Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Психолог Волкова

Channel

Психолог Волкова

@tanya_of_psy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

88subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002061145102
TypeChannel
Username@tanya_of_psy
DescriptionТатьяна Волкова Психоаналитический психолог Обо мне https://t.me/tanya_of_psy/158 Онлайн, Очно Запись на консультацию @tanyaofpsy YouTube канал https://youtube.com/@tanyaofpsy Соцсеть с картинками https://www.instagram.com/tanyaofpsy
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/tanya_of_psy

Growth

887 August 2026 — 88 subscribers9 August 2026 — 88 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 87–89 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 15:4588no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:2088first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 31 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
31
Videos
17
Links
27

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
15m 03s
Average length
3m 01s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

122 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5545.1%
4536.9%
👏97.38%
🎄43.28%
😁32.46%
custom 521330550803478338421.64%
👍21.64%
10.82%
💯10.82%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 21 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tanya_of_psy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 December 2025 to 21 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Apr 2026, 08:40 UTC164 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Неверное утверждение, что «влюбленный мужчина будет ждать столько, сколько потребуется». Точнее, может и будет, и в этом нет ничего плохо, но вы тогда не удивляйтесь потом, когда у вас начнутся проблемы с сексом. Или он окажется для вас потом «недостаточно мужественным» Разверну. Я сейчас говорю штампами, как принято в этих ваших интернетах. Что такое «недостаточность мужественности» в общепринятом смысле, на всех я

🔥4custom 521330550803478338421

6 Apr 2026, 06:20 UTC134 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

🐆🐆 Обсуждаем, почему люди опаздывают

🔥7😁1

18 Mar 2026, 13:11 UTC180 views0 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @tass_agency

Женщины не будут обязаны идти к психологу при нежелании иметь детей. Решение останется за ними, государство лишь предоставляет им такую возможность, сообщил ТАСС депутат ГД Леонов.

18 Mar 2026, 10:22 UTC155 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @tass_agency

Женщин, не планирующих ребенка, могут направить к психологу с целью формирования положительных установок на рождение детей. Об этом говорится в документе, утвержденном Минздравом, с которым ознакомился ТАСС. Это возможно, если женщина при анкетировании в рамках репродуктивной диспансеризации ответит, что не хочет иметь детей. ✔ Подпишись на ТАСС в Max

16 Mar 2026, 06:03 UTC122 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Внезапно, меня занесло на йогу. Внезапно, это оказалось не занятие по йоге, а лекция по восточной философии (в понимании лектора) и аюрведе. Так я оказалась там, где я старалась не бывать и от знаний чего я ограждала свою психику и не зря. В общем, постараюсь вкратце описать, откуда столько подозрительности в сторону духовности, к философии занимающихся йогой. Многие люди, кто в этой теме глубоко (а именно, в теме

🔥8👍1😁1

27 Feb 2026, 07:43 UTC155 views8 reactions3 Starsread 9 August 2026

О психоанализе Мое Особо категоричное мнение

4🔥4

14 Feb 2026, 10:48 UTC214 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Независимо от даты в календаре, помните, что ваша ценность не определяется наличием или отсутствием отношений, наличием букетов или их отсутствием. Для желания друг друга и повода устроить романтик, необязательно следовать дате. Но пока мы живем в обществе и являемся частью его, нормально думать по-другому и предавать особое значение дню всех влюбленных. Кому-то все равно, но для кого-то это день, когда одиночество

7🔥31💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @tanya_of_psy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Психолог Волкова” (@tanya_of_psy), 88 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tanya_of_psy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.