا امشب🤭✨💋 قلب سبز بذارین چک بشه

3 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC91 viewsread 8 August 2026

بچهای ک شمع تراپی ثبت کردن تو گروه شمغ تراپی نیستن پیام بدین بیارمتون حتما ک از ریچوال جا نمونین

30 Jul 2026, 19:29 UTC184 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

واکنشم وقتی هر روز میزنین احساسی و بازهم هر روز فال احساسی داریم:😂😭🗣

😍5🌚2🐳1💘1🫡1

30 Jul 2026, 09:41 UTC195 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

فال چی میخواین؟

  1. تک نیت31%
  2. اتفاقات ماه34%
  3. احساسی54%
  4. مالی کاری12%
  5. درون روح14%

The shares total 145%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

30 Jul 2026, 09:39 UTC180 viewsread 8 August 2026

تا ۷ میرم خرید امشب مراسم شمع تراپی داریم ایه الناس نگید جا موندییممم🗣🤭😂 سفارش دارید ثبت بکنین قبلا ثبت زدین حتما پیام بدید دریافت فیش و پیگیری سفارش امشب انجام شه!

29 Jul 2026, 18:53 UTC173 viewsread 8 August 2026

بچهایی ک تراپی دارن پیوی حاضری بزنن مجدد جا نمونن🥹

25 Jul 2026, 13:21 UTC262 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

╰───────╮ ✧ ✨ کارت سوم: جادوگر (The Magician) بله یا خیر: بله! صد در صد بله! کائنات همه چیز رو برات فراهم کرده. وضعیت احساسی: برگشت: تو کارتِ برنده رو دستت داری. اگه استراتژی درستی داشته باشی، ورق کاملاً به نفعِ تو برمی‌گرده. کراش: جادوگر یعنی مهارتِ جذب. تو می‌تونی اون آدم رو به سمت خودت بکشونی، فقط کافیه بخوای! سینگل‌ها: وقتِ باز کردنِ طلسمِ تنهایی. خودت رو ارتقا بده؛ یه آشناییِ خیلی سرنوشت‌ساز و هوشمندانه در راهه

🐳4❤‍🔥1💘1

25 Jul 2026, 13:17 UTC201 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

╰───────╮ ✧ 🔥 کارت دوم: شاهِ چوب (King of Wands) بله یا خیر: بله، ولی به شرطی که با اراده و جدیت بری جلو! وضعیت احساسی: برگشت: باید مقتدر باشی؛ نذار ضعف نشون بدی، طرفت دنبالِ یه آدمِ قوی و با اعتمادبه‌نفس می‌گرده. کراش: جذبه‌ی تو الان در اوجِ، اون آدم داره بهت توجه می‌کنه، فقط کافیه خودت باشی. سینگل‌ها: یه آدمِ خاص، کاریزماتیک و پرشور واردِ زندگیت میشه که حرف‌های زیادی برای گفتن داره. وضعیت مالی: وقتِ فرمانرواییه!

❤‍🔥5🎄1💘1

25 Jul 2026, 13:13 UTC180 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

╰───────╮ ✧ 💧 کارت اول: آسِ جام (Ace of Cups) بله یا خیر: یه «بله» قاطع، با طعمِ عشق و خوشبختی! وضعیت احساسی: برگشت: قلبت رو برای یه شروع تازه آماده کن، یه صلحِ شیرین در راهه. کراش: طرف مقابلت هم بی‌میل نیست، یه پیام یا حرکتِ احساسی ازش می‌بینی. سینگل‌ها: یه پیشنهادِ عاشقانه که ریشه در صداقت داره، قراره دنیات رو رنگی کنه. وضعیت مالی: از راهِ خلاقیت یا همکاری‌های دلی، یه پولِ خوب یا فرصتِ کاریِ عالی برات می‌رسه. پیام

❤‍🔥5💘1💯1

25 Jul 2026, 13:10 UTC162 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🐉 سلام جوجه اژدهایانِ مادام دراگون! امروز رفتم تو عمقِ جنگل و از کائنات خواستم براتون حرف بزنه. سه تا کارت جلوی منه؛ هر کدومش یه انرژیِ خاص داره. چشمات رو ببند، یه نفسِ عمیق بکش و یکی از این کارت‌ها رو انتخاب کن. انتخاب کردی؟ حالا برو سراغ تفسیر کارت خودت

💘1

25 Jul 2026, 07:07 UTC186 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

خببب بریم بله خیر با توضیح احساسی مالی و پیام روز امروزو ا دل جنگل بگیم. نیت کن ریعکشن بزن کارتتو انتخاب کن✨🧘🏻‍♀️🫡

❤‍🔥18🕊2🍓1🎄1🐳1💘1

25 Jul 2026, 06:35 UTC196 viewsread 8 August 2026

بچهایی ک ثبت فال کردن قلب سبز بذارن تاریخ ارسال سفارش بهشون داده بشه🥹💕💋

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @tarotgreen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Jul 2026, 09:41 UTCAnonymous Poll59 voters

فال چی میخواین؟

  1. تک نیت31%
  2. اتفاقات ماه34%
  3. احساسی54%
  4. مالی کاری12%
  5. درون روح14%

The shares total 145%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 121,290 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“་ ֺ 𝑫𝒓𝒂𝒈𝒐𝒏 𝑻𝒂𝒓𝒐𝒕 |فال تاروت་◝” (@tarotgreen), 1,045 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tarotgreen.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.