Channel
@tanya_gdemoystyle
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
505subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002277052302 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tanya_gdemoystyle |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tanya_gdemoystyle |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 19:20 | 505 | -1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 17:36 | 506 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:07 | 509 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:42 | 510 | -3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:12 | 513 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 516 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:52 | 516 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:52 | 517 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 3 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
28 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 23 | 82.1% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 17.9% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 8 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Друзья, проект с нетворкингами в Зеленограде полетел 🚀 Каждый день я знакомлюсь с новыми людьми и открываю для себя и моего нового детища новые возможности. С одной стороны, это очень радостная новость, с другой - я понимаю, что на стилистику у меня не остаётся ни времени, ни сил. Я очень долго сомневалась, но в итоге приняла решение поставить стилистику на стоп на неопределенный период ⛔️, чтобы убрать расфокус и…
❤14🥰3
Итак ♥️ Рекомендация по гардеробу – 💯 попадание! Сейчас проанализировала, как я каждый день выбираю одежду, которую ношу с удовольствием (а не которую покупаю и складываю в шкаф, тк понравилась, как сидит на мне). Это приятная к телу ткань (плохо переношу все, что хоть немного колется, в чем некомфортно садиться и вообще двигаться). Важно, чтобы одежда дышала, тк в будни из дома я выхожу рано и прихожу поздно. Толь…
❤2
Я, как стилист, очень люблю использовать этот инструмент в своей работе. Но ещё больше люблю получать подобные отзывы 🥰👇
Делитесь, кто выбрал для разных ПЭ те же образы, что и я?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Ну и наконец, Воздух, так тяготеющий к свободе передвижения и деталям (напомню описание его основных особенностей), скорее всего, выразит себя через: 🙂 свободную, подвижную, не слишком облегающую одежду, где есть пространство между телом и одеждой (оверсайз туда же) 🙂 деталировку (интересные детали на одежде, аксессуары) Таким образом, я бы посоветовала ему выбрать что-то типа такого 👇
❤1
Для чувствительной Воды (вспоминаем описание) крайне важно ощущение в одежде. Нигде ничего не жмёт, не давит, не колет (впрочем, как и у Земли) Берём на заметку: 🙂 текучую, слегка свободную, уютную одежду 🙂 мягкие, приятные наощупь, ткани (хлопок, шерсть, кашемир, трикотаж, костюмная ткань мягкая и с эластаном) 👇
🥰2
Согласно описанию для Земли на первом месте статус. Если Огни не побрезгуют и алишкой, то Земля выбирает, в первую очередь, качество: 🙂 тактильно приятные, дорогие ткани 🙂 одежда, подчеркивающая внутреннее достоинство (дорогая, статусная, брендовая) 🙂 украшения с драгоценными камнями 🙂 дорогая обувь и аксессуары Как в этих образах, к примеру 👇
Предлагаю сегодня завершить тему первоэлементов, резюмируя, какие образы помогут выразить внутреннее содержание своей обладательницы через язык одежды. Начнем с Огней 🔥 Если перечитать описание основных черт характера, то станет понятно, что для этих товарищей важно быть в центре внимания, выделяться из толпы. В этом им прекрасно помогут: 🙂 яркие цвета 🙂 необычные вещи «не как у всех», асимметричные вещи 🙂 тренды…
Сегодня разберу результаты вчерашней угадайки (хочется дать ещё немного времени желающим попрактиковаться в эрудиции 🤓). А пока я жду ваши голоса, делюсь очередным стильным (на этот раз коротеньким, но годным) лайфхаком в рубрике #стилизация 🤩 ❤️, если пользуешься советами из рубрики
❤6
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @tanya_gdemoystyle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Делитесь, кто выбрал для разных ПЭ те же образы, что и я?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 8 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Таня, где мой стиль?” (@tanya_gdemoystyle), 505 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tanya_gdemoystyle.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.