3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 165–166 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 12:36
165
-1
8 Aug 2026, 16:00
166
no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:39
166
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
67.8%
avg views ÷ 165 subscribers
Avg views / post
112
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
14 (15 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
1,118
Reactions total
76
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
138 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
69
50.0%
🔥
26
18.8%
custom 5357579953497983889
12
8.70%
👏
12
8.70%
👍
10
7.25%
custom 5357584845465730934
5
3.62%
😍
4
2.90%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 138reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Добрый день!
Хочу поделиться показательной ситуацией, к сожалению, нередко встречающейся на приеме: Пациентка, 49 лет. Основной диагноз: Полип тела матки уже длительное время.
Обсудили основную проблему, даю рекомендации по тактике лечения полипа, подробно рассказываю о причинах и необходимости удаления и рисках. На что меня пациентка прерывает словами:
«Спасибо, я уже прорабатываю этот вопрос с психологом. Я прод…
Эрозия шейки матки: что это такое и нужно ли ее прижигать? 🔥
«У вас эрозия, надо ее обязательно прижечь!» — эту фразу женщины слышат и в государственных, и в частных клиниках. Предполагается, что таким образом можно восстановить нормальное состояние шейки матки и предотвратить осложнения.
Про пользу прижигания пишут и на сайтах многих клиник. Но точно ли это нужно и что вообще за эрозия шейки матки? Давайте разбира…
Если после близости больно ходить в туалет...
Все было хорошо, но через несколько часов или на следующий день после полового акта появляются жжение, рези при мочеиспускании, частые позывы в туалет и ощущение, что мочевой пузырь так и не опустел.
Часто причина таких симптомов — посткоитальный цистит, то есть воспаление мочевого пузыря, которое развивается после полового контакта.
Почему это происходит?
Во время бл…
Цистит постоянно возвращается...
Пожалуй, это одна из самых частых (и надоедливых) проблем, с которой сталкиваются девушки и женщины. Если вы знакомы с циститом, то помните эти ощущения: рези, жжение, частые позывы в туалет, дискомфорт, который буквально не дает заниматься привычными делами…
Боль настолько сильная, что хочется лезть на стенку, лишь бы отпустило.
Многие начинают лечиться самостоятельно: принимают а…
Иногда лучший способ позаботиться о нервной системе — вечер с хорошим сериалом.
В своей работе я часто говорю с пациентками о здоровье, профилактике, обследованиях и лечении. Но здоровье — это еще и то, насколько хорошо мы умеем восстанавливаться после напряженных дней.
Хороший сериал после насыщенного дня для меня — это маленький ритуал перезагрузки. Особенно после работы, где каждый день связан с ответственностью…
Интересно стало после предыдущего поста:
А что с динамикой на препаратах для похудения и после их отмены? Есть ли какие-то изменения, и всегда ли они положительные?
Недавно было опубликовано крупное исследование (журнал BMJ), в котором ученые решили ответить на эти же вопросы. Оказалось, что в реальной жизни около половины пациентов прекращают лечение уже в течение первого года. Причины? Вероятно, замечают эффект и …
«Я начала колоть препарат Х, а месячные почему-то пропали...»
Как прекрасна идея о том, чтобы похудеть быстро и без особых усилий.
Мы уже разговаривали с вами о том, что потребность в похудении часто захватывает женщин абсолютно разных возрастов, при этом, часто потребность эта не подкреплена показаниями. А еще чаще она бывает вызвана желанием вписываться в стандарты красоты, заданные социальными сетями.
Вы 100% сл…
❤7👏5🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @tararashkinadoc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
У молодой женщины часто возникают симптомы цистита через 24–48 часов после полового акта. Какое объяснение ее состояния наиболее вероятно?
Аллергическая реакция на латекс0%
Интерстициальный цистит, не связанный с инфекцией0%
Острый пиелонефрит из-за восходящей инфекции почек0%
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,024,357 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мой гинеколог | Татьяна Тарарашкина” (@tararashkinadoc), 165 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tararashkinadoc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
