Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🔹️تنیده زِ دل🔹️

@tanidezedel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

514subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001271542745
TypeChannel
Username@tanidezedel
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tanidezedel

Growth

5105145126 August 2026 — 510 subscribers6 August 2026 — 510 subscribers15 August 2026 — 514 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 509–515 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 06:06514+4
6 Aug 2026, 18:34510no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:29510first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 September 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.1%
avg views ÷ 514 subscribers
Avg views / post
124
1 post measured
Reaction rate
21.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (12 September 20246 August 2026)
Views total124
Reactions total26
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

341 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
27279.8%
👍5616.4%
👏61.76%
😢51.47%
👎20.587%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 341reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 September 2024 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 05:27 UTC124 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

هر آن کس که دارد هُش و رای و دین پس از مرگ بر من کند آفرین...

24👍2

Signed Navid.F

24 Jan 2026, 12:25 UTC639 views34 reactionsread 6 August 2026

برهنه به بستر بی‌كسی مردن تو از يادم نمی‌روی... خاموش به رساترين شيونِ آدمی تو از يادم نمی‌روی... گريبانی برای دريدنِ اين بغضِ بی‌قرار تو از يادم نمی‌روی... سفری ساده از تمام دوستت دارمِ تنهايی تو از يادم نمی‌روی... سوزن‌ريزِ بی‌امانِ باران بر پيچك و ارغوان تو از يادم نمی‌روی... تو، تو با من چه كرده‌ای كه از يادم نمی‌روی؟ سیدعلی صالحی.

33😢1

Signed Navid.F

18 Dec 2025, 21:12 UTC716 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026

«عالمی از نو بباید ساخت وز نو آدمی تنها ساختن عالمی نو کافی نیست باید آدمی نو ساخت و این چندان آسان نیست. این مهم نیازمند تربیت است... کاری که شورمندان روزگار از سهراب تا چه‌گوارا از آن غافل بودند... ...وانگهی سهراب نمی‌خواهد «نظام» را دیگرگون کند. می‌خواهد پدرش را به جای کاووس بنشاند... در نظر او پادشاهی، بی‌عیب است؛ هر عیب که هست در وجود کاووس و افراسیاب است. سلسله‌مراتب قدرت بی‌عیب است؛ آنکه بر کرسی نشسته باید جا

15👍8👏1

Signed Navid.F

29 Jun 2025, 02:34 UTC925 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026

مقدمه‌ای کوتاه به بهانۀ کارگاه آشنایی با افکار و آثار صادق هدایت: دشوار بتوان حدس زد که اگر هدایت به جای سال ۱۲۸۱، حدود چهل سال بعد، در سال ۱۳۲۰ به دنیا می‌آمد، چگونه می‌اندیشید و چه سرنوشتی داشت. قصد ندارم نقش «وضعیتِ تاریخی» را در شکل‌دادن به شخصیت و افکار و آثار هدایت، بیش از اندازه پُررنگ کنم و می‌دانم که آثار هدایت به همان اندازه که به صورتی واقع‌گرایانه بخش‌هایی از جامعه و فرهنگ ایران را نشان می‌دهند و به واقع

14👍8👏1😢1

Signed Navid.F

15 Apr 2025, 05:46 UTC≈3,550 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

«پس این پیادگان که صبورانه بر نیزه‌های چوبی خود تکیه داده‌اند آن بادپا سوارانند؟ و این خمیدگان لاغر افیونی آن عارفان پاک بلنداندیش؟» دیدار در شب، فروغ.

9👍4😢2

Signed Navid.F

20 Mar 2025, 11:03 UTC≈3,020 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

از خود بِدَرآمدم چنان‌که شکوفه از شاخِ درخت. (ابوالحسن خرقانی) سال نو مبارک.

26👍1👏1

Signed Navid.F

1 Mar 2025, 04:32 UTC≈1,510 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

سلفی گرفتن با میراث کهن (در باب دشواریِ مواجهه با میراث ادبی-معنوی گذشته) بخش سوم: نتایج مواجهۀ گزینشی و کارکردگرا گاه مواجهۀ ما با دنیای گذشته (سنّت) گویی شیوه‌ای مهندسانه دارد؛ همه‌چیز قابل‌حصول و ضروری و البته آسان به نظر می‌رسد؛ بُرش بخش‌هایی از دنیای گذشته و آوردن آن بخش‌ها به دنیای جدید و قرار دادنشان در آنجا که خلأ دارد. ما ابزار داریم، تکنولوژی داریم و چه کم داریم؟ بله «معنا». امّا جای نگرانی نیست؛ ما ملّتی

10👍5👏1

Signed Navid.F

28 Feb 2025, 21:01 UTC≈1,090 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026

سلفی گرفتن با میراث کهن (در باب دشواریِ مواجهه با میراث ادبی-معنوی گذشته) بخش دوم: مواجهۀ همدلانه و تجربۀ من در مواجهه با میراث ابوالحسن خرقانی اینک ده جلسه از نشست‌های من دربارۀ ابوالحسن خرقانی برگزار شده است. از همان آغاز این دوره، بر آن بودم که اجازه ندهم دیدگاه انتقادی من به سخنان و احوال صوفیه، مانعی در برابر نزدیک شدن به بخشهای خردگریز میراث ابوالحسن (که از قضا شامل بخش عمده‌ای از این میراث است) شود. من کوشیدم

9👍7👏1

Signed Navid.F

28 Feb 2025, 20:51 UTC914 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

سلفی گرفتن با میراث کهن (در باب دشواریِ مواجهه با میراث ادبی-معنوی گذشته) بخش نخست: ابزار و معیار مواجهۀ مؤثّر یکی از پرسش‌های بنیادینی که شاید حدود یک قرن است همچون سنگی عظیم بر سر راه تمامی اهالی فکر و فرهنگ و ادب ایران قرار گرفته و همچنان لازم است در باب خود آن پرسش و پاسخ‌های آن، گفتگو کرد، این است که «در این دنیای نو، با میراث ادبی کهن خود چه کنیم؟» این میراث را نه می‌توان نادیده گرفت و فراموش کرد و نه می‌توان

8👍4👎1👏1

Signed Navid.F

28 Jan 2025, 13:37 UTC≈1,100 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

13👍4👎1

Signed Navid.F

30 Dec 2024, 13:03 UTC≈1,080 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

هر که چشمِ دولتی بر وی فتاد جانْش در یک دم، به صد سِر، پی فتاد تا نیفتد بر تو مردی را نظر از وجود خویش کی یابی خبر؟ گر تو بنشینی به تنهایی بسی ره بنتوانی بریدن بی کسی (منطق‌الطیر چاپ شفیعی‌کدکنی، ابیات ۱۷۰۷-۱۷۰۹) به جان سپاسگزارِ لطف و عنایتِ دوست صاحب‌دل و نازنین، دکتر مهدی فیروزیان هستم.

12👍1

Signed Navid.F

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tanidezedel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,137,421 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🔹️تنیده زِ دل🔹️” (@tanidezedel), 514 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tanidezedel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.