Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

TÄŊRILIG

@tanrilig

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,463subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002132105197
TypeChannel
Username@tanrilig
Created23 December 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tanrilig

Growth

1,4637 Aug 2026, 08:03 — 1,463 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 17:56 — 1,463 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 08:037 Aug 2026, 17:56
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,462–1,464 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 17:561,463no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:031,463first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 27 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

243 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11446.9%
custom 52377569243546524618535.0%
custom 52157217406714120373815.6%
👎62.47%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 243reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2026 to 25 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 12 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tanrilig. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 January 2026 to 25 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 Jun 2026, 18:45 UTC≈1,390 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

в целом весь тенгрианский движ держится на подобном молчании и попытке его прервать банально до нас в целостном виде не дошли религиозные воззрения древних тюрков и иже с ними: 1) верования народов Алтая, Саха и т.д. имеют региональные специфики вызванные временным и географ.расстоянием, влиянием буддизма, православия (вспомнить бурханизм) и до-тюркских сибирских народов 2) реконструкции мировоззрения на основе орхо

22👎2

2 Jun 2026, 16:09 UTC≈1,560 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @haqiqatdin

Ранее уже говорилось, но теперь более конкретные примеры. Монгольские ханы часто давали представителям разных религий ложную надежду на то, что они примут их веру. Например, Хулагу сообщал патриарху, что христиане посещали его деда Чингисхана и обучали его своей религии, а в частных беседах с доминиканцем Давидом из Эшби заявлял о своем желании креститься. Аналогично, он уверял армянина Вардана, что был христианином

14

16 May 2026, 10:49 UTC≈1,810 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

1) Именем могло стать любой существительное в языке (да и не только сущ. если вспомнить имена вроде Тенирберден т.е данный Небом). Названия животных и трав, светил, инструментов и качеств и тд. и тп. Причем это относится ко всем тюркам некогда (чаще как некое слово+суффикс бек/бай и т.д.) 2) Часто запрет называть ребенка именем умерших родственников (полагаю, потому что имя для трад.мировоззрения имеет симпатическую

custom 5237756924354652461136

16 May 2026, 10:49 UTC≈1,260 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Meni öz atïŋïn ata Вы возможно замечали, что во многих "анимистических" культурах (или сильнее сохранивших анимистическое прошлое) имена более разнообразны, чем в культурах условно авраамических. Например имена персонажей древнегреч.литературы или студентов индусов чаще бывают уникальными чем русские или английские имена Наблюдать это можно и у тюркоязычных народов -- достаточно сравнить имена тюрков Сибири до

custom 5237756924354652461179

9 May 2026, 09:14 UTC≈1,340 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

syppyt suruktar ⡽ kɯrakɯj saqalɯ: tɯlɯnan tɯ:nnammɯt ɔju:luk, kihi uonna ajɯlʃa sitimin tuhunan 2026 Красивая саха анимация + есть образы похожие на духов и т.д. посмотреть можно тут

22custom 523775692435465246110

11 Apr 2026, 10:20 UTC≈1,670 views18 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @darul_at_turkPhoto

🏳️ Культ мазаров в Туркестане Культ мазаров это лодин из наиболее устойчивых и характерных элементов религиозной жизни народов Центральной Азии. Поклонение сосредотачивается преимущественно на кладбищах или вокруг отдельно стоящих мазаров, гробниц и святилищ, посвящённых почитаемым «святым». Подобные объекты встречаются повсеместно: в казахских степях, горных районах Кыргызстана и Таджикистана, а также на территории

custom 523775692435465246185custom 52157217406714120375

19 Mar 2026, 13:57 UTC≈2,260 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026

О нищете неоязычества К тенгризму это точно также относится, местами совсем идентично. начало прод1 прод2 прод3 прод4 прод5 прод6 прод7 прод8 прод9 прод10 конец

24custom 52377569243546524619custom 52157217406714120374👎3

17 Feb 2026, 20:16 UTC≈1,870 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 52157217406714120374custom 52377569243546524612👎1

17 Feb 2026, 20:16 UTC≈1,720 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ulus_mediaFile

не спите, буддисты? ждете облета богини Палден Лхамо? 🐎 чтобы вы не заскучали и не уснули, мы выкатили для вас большой гайд о Белом месяце. есть пять три причины провести ночь Сагаалган/Шагаа/Цаган Сар, изучая наш гайд: 1️⃣он получился содержательным и увлекательным, вы точно не уснете заручитесь поддержкой буддийской богини 2️⃣к рассвету вы уже будете знать, как провести первый день Белого месяца 3️⃣вы готовы сог

custom 52377569243546524615custom 521572174067141203741

11 Feb 2026, 12:13 UTC≈1,850 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Siberian_rock_artPhoto

Ой да птички уточки🦆😊. Изображение этих птиц иногда встречаются среди металлических художественных изделий Саяно-Алтая. Обычно это застёжки в виде фигурок летящих уток и ременные накладки. В ряде случаев вместо утки может быть изображён гусь. Но зачем? Дело в том, что водоплавающие птицы в мифологиях многих народов Северной Евразии были не абы кем, а настоящими демиургами. Ну или помощниками демиургов. Утка может дей

custom 523775692435465246114custom 521572174067141203764

27 Jan 2026, 23:05 UTC≈1,580 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @the_eternal_stonePhoto

The Old Turkic Pantheon as Reflected in Early Inscriptions It is generally accepted that the pantheon of the Old Turks included four deities: Teŋri as the god of the heavens, Umay as the goddess of fertility, Idıq Yer-Sub as the deity of nature, and Erklig as the god of the Underworld. Teŋri on Kültegin inscription 𐱅𐰭𐰼𐰃 : 𐰖𐰺𐰞𐰴𐰑𐰸𐰃𐰤 : 𐰇𐰲𐰇𐰤 : 𐰇𐰔𐰢 : 𐰸𐰆𐱃𐰢 : 𐰉𐰺 : 𐰇𐰲𐰇𐰤 : 𐰴𐰍𐰣 : 𐰆𐰞𐰺𐱃𐰢 teŋri : yarlıqaduqın : üçin : özim : q

custom 521572174067141203715custom 52377569243546524617

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @tanrilig. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 398,919 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TÄŊRILIG” (@tanrilig), 1,463 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tanrilig.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.