Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Taran.Space: Announcements

Channel

Taran.Space: Announcements

@taran_space

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

62subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002401836232
TypeChannel
Username@taran_space
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 October 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged4 times, most recently 9 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/taran_space

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

616261.57 August 2026 — 61 subscribers10 August 2026 — 61 subscribers8 September 2026 — 62 subscribers7 August 20268 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 32 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 61–62 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 09:4062+1
10 Aug 2026, 04:4661no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:4161first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

34 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1647.1%
❤514.7%
👍514.7%
💯514.7%
👀38.82%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 October 2025 to 6 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Feb 2026, 06:18 UTC157 viewsread 10 August 2026

Just deployed: audit reports portal — all public reports in one place, easy to browse and share. Useful as reference material for security research and protocol due diligence. Currently includes two reports (both on ZKsync OS). The portal will be updated as new reports are finalized. [ X | LinkedIn ]

3 Feb 2026, 15:31 UTC135 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Beware of scam recruiters, never run npm install on untrusted repos [ LinkedIn | X/Twitter ]

💯5

18 Jan 2026, 20:04 UTC170 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

We’ve updated our intro and pricing model for 2026. Since we value transparency, we keep our rates and engagement models public: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LJnspWQl5zCzJuM4cPbrzIttWBAiZDtvJ0z5zSdRKIw/edit The competition model is now an official engagement format. For competition-based audits we include a dedicated prize pool: • 1-week audit → $3K prize pool • each additional week adds +$1K • up to $6K pr…

🔥6

9 Jan 2026, 05:41 UTC160 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

How do we run our pilot competitions: Read in [ X/Twitter ] or [ LinkedIn ] If you have thoughts on it — please reply, comment or quote. Every opinion matters. Don't hesitate to ask questions too.

❤3

8 Jan 2026, 17:42 UTC154 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Quick observation about CRITICAL issues based on our pilot security competitions: Read in [ X/Twitter ] or [ LinkedIn ] If you have thoughts or disagree — please reply, comment or quote. Every opinion matters. Don't hesitate to ask questions too.

👀3

6 Jan 2026, 13:39 UTC318 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Audit complete: our second report for ZKsync OS is now live! 🚀 Following earlier protocol-level reviews, this audit focused on elliptic curve cryptography used in ZKsync OS — a highly optimized, performance-oriented codebase written in Rust. During the review we identified several high-impact issues, all of which were promptly resolved by the Matter Labs team. 📁 Full public report on GitHub 🚀 ZKsync announcement …

🔥6

2 Dec 2025, 13:12 UTC144 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Meanwhile, we're launching ultimate END-OF-YEAR promo: 20% OFF any audit booked in December 2025 https://x.com/taran_space/status/1995839221744218186 https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:share:7401606453180006401/?actorCompanyId=12633028 Please repost. If it goes well, next year we'll host competitions on DoraHacks and prize pools will be much higher 📈

❤2🔥1

2 Dec 2025, 06:42 UTC124 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🏁 We've almost completed validation of submissions 🏁 Preliminary results: - pushkarm029: 1 Medium, 2 Low, 1 Invalid - meteoir: 1 CRITICAL, 1 QA, 8 issues need additional data for proper validation, 2 issues are pending on our side - Amit22-yadav: 4 Duplicates, 2 Invalid, 10 issues need additional data for proper validation

🔥3

11 Nov 2025, 18:44 UTC166 viewsread 10 August 2026

We have only 2 people submitted. That means that, technically, even after closing the submission window, first person discovering non-duplicate Low-severity finding gets the 🥉 prize. If no such submission occurs, we'll have either conduct new round, or increase values of 🥈and 🥇prizes

11 Nov 2025, 15:04 UTC154 viewsread 10 August 2026

🏁 Submission window is closed 🏁 Thank you so much for participation! We're starting with validation. Please, be patient. It can take some time, up to few weeks but every submission will receive a feedback. Also, stay tuned since we might request additional data. Your findings could be even validated as higher severity than you claimed initially, if new data proves it. If you couldn't submit before, feel free to do…

11 Nov 2025, 12:01 UTC132 viewsread 10 August 2026

🏁 Submission window is open 🏁 Feel free to reveal your comments any time, but not later than 4pm CET. The repository visibility has been changed to private. All pending invitations have been cancelled. We'll make the repo public again after the dev team of zkSync will resolve critical issues and acknowledge the rest.

11 Nov 2025, 10:57 UTC118 viewsread 10 August 2026

🏃‍♂️It's just 1 hour left till the submission window opens (tomorrow 1pm CET). You'll have only 3 hours to submit comments. Make sure that the comments are left on specific lines, not to the PR itself. Double-check the protocol and it's "Reporting issues" section.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @taran_space. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Nov 2025, 07:25 UTCAnonymous Poll7 voters

Do you want to extend the competition?

  1. Yes, please71%
  2. No, I'm good29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 October 2025 to 6 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Taran.Space: Announcements” (@taran_space), 62 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/taran_space.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.