Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Каморка енота

@tanekochi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

657subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001958201527
TypeChannel
Username@tanekochi
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tanekochi

Growth

6578 Aug 2026, 06:46 — 657 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 17:36 — 657 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 06:468 Aug 2026, 17:36
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 656–658 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 17:36657no change
8 Aug 2026, 06:46657first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 17 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
87.1%
avg views ÷ 657 subscribers
Avg views / post
572
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
21.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held18 (17 May 202629 July 2026)
Views total2,288
Reactions total496
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 20s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,062 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 544935807885406258263830.9%
custom 545169621180536515852025.2%
custom 524922938759266406442920.8%
custom 52467107071011440161477.13%
custom 52493348934642915861396.74%
custom 53301712846911057461205.82%
custom 5237987534033673923673.25%
custom 524683156318588533720.097%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,062reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
32
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 18 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
20
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tanekochi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 May 2026 to 29 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 12:09 UTC345 views133 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

У меня был выбор: их свиданка или депрешен #Кунизай #скетч #арт

custom 544935807885406258271custom 524922938759266406433custom 545169621180536515821custom 52379875340336739233custom 52467107071011440163custom 52468315631858853372

23 Jul 2026, 11:37 UTC692 views163 reactions20 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

У нас реакции пропали, давайте вернём boost, пока Дост Дазу не съел (в коммах бонус) #Арт #Достозай

custom 524922938759266406488custom 544935807885406258233custom 545169621180536515828custom 52467107071011440167custom 53301712846911057464custom 52493348934642915863

18 Jul 2026, 10:11 UTC555 views87 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Люблю его под это песню #Дазай #эдит

custom 544935807885406258249custom 524922938759266406419custom 545169621180536515819

17 Jul 2026, 11:07 UTC696 views113 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Куникиде не пояснили подробности тренда #Кунизай #арт

custom 545169621180536515868custom 524922938759266406421custom 524933489346429158613custom 54493580788540625826custom 52379875340336739235

7 Jul 2026, 12:42 UTC≈1,100 views158 reactions6 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤩 #арт #Достозай

custom 533017128469110574697custom 544935807885406258229custom 545169621180536515820custom 52492293875926640647custom 52493348934642915865

2 Jul 2026, 18:16 UTC809 views96 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Извините😭 #чёто_пиздит #Кунизай

custom 545169621180536515865custom 544935807885406258218custom 52467107071011440168custom 52379875340336739234custom 52493348934642915861

2 Jul 2026, 12:56 UTC902 views131 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Образ выбирался рандомно и не мной, ну крч, держите, что получилось🦐 #арт #Дазай

custom 544935807885406258275custom 545169621180536515827custom 524922938759266406421custom 52467107071011440165custom 52493348934642915862custom 52379875340336739231

29 Jun 2026, 11:25 UTC946 views141 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🌸 #арт #Кунизай

custom 545169621180536515877custom 524922938759266406429custom 523798753403367392322custom 52493348934642915867custom 54493580788540625825custom 52467107071011440161

28 Jun 2026, 10:27 UTC792 views80 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

#эдит #Достозай 🎀 "𝙊𝙝 𝙢𝙮, 𝙟𝙪𝙨𝙩 𝙡𝙤𝙤𝙠 𝙖𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙤𝙨𝙚 𝙚𝙮𝙚𝙨" о боже, ты только взгляни в эти глаза "𝙋𝙧𝙚𝙩𝙩𝙮 𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙚 𝙖 𝙜𝙞𝙧𝙡, 𝙤𝙝 𝙗𝙤𝙮" красив как девушка, о мальчик "𝙏𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙗𝙤𝙮 𝙞𝙨 𝙨𝙤 𝙣𝙞𝙘𝙚" этот парень так хорош "𝙉𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙨𝙚𝙚𝙣 𝙖 𝙗𝙤𝙮 𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙚 𝙝𝙞𝙢" никогда не встречал такого парня, как он "𝙎𝙤 𝙘𝙪𝙩𝙚 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙥𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙚" такого милого и любезного "𝘽𝙚𝙩𝙩𝙚𝙧 𝙠𝙚𝙚𝙥 𝙝𝙞𝙢 𝙝𝙪𝙢𝙗𝙡𝙚" лучше держать его покорным "𝘾𝙪𝙯 𝙝𝙚 𝙢𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩 𝙬𝙖𝙣𝙣𝙖 𝙡𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙣 𝙩𝙤 𝙗𝙞𝙩𝙚" вдруг он захочет на

custom 524933489346429158649custom 533017128469110574615custom 54516962118053651589custom 52492293875926640644custom 52467107071011440163

25 Jun 2026, 09:38 UTC948 views147 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤗 #Кунизай #арт

custom 544935807885406258284custom 523798753403367392332custom 524671070710114401623custom 54516962118053651585custom 52492293875926640642custom 52493348934642915861

20 Jun 2026, 16:17 UTC≈1,320 views123 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Под конец 5 сезона Гакуэн, может быть, и сойдутся #Достозай #Гакуэн #комикс #арт

custom 524922938759266406469custom 544935807885406258228custom 524933489346429158620custom 53301712846911057464custom 52467107071011440161custom 54516962118053651581

18 Jun 2026, 21:00 UTC791 views134 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

19.06 С днём рождения, Дазай Осаму #арт #Дазай

custom 544935807885406258286custom 545169621180536515824custom 524933489346429158617custom 52467107071011440165custom 52492293875926640642

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @tanekochi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 762,886 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Каморка енота” (@tanekochi), 657 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tanekochi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.