Channel
@tarihibyz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
72subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003027668741 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tarihibyz |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 27 August 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tarihibyz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 72 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 70 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 70 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (27 August 2025 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 737 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 23:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
59 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 38 | 64.4% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 16.9% | |
| 💯 | 10 | 16.9% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 1.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 August 2025 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
"Отличный народ - татары; все они честны, верны слову, опрятны, смелы, прекрасные, прирожденные всадники и первоклассные воины. А до чего проста магометанская вера. Как она удобна, практична, необременительна и как возвышает человека. Эх, дал маху великий князь Владимир Красное Солнышко, когда из всех религий не остановился на магометанской!Сделай он так - и мы бы теперь... Впрочем, бросим это. Нет на свете худших …
Из истории татар Всякому приезжему, без сомнения, покажется странным, что казанские татары – народ более образованный, нежели некоторые (даже европейские). При каждой мечети имеется училище, в котором обучаются дети. Кроме чтения и основ ислама здесь изучают арабский язык. Его изучают в той степени, которая нужна для поверхностного понимания Корана. Также изучается персидский и бухарский языки. Стоит заметить, что з…
👍2
Тарихыбыз pinned «Ассаляму аляйкум уа рахматуллахи уа баракатуху, дорогие братья и сёстры! По совету уважаемых братьев я решил создать канал, посвящённый истории. Ведь история наших народов — это неразрывная часть борьбы на пути Аллаха Всевышнего, распространения знаний и…»
#История_татар Они также не знали, что мусульманские историки сопровождали упоминание татар осуждением вовсе не из-за их происхождения, а по причине тех бесчисленных бедствий, разрушений, кровопролитий и смут, которые они принесли мусульманским землям и которые привели к падению власти Аббасидского халифата. Не понимали они и того, что всё это совершила лишь одна часть татар, действовавшая в землях Ирака. Что же ка…
❤2
Ризаэтдин-хазрат Фахретдин
❤7
Наш досточтимый Ризаэтдин-хазрат Фахретдин ещё в далёком 1929 году с глубокой болью переживал за судьбу нашего народа, видя разруху нравов и утрату веры среди молодёжи… «Ровно тридцать лет назад я начал свой труд “Асар”. В тот же час, но уже 9 июня 1929 года, я вновь взялся за это сочинение. Однако моё душевное состояние тогда и теперь столь различны, что разница между ними больше, чем между Востоком и Западом. В п…
❤4👍1💔1
Дорогие мусульмане, если будут вопросы относительно нашей истории, то можно подготовиться и провести эфир, ин шаа Аллах
«Наша сегодняшняя проблема в том, что вроде бы хочется что-то сделать, поднять наши народы с колен, но потом приходит страх, отсутствие поддержки — и всё остаётся лишь на словах и в воспоминаниях о былом величии наших предков.» Арслан-хазрат Болгарлы
Стремление башкортов к независимости в течение веков. «Русский энциклопедический словарь», издаваемый профессором Санкт-Петербургского университета И.Н. Березиным, 1873 год. «…Пользуясь неустройством России, башкиры, вместо спокойной жизни, обратились к прежним национальным привычкам–грабежу, и уже в 1676 г., вместе с киргизами, под предводительством Сеида, разорили закамские пригороды, даже частию Казанский уезд,…
👍5❤1
Прошу извинить за отсутствие все эти дни, так как был занят
На сегодняшний день русские оккупанты, а также историки и муллы, продавшие свою религию и народ, пытаются внушить, что после падения Казанского ханства православные и мусульмане жили бок о бок в дружбе и согласии. Но любой человек, изучающий свою историю, знает, что всё это — ложь и клевета на наших славных предков, которые, не щадя себя, своего имущества и своих семей, боролись против оккупационных сил вплоть до кон…
💯10
Покорение Казани было предпринято не столько из политических целей, сколько из мотивов чисто религиозных. Ясным доказательством этого служат слова Иоанна Грозного, сказанные перед походом и после него: «не могу терпеть погибели христиан, вверенных мне Христом моим; хочу страдати за веру православную и святые церкви не токмо до крове, но и до последнего издыхания, до смерти, и Христос, видя несомненную веру мою, освоб…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tarihibyz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Нужен ли цикл лекций по истории нашего народа?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 August 2025 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 237,937 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Тарихыбыз” (@tarihibyz), 72 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tarihibyz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.