Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

桃桃的后花园

@tao531

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

484subscribers

-5,388 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003916832064
TypeChannel
Username@tao531
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 8 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tao531

Growth

4846,0463,2656 August 2026 — 5,872 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,872 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,046 subscribers11 August 2026 — 484 subscribers6 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -5,388. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 01:41484-5,562
7 Aug 2026, 17:436,046+174
6 Aug 2026, 20:455,872no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:345,872first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
190.8%
avg views ÷ 484 subscribers
Avg views / post
923
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held26 (8 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total14,774
Reactions total10
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

12 reactions across 9 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC189 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @quishangcheng

杭州秋雅总群:https://telegram.me/nanjinggeren66 🌳【客名】: 📆【日期】: 8月8日 🧘‍♀【老师】: #桃大人 📮【联系】:@nana19 🏡【位置】:上城区 💰【课费】:700p 🌏【罩杯】:D+ 🧖‍♀【服务】:都有 📋【详情】:今天礼拜天 想着约个老师出击,在报告频道看到了桃桃老师感觉还可以,于是就下定预约。按照桃桃的指令一步步到达课室。一进门,就非常热情,帮忙换鞋子。共浴,在洗浴的时候还会给口,口的很舒服。洗完后,进入课室,继续调情服务,老师还是很水润的,之后就是女上,出击的很舒服。温柔 也会找话题给你一直聊天,情绪价值满满。 【机车行为】: 无 【优点缺点】:会二刷 很好 【推荐程度】:⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

9 Aug 2026, 11:56 UTC120 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @hznmzjycjg

【时间】:2026-08-09 【老师】:桃大人 【留名】:炉 时 【费用】:工兵o 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:8 【颜值】:8 【身材】:9 【服务】:9 【态度】:9 【环境】:9 【综合】:8.67 【过程】:小头控制大头,让我换了老师优惠券,看了下前人报告,还是可以的,遂联系老师约好时间准备出击。老师工作室在东站附近环境还不错,隔壁没人可以放心搞。进门看到老师少妇类型,胸大。因为精虫上脑遂交水费开始,洗澡然后开始服务,口活不错,胸也确实大,软绵绵。老师本人也是骚话不断情绪价值还是很足的。身材也不好胖,比较匀称。妹妹包裹感很足,算是一次不错的体验

7 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC410 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

💐💐💐开奖了💐💐💐 桃大人 ~ 夏日福利来袭 开奖了! 本期总参与人数: 5285 1- 月蚀 获得:桃大人半价p 2- 橙麓妄年 获得:通用200优惠券 3- 黄金剩男 获得:通用200优惠券 4- 你是我的噩梦情人 获得:口令红包 18.88 5- 心蠱 获得:口令红包 18.88 谨祝中奖用户大吉大利万事顺意

7 Aug 2026, 08:46 UTC622 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

💐💐💐开奖了💐💐💐 桃桃 @nana19 半价福利抽奖 开奖了! 本期总参与人数: 5464 1- 狂欢之夜 获得:半价 400P 2- 见识 获得:优惠价500p 3- 妖妖妖妖妖孽 获得:优惠价500p 谨祝中奖用户大吉大利万事顺意

4 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC≈1,120 viewsread 10 August 2026

@xiaoqi626508 我的发小好闺闺 可以双飞 有互动 激情四起哦 宝宝们 @

4 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC≈1,190 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🎰 桃大人 ~ 夏日福利来袭 📮 抽奖条件: 🎫 加入-杭州一哥传媒 🎫 加入-杭州一哥课堂(蕾蕾 后援会) 🎫 加入-杭州一哥视频认证榜单 🎫 加入-杭州一哥严选认证榜单 🎫 加入-桃桃的后花园 🎁 奖品内容: 桃大人半价p × 1 通用200优惠券 × 2 口令红包 18.88 × 2 💡 活动说明: 桃大人 @nana19 巨乳御姐 | 炮架体质 | 高性价比 📅 开奖日期:(UTC+8) 2026年08月07日 23时59分58秒

3

4 Aug 2026, 08:58 UTC≈1,130 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🎰 桃桃 @nana19 半价福利抽奖 📮 抽奖条件: 🎫 加入-杭州Alex的大奶新人榜单 🎫 加入-杭州Alex教你123 🎫 加入-杭州Alex的小视频 🎫 加入-杭州Alex的大奶认证榜单 🎫 加入-桃桃的后花园 🎁 奖品内容: 半价 400P × 1 优惠价500p × 2 💡 活动说明: 5天内兑奖,炸号超时名额作废 📅 开奖日期:(UTC+8) 2026年08月07日 16时46分45秒

2 Aug 2026, 03:43 UTC≈1,180 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @quishangcheng

杭州秋雅总群:https://telegram.me/nanjinggeren66 🌳【客名】:大风歌 📆【日期】: 8月1日 🧘‍♀【老师】: #桃大人 📮【联系】:@nana19 🏡【位置】:上城区 💰【课费】:700p 🌏【罩杯】:D+ 🧖‍♀【服务】:都有 📋【详情】:与桃桃老师联系后,我按时间到达地点。课室很安全,老师警惕性也很高。见面人照一致,超乎想象的惊喜,娃娃脸搭配D胸,和瘦腰,居然还有清晰的锁骨,看起来像清纯的可爱,说一声尤物未尝不可。态度方面也很nice,没有让人感到不适,情绪价值很到位,过程让人放松,桃桃服务很好,改有的服务你不用说都做的很到位,穴夹嘎,水多润滑到位。整个过程很享受整体基本没发现什么缺点。 【机车行为】: 无 【优点缺点】:会二刷 很好 【推荐程度】:⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @tao531. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 775,023 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“桃桃的后花园” (@tao531), 484 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tao531.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.