Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 💎历史成交反馈💎

Channel

💎历史成交反馈💎

@tangbaofankui

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

401subscribers

+285 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004488585140
TypeChannel
Username@tangbaofankui
Created11 August 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded25 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tangbaofankui

Growth

116401258.525 August 2026 — 116 subscribers25 August 2026 — 116 subscribers2 September 2026 — 201 subscribers11 September 2026 — 401 subscribers25 August 202611 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net +285. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 73–444 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 02:36401+200
2 Sept 2026, 11:34201+85
25 Aug 2026, 21:05116no change
25 Aug 2026, 08:00116first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 11 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
91.6%
avg views ÷ 401 subscribers
Avg views / post
367
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.119%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 6 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026
Posts held6 (11 August 202623 August 2026)
Views total1,837
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC155 viewsread 25 August 2026
Photo

今日【成交+1】 🤝恭喜山东客户成功牵手契合伴侣,费用结清,全套服务圆满收官 感谢老板对糖宝的信任

19 Aug 2026, 01:30 UTC401 viewsread 25 August 2026
Photo

昨日【成交+1】 🤝恭喜天津客户成功牵手契合伴侣,费用结清,全套服务圆满收官 感谢老板对糖宝的信任

14 Aug 2026, 20:36 UTC463 views0 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Forwarded from @tianjinXZ_bot

【审核评语】: 【验证时间】:2026-04-29 【妹子花名】:糖宝包养 【验证留名】:8162889952 【人照评分】:9.8 【颜值评分】:9.8 【身材评分】:9.8 【服务评分】:9.5 【态度评分】:9.8 【环境评分】:9.8 【综合评分】:9.75 【过程描述】:和客服联系完,选好妹妹,确定好时间地点见面,人照提前有验证视频,都是一致,客服妹妹态度好,会帮你推荐,也不会不耐烦,妹妹资料也比较真实,很推荐 【是否推荐】:推荐 天津意风街提醒您:萝卜白菜,各有所爱,他人评价,仅供参考

14 Aug 2026, 20:36 UTC438 viewsread 25 August 2026
Forwarded from @tianjinXZ_bot

【审核评语】: 【验证时间】:2026-04-07 【妹子花名】:糖宝包养 【验证留名】: 【人照评分】:9 【颜值评分】:9 【身材评分】:9 【服务评分】:9 【态度评分】:10 【环境评分】:10 【综合评分】:9.33 【过程描述】:伴游其实很靠谱,而且售后非常到位,客服不厌其烦,有的妹妹不行,售后给联系退,特别负责,其实你算笔账,绝对划算,而且其中很多妹妹都没有风尘气,也有骚的,多种多样,而且伴游,加中介费真的一点不算贵,性价比不比纯卖的差。聪明的自己算算,雷我替你们淌过了,这个客服绝对靠谱,介绍到位,资料库齐全,售后有保障,但是大家一定按照人家客服说的做,我自作主张,被妹妹小忽悠了,客服售后也很到位,换了一个非常不错。包养又不违法,安全自由,妹妹可盐可甜,可纯可骚,非常好,适合有点精神追求有点小钱和品味的你,祝各位在此选到小情人 【是否推荐】:是 天津意风街提醒您:萝卜白菜,各有所爱,他人评价,仅供参考

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @tangbaofankui. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“💎历史成交反馈💎” (@tangbaofankui), 401 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tangbaofankui.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.